SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of cultural intelligence levels of Selçuk University Erasmus students who have been abroad

Havva DEMIREL
Hayri DEMIR
Pages
56–59
Publication Date
2016-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, there are significant differences across genders in all dimensions; the number of foreign languages they can speak has effects on the meta-cognition and cognition dimensions; while there aren’t any significant differences in terms of educational status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Erasmus exchange program, which started in 1987 in Europe and in which Turkey started participating in 2004, aims at increasing the quality of higher education in Europe and the mobility among teaching staff.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data of the study were collected from 122 students, who have been abroad as Erasmus students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, there are significant differences across genders in all dimensions; the number of foreign languages they can speak has effects on the meta-cognition and cognition dimensions; while there aren’t any significant differences in terms of educational status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Erasmus exchange program · cultural intelligence

Abstract

Erasmus exchange program, which started in 1987 in Europe and in which Turkey started participating in 2004, aims at increasing the quality of higher education in Europe and the mobility among teaching staff. The purpose of the present study is defining the levels of adapting cultural differences in foreign countries and establishing effective communication of Selcuk University students, who have been abroad through Erasmus Program. Data of the study were collected from 122 students, who have been abroad as Erasmus students. For data collection, Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), which was adapted to Turkish by Ilhan & Cetin in 2014 and has dimensions, such as cognition, meta-cognition, motivation and behaviour, was employed. According to the findings, there are significant differences across genders in all dimensions; the number of foreign languages they can speak has effects on the meta-cognition and cognition dimensions; while there aren’t any significant differences in terms of educational status.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIREL, H., DEMIR, H. (2016). Investigation of cultural intelligence levels of Selçuk University Erasmus students who have been abroad. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 56–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/205691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ang S, Van Dyne, L Yee, NK Koh C. The Measurement of Cultural Intelligence. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans: 2004.
  2. Ang S, Van Dyne L, Koh C. Personality correlates of the four factor model of cultural intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 2006; 31(1): 100-123.
  3. Ang S, Van Dyne L. Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications, Armonk, N.Y, ME, Sharpe, 2008: 122-124.
  4. Ang S, LV Dyne, JS Tan. Cultural Intelligence, The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence, (Ed: R.J. Sternberg, S. B. Kaufman), Cambridge University Press, NewYork, 2011: 583-584.
  5. Berry JW, Ward C. Commentary on redefining interactions across cultures and organization. Group and Organization Management, 2006; 31 (1): 64-77.
  6. Carlson JS, Burn B, Useem J, Yachimowicz D. Study Abroad: The experience of American Undergraduates. Westport, CT: Greenwood Pres, 2010: 44-45.
  7. Demir A, Demir S. Erasmus programının kültürlerarası diyalog ve etkileşim açısından değerlendirilmesi (Öğretmen adaylarıyla nitel bir çalışma). Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2009; 2(9): 95-105.
  8. Earley PC, Ang S. Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2003: 66-69.
  9. Ersoy A, Günel E. Erasmus aracılığıyla kültürlerarası deneyim. Öğretmen adaylarının bireysel ve mesleki gelişimleri. Eurasian Journal of Educational Researches, 2011; 42 (1): 26-29. Gençer G. Avrupa Birliği Eğitim ve Gençlik Programları; Erasmus Programı ve Türkiye Yüksek Öğretiminde Programın Uygulanması.Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 2009. Hyde JS. Sex and congion: gender and cognitive functions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2016; 38 (53): 11-18.
  10. İlhan M, Çetin B. Kültürel zekâ ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2014; 29 (2): 94-114.
  11. Ng Y, Earley C. Culture intelligence: old constructs new frontiers. Group and Organization Management. 2006; 31 (1): 4-5.
  12. Ng KY, Van Dyne L, Ang S. From experience to experiential learning: Cultural intelligence as a learning capability for global leader development. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2009; 8(4): 511–526. Spradley JP. Participant Observations. New York, 1980: 56-59.
  13. Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL. Cultural intelligence and successful intelligence. Group and Organization Management, 2006; 31 (1): 27-39.
  14. Thomas D, Inkson K. Cultural Intelligence: People