SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Upper Extremities of Children Who Playing and Not Playing Basketball

Orhan Ahmet ŞENER
Şerife ALPA
Pages
155–161
Publication Date
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Playing basketball increases the arm circumference and forearm circumference in children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to compare the upper extremities of children who play and do not play basketball.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, measurements were taken in the upper extremities of a total of 200 secondary school students playing basketball and non-playing, with a mean age range of 11 ± 1.08 (did play sports) - 11 ± 0.8 (did not play sports).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Playing basketball increases the arm circumference and forearm circumference in children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anthropometry · Basketball · Upper Extremity

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to compare the upper extremities of children who play and do not play basketball. In this study, measurements were taken in the upper extremities of a total of 200 secondary school students playing basketball and non-playing, with a mean age range of 11 ± 1.08 (did play sports) - 11 ± 0.8 (did not play sports). The average height and weight ratio of the students who did and did not play sports were 153.5 ± 12.9 - 149.2 ± 8.1 cm and 46.7 ± 12.04 - 43.08 ± 12.9 kg respectively. In the right and left upper extremities of the students who play sports, arm length was 28.4 ± 3.1 - 28.4 ± 3.01, the forearm length was 24.1 ± 2.4 - 24.1 ± 2.4, hand length was 15.9 ± 1.8 to 15.9 ± 1.6, arm circumference was 23.2 ± 3.9 - 23.0 ± 3.8, the circumference of forearm was 20.8 ± 2.5 - 20.6 ± 2.5, hand width was 7.8 ± 0.8 to 7.9 ± 0.8. The results of the biacromial width and bideltoid width measurements were 25.5 ± 3.13 and 39.2 ± 4.7, respectively. In the right and left upper extremities of students who did not do sports, arm length was 26.8 ± 2.5 - 26.6 ± 2.4, forearm length was 23.3 ± 2.1 - 23.3 ± 2.0, hand length was 16.0 ± 1.5 - 16.2 ± 1.5, arm circumference was 22.4 ± 3.5 to 22.4 ± 3.5, circumference of forearm was19.4 ± 2.5 - 19.4 ± 2.5, hand width was 7.6 ± 0.9 - 7.7 ± 0.9. The results of the biacromial and bideltoid width measurements were 28.8 ± 3.8 and 37.6 ± 4.4, respectively. As a result of the evaluation made, there was a difference between arm circumference measurements (p = 0.02) when the measurements taken from the right and left extremities of the students who did sports and did not do sports were compared. It was observed that the difference between right - left arm length (p = 0.001) and right - left hand length (p = 0.02) was significant in the students who did not do sports. Playing basketball increases the arm circumference and forearm circumference in children.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, O. A., ALPA, Ş. (2019). Comparison of Upper Extremities of Children Who Playing and Not Playing Basketball. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 155–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/205657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akdoğan I., Özdemir B., Hasusta A. et al. (2005). Denizli merkez ilköğretim 1.sınıf (7 yaş) öğrencilerinde antropometrik vücut çevre ve üst ekstremite uzunluk ölçümleri. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak. Derg. 12(4):14-18
  2. Bektaş Y., Koca ÖB., Gültekin T., Sağır M., Akın G., (2007). Bayan basketbolcuların antropometrik özellikleri: somatotip ve vücut bileşimi değerleri. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi;2(1): 52-62.
  3. Çetinkaya G., İmamoğlu G. (2018). Research on Leadership Tendency of Students Taking Sports Education According Difference Variations, The Journal of International Social Research, Volume: 11 Issue: 59: 719-725
  4. Çıkmaz S., Taşkınalp O., Uluçam E et al., (2005). Anthropometric measurements and proportions of body constitution in football players. Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 22(1):32-36
  5. Çimen O., Cıcıoğlu İ., Günay M. (1997)Erkek ve bayan türk genç milli masa tenisçilerinin fiziksel ve fizyolojik profilleri. Bed. Eğt. Spor Bil Der. (II):4; 7-12
  6. Hamamioğlu Ö., Kaya Y., (2008).Basketbol sporunun 7-12 yaşlarındaki erkek çocuklarındaki boy-kilo ve vücut yağ oranına etkisi. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2(3); 182-192.
  7. Ermiş E., Ermiş A., İmamaoğlu O. (2018). Erişkinlik Aşamasında Öğrencilerde Spor ve Çoklu Zeka İlişkisi, Turkish Studies Social Sciences, Volume 13/18, p. 589-598, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14093
  8. Erol AE., Ayan V., Mülazımoğlu O., Koçak M., (2008). Basketbol yıldız milli takım (16 yaş) oyuncularının vücut yağ örüntüsü ve somatotip değerlerinin tespiti. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy:3(2); 108-115. Hoare DG.(200) Predicting Success in Junior Elite Basketball Players the Contribution of Anthropometic and Physiological Attributes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 3(4): 391-405.
  9. İmamoğlu O., Yamak B., Çebi M., İslamoğu İ.(2018). Antropometric and Motoric Characteristics of Certain Selected Primary School Student Wrestlers, The Journal of International Social Research,Volume: 11 Issue: 59: 1463-1468
  10. İmamoğlu, O., & Çoknaz, H. (2002). İlköğretim programlarında yer alan beden eğitimi dersleri ile öğrencilerin fiziksel gelişimlerinin araştırılması. Atatürk Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5-11. Kılınç F., (2008). Çocuklarda ekstiremite uzunluk ve çevre ölçümlerinin kürek çekme performansý üzerine etkileri. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak. Derg. 15(3); 30-33.
  11. Koca F., İmamoğlu G., İmamoğlu O., (2018). Sports Status of High School Students and Investigation of Per