SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes: Translation, Validity and Reliability Study

Ender ŞENEL
Mevlüt YILDIZ
Nazmi BAYKÖSE
Pages
360–365
Publication Date
2019-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it can be said that The Turkish form of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes is valid and reliable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes. 220 athletes including 111 females and 109 males from seventeen different sports branches participated in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The age mean of the participants was found to be 19.76±1.05.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it can be said that The Turkish form of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes is valid and reliable.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adolescent athletes · stress reactivity · scale adaptation

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes. 220 athletes including 111 females and 109 males from seventeen different sports branches participated in the study. The age mean of the participants was found to be 19.76±1.05. The sporting age mean was found to be 7.11±2.96. Data was collected by using The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes (8), Perceived Stress Scale (9, 11). The factor structure was analyzed by using Confirmatory Factor Analysis in AMOS. Pearson Correlation test was used to analyze factor-factor relationship and criterion-related validity. The method of translation-back translation was used for the translation of the scale into Turkish. The results of the factor analysis displayed that 5-factor model had acceptable fit indices (CFI=.83, SRMR=.07, RMSEA=.07). The 5-factor scale including the subscales of prolonged reactivity, reactivity to work overload, reactivity to social conflict, reactivity to social evaluation, and reactivity to failure had the same factor structure in Turkish athletes. Consequently, it can be said that The Turkish form of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes is valid and reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENEL, E., YILDIZ, M., BAYKÖSE, N. (2019). The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for Adolescent Athletes: Translation, Validity and Reliability Study. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 360–365. https://ajindex.com/articles/205645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anshel M. Coping styles among adolescent competitive athletes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1996; 136(3): 311-323.
  2. Anshel MH, Kaissidis AN. Coping style and situational appraisals as predictors of coping strategies following stressful events in sport as a function of gender and skill level. British Journal of Psychology, 1997; 88(2): 263-276.
  3. Anshel MH, Wells B. Sources of acute stress and coping styles in competitive sport. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 2000; 13(1): 1-26.
  4. Anshel MH, Brown JM, Brown DF. Effectiveness of program for coping with acute stress on motor performance, affect, and muscular tension. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 1993; 25: 7–16. Barnett LA. Flying high or crashing down: Girls' accounts of trying out for cheerleading and dance. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2006; 21: 514-541.
  5. Barnett LA. “Winners” and “losers”: The effects of being allowed or denied entry into competitive extracurricular activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 2007; 39(2): 316-344.
  6. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
  7. Britton D, Kavanagh E, Polman R. The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale for adolescent athletes. Personality and Individual Differences, 2017; 116: 301-308.
  8. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983; 24(4): 385-396. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 1992; 5(4): 194–197.
  9. Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkıran F, Dereboy Ç. Algılanan stres ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. New Symposium Journal, 2013; 51(3): 132-140.
  10. Fabrigar L.R, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods, 1999; 4(3): 272-299
  11. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middleaged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1980; 21(3): 219-239.
  12. Goyen MJ, Anshel MH. Sources of acute competitive stress and use of coping strategies as a function of age and gender. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1998; 19(3): 469-486.
  13. Hardy L, Jones G, Gould D. Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996.
  14. Hurley AE, Scandura TA, Schriesheim CA, Brannick MT, Seers A, Vandenberg R