Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

The Investigation Of Elit Table Tennis Sportsmen In Terms Of Their Risk Evaluations

Pages
255–264
Publication Date
2020-09-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study results show that, points of participators, which are obtained from Risk Assessment Scale and its’ sub-factors, demonstrates meaningful distinction according to gender, education level, duration of training and taking part in national team while it does not show meaningful distinction according to age, marital status and perceived income level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study is analyzing risk assessment of elite table tennis players.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In parallel with this aim, risk assessment level of elite table tennis players is compared in respect to gender, age, education level, marital status, perceived level of income, duration of training and taking part in national team. 186 sportsmen, who play actively table tennis at elite level in different sports club, participated to study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study results show that, points of participators, which are obtained from Risk Assessment Scale and its’ sub-factors, demonstrates meaningful distinction according to gender, education level, duration of training and taking part in national team while it does not show meaningful distinction according to age, marital status and perceived income level.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Risk Assessment · Sport · Table Tennis

Abstract

Aim of this study is analyzing risk assessment of elite table tennis players. In parallel with this aim, risk assessment level of elite table tennis players is compared in respect to gender, age, education level, marital status, perceived level of income, duration of training and taking part in national team. 186 sportsmen, who play actively table tennis at elite level in different sports club, participated to study. Criterion sampling, which is one of the purposeful sampling method, is used to define participators. Study is supported by descriptive survey model. Research data is gained through Personal Information Forms and Risk Assessment Scale (29). Mann Whitney-U test and Kruskall Wallis-H test, which are non-parametric tests, are used to determine whether there is a statistically significant relationship between independent variables (gender, age, education level, marital status, perceived level of income, duration of training and taking part in national team) and points which are gained through Risk Assessment Scale at analyzing gained data. p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study results show that, points of participators, which are obtained from Risk Assessment Scale and its’ sub-factors, demonstrates meaningful distinction according to gender, education level, duration of training and taking part in national team while it does not show meaningful distinction according to age, marital status and perceived income level. As a conclusion, variables such as gender, education level, duration of training and taking part in national team are effective on risk assessment level at the study which is conducted in order to investigate risk assessment conditions of elite table tennis sportsmen.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, M. E., AKANDERE, M., TÜKEL, Y. (2020). The Investigation Of Elit Table Tennis Sportsmen In Terms Of Their Risk Evaluations. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 255–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/205642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Anderson P, Baumberg B. Avrupa’da alkol kullanımı halk sağlığı bakış açısıyla, avrupa komisyonu için rapor. İngiltere: Alkol Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, 2006.2. Arslan C, Yenel F, Başaran Z, Işık E. Bir takımın taraftarı olmaya iten motivasyonel ve psikolojik etkenler üzerine bir araştırma. Türkiye Amatör Spor, 1992; 49: 24–26. 3. Bajtelsmith VL. Evidence of risk aversion in the health and retirement study. March, 1999; 1, 1-18. 4. Bolak M. Risk ve yönetimi. İstanbul: Birsen Yayınevi, 2004.5. Bompa T. Periodization traning for sports. Champaing, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.6. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (Genişletilmiş 20. baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014.7. Can S. Çeşitli spor branşlarında sakatlık oluşumuna; boy, kilo, vücut kütle indeksi, cinsiyet ve el tercihi gibi faktörlerin etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fizyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, 1997.8. Çobanoğlu HO, Sevil G. Sporda risk yönetimi. Üst Düzey Futbolcuların Risk Değerlendirmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2013; 8(2), s. 1-15.9. Çobanoğlu HO. Sporda risk yönetimi. Turkcell Süper Ligindeki Sporcuların Risk Değerlendirmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Anabilim Dalı, Eskişehir, 2008.10. Daruvala D. Gender, risk and stereotypes. Working Papers in Economics, Göteborg University, Sweden, 2006.11. Demirhan G. Doğa sporlarına ilişkin risklerin algılanması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. Hacettepe, 2003; 14 (1), s. 1-1312.
  2. Demirhan G, Güven B, Açıkada A. Spor dallarına ilişkin riskin algılanması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. Hacettepe 1. Of Spor I Scieııces, 2004; 15 (2), s. 65-75.13. Deutz RC, Benardot D, Martın DE, Cody MM. Relationship between energy deficits and body composition in elite female gymnasts and runners, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc, 2000; 32 (3), s. 659–668.14. Dorfman MS. Introduction to risk management and ınsurance. N.J.:Prentice Hall, 1998.15. Dupuis JM, Tabib A, Reix P, Dupuis L, Daudet G, Jocteur-Monrozier D, Malicie D, Bellon G. Sudden unexpected death of cardiac origin in the 6 to 18 years population.pathological data. Role of the sport? How can we prevent It?”. Archives de Pédiatrie, 2005; 12: 1204–1208. 127.16. Ekstrand J, Karlsson J, Hodson A. Football medicine. Taylor and Francis group, 2003; 39-121.17. Fıkırkoca M. Bütünsel risk yönetimi, Pozitif Matbaacılık, Ankara, 2003.18. Fişek K. Devlet