Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Lasers for Removing Obturation Materials and Medicaments from the Root Canal: A Review

Pages
254–259
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of different laser devices in removing obturation materials and medicaments from the root canal system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The complete removal of obturation materials from root canals is an important factor for successful endodontic retreatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many devices and techniques have been introduced for improving the removal of root fillings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of different laser devices in removing obturation materials and medicaments from the root canal system.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The complete removal of obturation materials from root canals is an important factor for successful endodontic retreatment. Many devices and techniques have been introduced for improving the removal of root fillings. A laser is one of the most effective devices. The application of different types of laser devices such as erbium: yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG), erbium chromium: yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG), neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG), and neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum perovskite (Nd:YAP) can effectively remove obturation materials and canal medicaments from the root canal system. However, regardless of the type of laser, these devices have some disadvantages when using them in the root canals. Thermal effects such as carbonization areas and partial dissolution in the gutta-percha and dentine have been observed after laser applications. Unfortunately, none of the retreatment protocols or laser types was able to remove the remnants of filling materials completely from the root canal system. This review was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of different laser devices in removing obturation materials and medicaments from the root canal system.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARASEL, S., ÖNCEL, S. (2020). Lasers for Removing Obturation Materials and Medicaments from the Root Canal: A Review. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 254–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/204792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Marques da Silva B, Baratto-Filho F, Leonardi DP, Henrique Borges A, Volpato L, Branco Barletta F. Effectiveness of ProTaper, D-RaCe, and Mtwo retreatment files with and without supplementary instruments in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2012
  2. 45(10): 927-32. [Crossref] 2. Rödig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hulsmann M. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals-a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012
  3. 45(6): 580-9. [Crossref] 3. Rödig T, Kupis J, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Drebenstedt S, Hulsmann M. Comparison of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing gutta-percha from previously treated curved root canals: a microcomputed tomography study. Int Endod J 2014
  4. 47(2): 173-82. [Crossref] 4. Martinho FC, Freitas LF, Nascimento GG, Fernandes AM, Leite FR, Gomes AP, et al. Endodontic retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals. Clin Oral Investig 2015
  5. 19(6): 1411-7. [Crossref] 5. Weichman JA, Johnson FM. Laser use in endodontics. A preliminary investigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971
  6. 31(3): 416-20. [Crossref] 6. Christo JE, Zilm PS, Sullivan T, Cathro PR. Efficacy of low concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and low-powered Er,Cr:YSGG laser activated irrigation against an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Int Endod J 2016
  7. 49(3): 279-86. [Crossref] 7. Shahriari S, Kasraei S, Roshanaei G, Karkeabadi H, Davanloo H. Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite Activated with Laser in Intracanal Smear Layer Removal: An SEM Study. J Lasers Med Sci 2017
  8. 8(1): 36-41. [Crossref] 8. Keleş A, Arslan H, Kamalak A, Akcay M, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA. Removal of filling materials from oval-shaped canals using laser irradiation: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2015
  9. 41(2): 219-24. [Crossref] 9. Kamalak A, Uzun I, Arslan H, Keleş A, Doğanay E, Keskin C, et al. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Retreated Roots After Retreatment Using Self-Adjusting File, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, or Laser. Photomed Laser Surg 2016
  10. 34(10): 467-72. [Crossref] 10. Bader C, Krejci I. Indications and limitations of Er:YAG laser applications in dentistry. Am J Dent 2006
  11. 19(3): 178-86. 11. Olivi G, DiVito EE. Advanced Laser-Activated Irrigation: PIPSTM Technique and Clinical Protocols. In: Olivi G, De Moor R, DiVito E, eds. La