Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Computational and biological studies of novel thiazolyl coumarin derivatives synthesized through Suzuki coupling

Pages
1610–1622
Publication Date
2020-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A good correlation was observed between computational and in vitro studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current investigation presents the synthesis, computational molecular-docking and biological activity studies of arylated thiazole coumarins.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A detailed reaction condition optimization revealed that the Pd-PEPPSI-IPent precatalyst in only 2 mol% loading resulted in the desired product with high yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A good correlation was observed between computational and in vitro studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coumarin thiazole · Suzuki cross-coupling · molecular dynamics simulation

Abstract

The current investigation presents the synthesis, computational molecular-docking and biological activity studies of arylated thiazole coumarins. Aryl substituted thiazolyl coumarin derivatives were synthesized via Suzuki cross-coupling reaction. A detailed reaction condition optimization revealed that the Pd-PEPPSI-IPent precatalyst in only 2 mol% loading resulted in the desired product with high yield. The aim of this study was to examine the antbnicrobial behavior of thiazole coumarin derivatives through in vitro and in silico studies. All the compounds showed activity against both antibacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, except 5d. Similarly, the compounds 5a, 5b, and 5d were found to be active against Trichoderma harzianum. The compound 5d of this series was found to have a higher activity with MIC 125 mg/ml against Trichoderma harzianum. Molecular studies showed the high activities of these compounds are due to the presence of strong 11-bonding and R-11 interaction with their respective targets. A good correlation was observed between computational and in vitro studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARVEEN, S., KALSOOM, S., BİBİ, R., ASGHAR, A., HAMEED, A., AHMED, W., HASSAN, A. (2020). Computational and biological studies of novel thiazolyl coumarin derivatives synthesized through Suzuki coupling. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 1610–1622. https://ajindex.com/articles/204675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Ahmad H, 2020, EUR J MED CHEM, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112759 Atwater B, 2016, CHEM-EUR J, V22, P14531, DOI 10.1002/chem.201603603 Ayati A, 2015, EUR J MED CHEM, V97, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.015 Borges F, 2005, CURR MED CHEM, V12, P887, DOI 10.2174/0929867053507315 Boyanova L, 2005, J MED MICROBIOL, V54, P481, DOI 10.1099/jmm.0.45880-0 Brockhurst MA, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P515, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0854-x Cattoir V, 2019, J INFECT DIS, V220, P350, DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiz134 Chhabria MT, 2016, CURR TOP MED CHEM, V16, P2841, DOI 10.2174/1568026616666160506130731 Dinparast L, 2019,
  2. CHEMISTRYSELECT, V4, P9211, DOI 10.1002/slct.201901921 Fair RJ, 2014, PERSPECT MED CHEM, V6, P25, DOI 10.4137/PMC.S14459 Fotopoulos I, 2020, MED CHEM, V16, P272, DOI 10.2174/1573406415666190416121448 Grover J, 2015, RSC ADV, V5, P38892, DOI 10.1039/c5ra05643h Hayat K, 2019, BIOORG CHEM, V87, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.03.019 Hooshmand SE, 2019, GREEN CHEM, V21, P381, DOI 10.1039/c8gc02860e Ibrar A, 2016, BIOORG CHEM, V68, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.bioorg.2016.08.005 Kumar S, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0196016 Leelananda SP, 2016, BEILSTEIN J ORG CHEM, V12, P2694, DOI 10.3762/bjoc.12.267 Mohareb RM, 2007, PHOSPHORUS SULFUR, V182, P1661, DOI 10.1080/10426500701289914 Okeke MI, 2001, J ETHNOPHARMACOL, V78, P119, DOI 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00307-5 Parveen S, 2018, BIOORG CHEM, V76, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.11.003 Pinzi L, 2019, INT J MOL SCI, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijms20184331 Prashanth T, 2019, BIOMED PHARMACOTHER, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108707 Price GA, 2017, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V56, P13347, DOI 10.1002/anie.201708598 Prieto-Martinez F.D., 2019, SILICO DRUG DESIGN, P19, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816125-8.00002-X RAO VR, 1986, INDIAN J CHEM B, V25, P413 Sugino T, 2001, CHEM LETT, P110, DOI 10.1246/cl.2001.110 Surry DS, 2011, CHEM SCI, V2, P27, DOI 10.1039/c0sc00331j Tang H, 2010, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V20, P979, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.12.050 Valente C, 2012, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V51, P3314, DOI 10.1002/anie.201106131 Wang WY, 2009, ARCH PHARM, V342, P732, DOI 10.1002/ardp.200900103 Wang Z., 2010,
  3. COMPREHENSIVE ORGANI, DOI [10.1002/9780470638859.conrr296., DOI 10.1002/9780470638859.CONRR296]