SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Synthesis and characterization of hexagonal boron nitride used for comparison of removal of anionic and cationic hazardous azo-dye: kinetics and equilibrium studies

Tuba TARHAN
Pages
1471–1482
Publication Date
2020-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, according to the results obtained from the kinetic studies, while the first-order kinetic model was suited for the adsorption of the MY, the second-order kinetic model was found to well fit for the adsorption of VBB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to compare the adsorption behavior of cationic and anionic dyes onto a hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) nanostructure that was rich in a negative charge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Under optimal conditions, the removal of 42.6% Metanil yellow (MY) and 90% Victoria blue B (VBB) from aqueous solution was performed using a 10-mg hBN nanostructure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, according to the results obtained from the kinetic studies, while the first-order kinetic model was suited for the adsorption of the MY, the second-order kinetic model was found to well fit for the adsorption of VBB.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hexagonal boron nitride · nanostructure · Victoria blue B

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the adsorption behavior of cationic and anionic dyes onto a hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) nanostructure that was rich in a negative charge. Herein, the hBN nanostructure was synthesized using boric acid as a precursor material. The characteristic peaks of the hBN nanostructure were performed using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopies. The morphology and the particle size of hBN nanostructure were determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). During the studies, various essential adsorption parameters were investigated, such as the initial dye concentration, pH of the dye solution, adsorbent dose, and contact time. Under optimal conditions, the removal of 42.6% Metanil yellow (MY) and 90% Victoria blue B (VBB) from aqueous solution was performed using a 10-mg hBN nanostructure. Furthermore, the equilibrium studies showed that the Freundlich isotherm model fitted well for the removal of MY. However, the Langmuir isotherm model fitted well for the removal of VBB. Moreover, according to the results obtained from the kinetic studies, while the first-order kinetic model was suited for the adsorption of the MY, the second-order kinetic model was found to well fit for the adsorption of VBB.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARHAN, T. (2020). Synthesis and characterization of hexagonal boron nitride used for comparison of removal of anionic and cationic hazardous azo-dye: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 1471–1482. https://ajindex.com/articles/204662

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Alkan M, 2008, CHEM ENG J, V139, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.080 Anjaneya O, 2011, J HAZARD MATER, V190, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.044 Arun Kant, 2014, European Chemical Bulletin, V3, P752 Cazetta AL, 2011, CHEM ENG J, V174, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.058 Chang CW, 2006,
  2. SCIENCE, V314, P1121, DOI 10.1126/science.1132898 Chen SH, 2010,
  3. DESALINATION, V252, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.010 Chen Y, 2004, APPL PHYS LETT, V84, P2430, DOI 10.1063/1.1667278 Chiou MS, 2006,
  4. CHEMOSPHERE, V62, P731, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.068 Crimp MJ, 1999, J MATER SCI, V34, P2621, DOI 10.1023/A:1004656817379 Demirbas O, 2002,
  5. ADSORPTION, V8, P341, DOI 10.1023/A:1021589514766 Farhadi S, 2019, MONATSH CHEM, V150, P193, DOI 10.1007/s00706-018-2329-1 GILES CH, 1965, J BACTERIOL, V89, P390, DOI 10.1128/JB.89.2.390-397.1965 Golberg D, 2007, NANO LETT, V7, P2146, DOI 10.1021/nl070863r Goldberg S., 2005, SOIL SCI SOC AM BOOK, P489 Gomaa OM, 2008, WORLD J MICROB BIOT, V24, P2349, DOI 10.1007/s11274-008-9750-2 Guo XY, 2013, APPL SURF SCI, V284, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.023 Ho YS, 1999, PROCESS BIOCHEM, V34, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 Joni IM, 2011, COLLOID SURFACE A, V388, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.08.007 Kannan C, 2013, J HAZARD MATER, V244, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.016 Koli PB, 2019, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103373 Koli PB, 2019, J NANOSTRUCTURE CHEM, V9, P95, DOI 10.1007/s40097-019-0300-2 Kumar M., 2014, J MAT ENV SCI, V5, P510. Lagergren S., 1898, K SVEN VETENSK HANDL, V24, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01501332 Lei WW, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms9849 Lei WW, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2818 Lelifajri, 2018, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V25, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.08.012 Li J, 2018, RSC ADV, V8, P32886, DOI 10.1039/c8ra06445h Li J, 2014, MATER RES EXPRESS, V1, DOI 10.1088/2053-1591/1/3/035035 Li J, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, DOI 10.1038/srep03208 Liang HW, 2011, ADV FUNCT MATER, V21, P3851, DOI 10.1002/adfm.201100983 Liu XT, 2013, J ENVIRON SCI, V25, P1263, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60161-2 Liu ZY, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-19541-5 Mahdizadeh A, 2017, RSC ADV, V7, P53984, DOI 10.1039/c7ra11248c Mittal A, 2008, J HAZARD MATER, V151, P821, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.059 Mohan SV, 1997, ENVIRON POLLUT, V97, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00025-0 Permentier K, 2017, INT J EMERG MED, V10, DOI 10.1186/s12245-017-0142-y Robinson T, 2001, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V77,