Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

The Deconstruction of Women Image Through Advertising

Pages
429–439
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Specifically, findings have concluded that most of the advertisements purposely promote objectification of women to preclude their individual advancement in the society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – In our daily lives, we are faced with millions of products/services that are waiting to be consumed and ads are trying to govern individuals’ perception by using themes such as luxury, fantasy, beauty, attraction, entertainment and irritation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The portrayal of women in advertising has been believed to be the one of the most powerful images which is mostly used as an object- for increasing effectiveness, awareness, recall power and sales rate of the products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Specifically, findings have concluded that most of the advertisements purposely promote objectification of women to preclude their individual advancement in the society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – In our daily lives, we are faced with millions of products/services that are waiting to be consumed and ads are trying to govern individuals’ perception by using themes such as luxury, fantasy, beauty, attraction, entertainment and irritation. The goal of this study is to focus on advertising communication process through advertisement content creation as an effective tool. It is also necessary to draw attention to the importance of advertising content subjects and to argue how women are trivialized, underrepresented and objectified in advertising. Design/methodology/approach – This study is constructed through a qualitative analysis which uses convenient sampling method. The purpose of the study is to underline and advance theory, research and practice regarding the image of women as incompetent, useless, sexual objects and likened to a meta in advertisements from different sectors. Findings – It has been recognized through literature that various images in advertising has more impact power rather than the rest of the images. The portrayal of women in advertising has been believed to be the one of the most powerful images which is mostly used as an object- for increasing effectiveness, awareness, recall power and sales rate of the products. Specifically, findings have concluded that most of the advertisements purposely promote objectification of women to preclude their individual advancement in the society. Discussion – Objectification is an ethical concern that needs to be sensitively criticized and debated about “how the women should be portrayed?”. Specifically, advertising industry should consider effectively reproducing the image of ‘women’ according to society’s values and should not to represent their image in negative formats.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAZIT, D. Z. (2020). The Deconstruction of Women Image Through Advertising. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 429–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/203568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ackerberg, D. A. (2001). Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising, Journal of Economics, 32(2), 316-333.
  2. Adams, C. J. (2016). The Carol J. Adams Reader: Writing and Conversations 1995-2015,
  3. USA, Bloomsburry Pub. Barnes Jr., J. H. and Dotson, M. J. (1990). An exploratory investigation into the nature of offensive television advertising, Journal of Advertising, 19 (September), 61–69.
  4. Bearden, W. & Etzel, M. (1982). Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September),183-194.
  5. Belch, G. & Belch, M. (2012). Advertising and Promotion an Integrated Marketing Communication, 9th ed., New York, McGraw-Hill. BelkaouI, A. and Belkaoui, J. M. (1976). A Comparative analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Print Advertisements: 1958, 1970, 1972, Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May). 168-172.
  6. Bernard, P., Gervais, S., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S. and Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis, Psychological Science, 23. 469–471.
  7. Biasia, F. Lurzer’s intertnational archive advertising worldwide, https://www.luerzersarchive.com/en/magazine/print-detail/francesco-biasia-21282.html, date of access, September 13, 2019.
  8. Boddewyn, J. J. (2013.) Controlling sex and decency in advertising around the world, Journal of Advertising, 20(4). 25-35.
  9. Booth, Paul (2010).
  10. Digital Fandom New Media Studies, New York, Peter Lang Pub. Bordo, Susan (1989). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist approppriation of Foucault, Jaggar, A. and Bordo, S. (Ed), Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstruction of Being and Knowing, London, Rutgers University Press, 13-33.
  11. Botterill, J., Macrury, I. and Richards, B. (2013).
  12. The Dynamics of Advertising, London, Kindle Edition Routledge. Cammaerts, Bart (2011). Disruptive sharing in a digital age: Rejecting neoliberalism?, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 25(1), 47-62.
  13. Courtney, A. F. and Lockeretz, S. W. (1971). A Woman's Place: Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements, Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (1), 92-95.
  14. Cutler, B. D. & Javalgi, R. G. (1993). Analysis of Print Ad Features: Services Versus Products, Journal of Advertising Research, 33 (March/April), 62-69.
  15. Davies, E. (2012). Successful Marketing in a Week: Teach Yourself, London, Hodder Education. Dines, G., Jensen, R. & Gusso, A. (1998). Pornography: The Pr