Journals / Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

FROM REGİME SECURİTY TO HUMAN SECURİTY İN MİDDLE EAST: JORDAN SAMPLE

ORTADOĞU'DA REJİM GÜVENLİĞİNDEN İNSAN GÜVENLİĞİNE:ÜRDÜN ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
106–137
Publication Date
2016-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the motivation of prioritizing regime security and human security in Jordan will be examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Jordan, which was a colony of Great Britain until Second World War and gained independence after the war, is a sample of third world state with its weak economy, weak institutional capacity and weak socio-political cohesion between state and society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the contrary, Jordan, with its security strategies becomes alternative to general third world security theories.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the motivation of prioritizing regime security and human security in Jordan will be examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Ürdün · Ortadoğu · Üçüncü Dünya Güvenliği

Abstract

Jordan, which was a colony of Great Britain until Second World War and gained independence after the war, is a sample of third world state with its weak economy, weak institutional capacity and weak socio-political cohesion between state and society. Third world states make the regime security’s reference object of security in their security policies. On the contrary, Jordan, with its security strategies becomes alternative to general third world security theories. By being an only Middle Eastern member of Human Security Network, which aims to take forward Human Security notion, Jordan distinguishes from the other Middle East and third world states. In this article, the motivation of prioritizing regime security and human security in Jordan will be examined.

Özet

ÖZETOrtadoğu’da Büyük Britanya sömürgesi iken İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası bağımsızlığını kazanmış olan Ürdün; zayıf ekonomisi, yetersiz kurumsal altyapısı ve toplum ile devlet arasındaki sosyo-politik oydaşmanın zayıflığı sebepleriyle bir üçüncü dünya ülkesi örneğidir. Üçüncü dünya ülkeleri, rejimi güvenliğin referans nesnesi haline getiren bir güvenlik konseptine sahiptir. Bu noktada bir üçüncü dünya ülkesi olması açısından Ürdün, uygulamaya çalıştığı güvenlik stratejisi ile hâkim üçüncü dünya güvenlik teorilerine bir alternatif oluşturmaktadır. İnsan güvenliği kavramını daha ileri bir noktaya taşımak için kurulan İnsan Güvenliği Ağı’na üye olan tek Ortadoğulu devlet olması açısından Ürdün, güvenlik politikası olarak rejim güvenliğinden insan güvenliğine geçişi ile Ortadoğu’daki diğer devletlerden ve benzeri üçüncü dünya ülkelerinden ayrılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada da Ürdün’ün rejim güvenliği ve insan güvenliğini önceleyen politikalarının ardındaki motivasyonlar incelenmeye çalışılacaktır. ABSTRACT Jordan which was a colony of Great Britain until Second World War and gained independence after the war, is a sample of third world state with its weak economy, weak institutional capacity and weak socio-political cohesion between state and society. Third world states make the regime security reference object of security in their security policies. On the contrary, Jordan, with its security strategies becomes alternative to general third world security theories. By being an only Middle Eastern member of Human Security Network, which aims to take forward Human Security notion, Jordan distinguishes from the other Middle East and third world states. In this article the motivation of prioritizing regime security and human security in Jordan will be examined.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çiftçi, S. E. (2016). FROM REGİME SECURİTY TO HUMAN SECURİTY İN MİDDLE EAST: JORDAN SAMPLE. Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 106–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/202845

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Rumman, Mohamed A.A., “Ürdün’de 1989-2005 Arası Demokratik Dönüşüm”, Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2009.
  2. Acharya, Amitav, “Regionalism and Regime Security in the Third World: Comparing the Origins of the ASEAN and the GCC”, Brian L. Job (Ed.), The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States içinde (s. 143-164), Colarado: Lynne Rienner Publisher,1992.
  3. Acharya, Amitav, “The Periphery as the Core: The Third World and Security Studies”, Strategies in Conflict: Critical Approaches to Security Studies Conference 1994, Toronto, 1995, March, ss. 1-19. Ağır Bülent S., “European Perspective of Human Security: From a Conception to Reality?”, Ivica Dordevic, Marina Glamotchak, Svetlana Stanarevic ve Jasmına Gacic (Ed.), Twenty Years of Human Security: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications, Belgrad: University of Belgrad ve Institut Français de Geopolitique-Universite Paris 8,2015.
  4. Ağır, Bülent S., Gürsoy, Barış ve Arman, Murat N., “European Perspective of Human Security and the Western Balkans”, Revista de Stiinte Politice, 2016, 50, ss. 41-54.
  5. Ayoob, Mohammed, “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism”, International Studies Review, 2002, 4(3), ss. 27-48.
  6. Ayoob, Mohammed, “Security in the Third World: The Worm about to Turn?”, International Affairs, 1983, 60(1), ss. 44-51.
  7. Ayoob, Mohammed, “The Security Problematic of the Third World”, World Politics, 1991, 43(2), ss. 257-283.
  8. Ayoob, Mohammed, “The Third World in the System of States: Acute Schizophrenia or Growing Pains?”, International Studies Quarterly, 1989, 33(1), ss. 67-79.
  9. Bajpai, Kanti, “The Idea of Human Security”, International Studies, 2003, 40(3), ss. 195-228.
  10. Barnett, Michael ve Wendt, Alexander, “The Systemic Sources of Dependent Militarization”, Brian L. Job (Ed.), The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States içinde (s. 97-119), Colarado: Lynne Rienner Publisher,1992.
  11. Beck, Martin ve Hüser, Simone, “Jordan and the ‘Arab Spring’: No Challenge, No Change?”, Middle East Critique, 2015, 24(1), ss. 83-97.
  12. Buzan, Barry, People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations, New York: University of North Carolina Press,1983.
  13. Cardenas, Sonia ve Flibbert, Andrew, “National Human Rights Institutions in the Middle East”, Middle East Journal, 2005, 59(3), ss. 411-436.
  14. Csicsmann, Laszlo, “Responsible Freedom and National Security: Liberalisation and De-Liberalis