Journals / Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Parental Perception of Terminology of Disorders of Sex Development in Western Turkey

Pages
216–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest therefore that local committees including medical professionals, patients and families should be employed to develop proper terminology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Disorders of sex development (DSD) is a nomenclature intended to defeat the discomfort of families and patients and has found worldwide usage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The records of the DSD council (multidisciplinary team where each patient with DSD is discussed) between years 2008-2015 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest therefore that local committees including medical professionals, patients and families should be employed to develop proper terminology.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Disorders of sex development (DSD) is a nomenclature intended to defeat the discomfort of families and patients and has found worldwide usage. The aim of this study was to address the perception and usage of terminology among the parents of DSD patients in a tertiary center in western Turkey. Methods: The records of the DSD council (multidisciplinary team where each patient with DSD is discussed) between years 2008-2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Data including details of the management process, patient characteristics and follow-up details were noted. Then inquiries reflecting parental perception about terminology were implemented during clinical visits. Results: In total, 121 patients were evaluated in monthly meetings of the DSD council and 79 inquiries were completed. Fifty-one percent of the families admitted knowing the terms DSD, ambiguous genitalia, “dubious genitals” and intersex. However, only 2% preferred using DSD, 6% intersex and 14% ambiguous genitalia. Fifty-two percent of the parents used a disease name in Latin (mostly hypospadias) addressing the disorder. The offspring of 69% of the parents who were familiar with the name “dubious genitals” were diagnosed in the neonatal period. The preferred terminology used by parents was strongly associated with the terminology used most commonly in the medical speciality their child most often attended. Conclusion: Each country has its own social norms. We suggest therefore that local committees including medical professionals, patients and families should be employed to develop proper terminology.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİ, S., TEKİN, A., YAĞMUR, İ., ÖZEN, S., ÖZBARAN, B., ŞİMŞEK, R. D. G., DARCAN, Ş., ULMAN, İ., AVANOĞLU, A. (2018). Parental Perception of Terminology of Disorders of Sex Development in Western Turkey. Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 216–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/202531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA; Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society/European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. J Pediatr Urol 2006;2:148-162. Epub 2006 May 23 Feder EK, Karkazis K. What’s in a name? The controversy over “disorders of sex development.” Hastings Cent Rep 2008;38:33-36.
  2. Davies JH, Knight EJ, Savage A, Brown J, Malone PS. Evaluation of terminology used to describe disorders of sex development. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:412-415. Epub 2010 Aug 14 Topp SS. Against the quiet revolution: The rhetorical construction of intersex individuals as disordered. Sexualities. 2013;16:180-194. Magritte E. Working together in placing the long term interests of the child at the heart of the DSD evaluation. J Pediatr Urol 2012;8:571-575. Epub 2012 Sep 12 Davis G. “DSD is a perfectly fine term”: Reasserting mediacal authority through a shift in intersex terminology. In: McGann PJ, Hutson DJ (eds). Advances in Medical Sociology - Sociology of Diagnosis. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2011;155-182. Davis G. The power in a name: diagnostic terminology and diverse experiences. Psychol Sex 2013;1:15-27.
  3. Rolston AM, Gardner M, Vilain E, Sandberg DE. Parental reports of stigma associated with child’s disorder of sex development. Int J Endocrinol 2015;2015:980121. Zainuddin AA, Mahdy ZA. The Islamic Perspectives of GenderRelated Issues in the Management of Patients With Disorders of Sex Development. Arch Sex Behav 2017;46:353-360. Epub 2016 Apr 21 Hughes IA, Nihoul-Fékété C, Thomas B, Cohen-Kettenis PT. Consequences of the ESPE/LWPES guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of disorders of sex development. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;21:351-365.
  4. Warne GL, Raza J. Disorders of sex development (DSDs), their presentation and management in different cultures. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2008;9:227-236. Epub 2008 Jul 17 Affairs SSC on C. Community Affairs References Committee [Internet]. Involuntary or coerced sterilisation of intersex people in Australia. 2013. p. 14. Available from: http://parlinfo.aph. gov.au/parlInfo/ search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22 publications%2Ftabledpapers%2F70936%22 Lee PA, Wisniewski AB, Baskin L, Vogiatzi MG, Vilain E, Rosenthal SM, Houk C. Advances in diagnosis and care of persons with DSD over the last decade. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2014;2014:19. Lin-Su K, Lekarev O, Poppas DP, Vogiatzi MG. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia patient perception of “