Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 6

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Surgical treatment results for flexible flatfoot in adolescents

Pages
655–659
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Idiopathicflexible pes planus (IFPP) is a common foot problem in adolescents and youngadults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hypothesis for the present study was that combination of procedures for IFPP can achieve resultsin adolescents and young adults that are as good as those seen in adult-acquired pes planovalgus (AAPP)treatment in adults.Methods: A total of 21 feet of 18 patients (10 boys, 8 girls) with mean age of 15.6 years underwent surgicalreconstruction forflatfoot deformity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Idiopathicflexible pes planus (IFPP) is a common foot problem in adolescents and youngadults. Hypothesis for the present study was that combination of procedures for IFPP can achieve resultsin adolescents and young adults that are as good as those seen in adult-acquired pes planovalgus (AAPP)treatment in adults.Methods: A total of 21 feet of 18 patients (10 boys, 8 girls) with mean age of 15.6 years underwent surgicalreconstruction forflatfoot deformity. Symptomatic patients who had been unresponsive to conservativetreatment were included in study group. Mean follow-up time was 39.2 months. American OrthopedicFoot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were calculated for all patients, and based onŞnal results, allfamilies were asked whether or not they would elect to have the surgery again in same circumstances.Results: All procedures were performed by the same surgeon: lateral column calcaneal lengtheningosteotomy on 21 feet; percutaneous lengthening or gastrocnemius recession for Achilles tendon on 21feet; medializing calcaneal osteotomy on 15 feet;flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer on 15 feet;medial cuneiform opening wedge osteotomy on 5 feet, spring ligament plication on 3 feet, and accessorynavicular bone excision on 2 feet.Preoperative mean AOFAS score increased signiŞcantly from 56.76 to 95.29. All parents stated that theywere satisŞed with surgery results and would choose to have the same surgery performed again.Conclusion: Soft tissue and bony procedures used for reconstruction of AAPP can be used safely for IFPPin adolescents and young adults.Level of clinical evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

YONTARA, N. S., ÖĞÜT, T., GÜVEN, M. F., BOTANLIOĞLU, H., KAYNAK, G., CAN, A. (2016). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 6, 655–659. https://ajindex.com/articles/202458

References (16)

  1. Blitz NM, Stabile RJ, Giorgini RJ, DiDomenico LA. Flexible pediatric and adolescent pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:59e77
  2. Yeagerman SE, Cross MB, Positano R, Doyle SM. Evaluation and treatment of symptomatic flatfoot. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23:60e67
  3. Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop. 2010;4: 107e121
  4. Manusov EG, Lillegard WA, Raspa RF, Epperly TD. Evaluation of pediatric foot problems: Part II. The hindfoot and the ankle. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54: 1012e1026
  5. Rome K, Ashford RL, Evans A. Non-surgical interventions for paediatric pes planus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7:CD006311
  6. Roth S, Sestan B, Tudor A, Ostojic Z, Sasso A, Durbesic A. Minimally invasive calcaneo-stop method for idiopathic, flexible pes planovalgus in children. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:991e995
  7. Jay RM, Din N. Correcting pediatric flatfoot with subtalar arthroereisis and gastrocnemius recession: a retrospective study. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6: 101e107
  8. Oh I, Williams BR, Ellis SJ, Kwon DJ, Deland JT. Reconstruction of the symptomatic idiopathic flatfoot in adolescents and young adults. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:225e232
  9. Akimau P, Flowers M. Medium term outcomes of planovalgus foot correction in children using a lateral column lengthening approach with additional procedures ‘a la carte’. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:26e29
  10. Roye Jr DP, Raimondo RA. Surgical treatment of the child's and adolescent's flexible flatfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2000;17:515e530
  11. Haddad SL, Mann R. Flatfoot deformity in adults. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL, eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007:1033e1039
  12. D'Amico JC. The flat-footed child-to treat or not to treat: what is the clinician to do? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:386e393
  13. Harris EJ. The natural history and pathophysiology of flexible flatfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:1e23
  14. Moraleda L, Salcedo M, Bastrom TP, Wenger DR, Albinana J, Mubarak SJ. ~ Comparison of the calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform osteotomies and the calcaneal lengthening osteotomy in the surgical treatment of symptomatic flexible flatfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:821e829
  15. Yarmel D, Mote G, Treaster A. The Cotton osteotomy: a technical guide. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48:506e512
  16. Templin D, Jones K, Weiner DS. The incorporation of allogenic and autogenous bone graft in healing of lateral column len