Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

İkinci trimester umblikal kord sarmal indeksi ve perinatal sonuçları

Second trimester umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcomes

Pages
135–142
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONS: There was measured correlation between umbilical cord diameter and aUCI between 18-24 weeks and perinatal outcome but new prospective studies about umbilical artery morphology and perinatal outcomes are also needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Umbilical cord usually seems simple functionally and structurally but it's the life link be- tween fetus and mother that was critically important for growing fetus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: 221 patients with singleton, alive pregnancies between 18-24 gestational weeks were included in our study and have been evaluated prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONS: There was measured correlation between umbilical cord diameter and aUCI between 18-24 weeks and perinatal outcome but new prospective studies about umbilical artery morphology and perinatal outcomes are also needed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Umbilical cord usually seems simple functionally and structurally but it's the life link be- tween fetus and mother that was critically important for growing fetus. The aim of this study is to evalu- ate the effect of early umbilical cord coiling index on perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: 221 patients with singleton, alive pregnancies between 18-24 gestational weeks were included in our study and have been evaluated prospectively. Patients’ age, obstetric history, BMI before pregnancy, history of smoking was registered. Umbilical arter coiling index was also calculated. Perinatal problems such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mel- litus (GDM), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), small for gestational age (SGA) and birth weight, ges- tational age at birth, and newborn intensive care unit need were recorded. RESULTS: There was a negative correlation between antenatal umbilical cord coiling index (aUCI) and gestational age. The birth weights were lower in patients with hypocoiled umbilical cord structure. Preeclampsia was seen in 3.93% of patients with normal aUCI, 26.09 % in hypocoiling group, and 21.05 % in hypercoiling group. The percentage of patients with normal aUCI who had GDM is 2.18, 13.04% of patients with hypercoiling and 10.53% of patients with hypocoiling had GDM. The percentage of patients with normal aUCI who had IUGR is 3.49, 21.74% of patients with hypercoiling and 5.26% of patients with hypocoiling had IUGR. According to aUCI there was a statistical difference in GDM, preeclampsia and IUGR and different from the literature, in our study, we found a statistically significant difference in hy- percoiled umbilical cords in terms of preeclampsia. Newborns with hypercoiling or hypocoiling were needed more neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: There was measured correlation between umbilical cord diameter and aUCI between 18-24 weeks and perinatal outcome but new prospective studies about umbilical artery morphology and perinatal outcomes are also needed.

Özet

AMAÇ: Umblikal kord, fetüs ile plasenta arasındaki ilişkiyi sağ- layan, hem yapısal hem de fonksiyonel olarak basit görülen, ancak gelişmekte olan fetüsün yaşamında kritik bir rol üstle- nen yaşam bağıdır. Çalışmamızın amacı perinatal sonuçları öngörmede erken dönemde bakılan umblikal kord sarmal sayı indeksinin önemini araştırmaktır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmaya gebe polikliniğine başvuran 18-24. gestasyonel haftalarda tek, canlı gebeliği olan 271 ge- be dahil edildi ve prospektif olarak izlendi. Hastaların yaş, obstetrik hikayesi, bu gebeliğinde sigara kulla- nıp kullanmadığı ve gebelik öncesi beden kitle indeksi (BKI) değerleri kaydedildi. Antenatal umblikal sarmal sayı indeksi (aUCI) hesaplaması yapıldı. Bu gebeler izlenerek preeklamp- si, GDM, intrauterin gelişme kısıtlılığı (IUGR), gestasyonel ya- şa göre küçük fetus (SGA) gelişip gelişmediği ayrıca doğum ki- losu, doğum şekli, doğum yaptığı hafta, yenidoğan yoğun ba- kım ihtiyacı olup olmadığı, 5. dakika apgar skoru kaydedildi. BULGULAR: Antenatal kordon sarma endeksi (aUCİ) ve ge- belik yaşı arasında negatif korelasyon. Hiposarmal umblikal kordon yapısı olan hastalarda doğum kilosu anlamlı olarak da- ha azdı. Sarmal sayı indeksi normal olanların preeklampsi ora- nı %3,93 iken, hiposarmal olanlarda %26,09, hipersarmal olan- larda %21,05 olduğu bulundu. Sarmal sayı indeksi normal olanların GDM oranı %2,18 iken, hiposarmal olanlarda %13,04, hipersarmal olanlarda %10,53 olduğu bulundu. Sarmal sayı indeksi normal olanların IUGR oranı %3,49 iken, hiposarmal olanlarda %21.74, hipersarmal olanlarda %5,26 ol- duğu bulunmuştur. Sarmal sayı indeksine göre; GDM, preek- lampsi ve IUGR yönünden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu bulundu (p<0,05). Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ihtiyacı açı- sında sarmal sayı indeksi yönünden yapılan karşılaştırmada hiposarmal olanlarla, hipersarmal olanlarda yoğun bakım ihti- yacı fazla bulundu. SONUÇ: Sonuçta bizim bulgularımız 18-24 hafta arası umbli- kal kord kalınlığı, sarmal sayı indeksinin ölçülmesinin perinatal sonuçları öngörmede önemli olabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Ancak bunun önemini belirlemek için daha geniş kapsamlı ça- lışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOHMA, Y. A., ALTAY, M. M., TURGUT, D., COŞKUN, S., ÜNLÜBİLGİN, E., ESİN, S., GELİŞEN, O., EROL, O. (2014). İkinci trimester umblikal kord sarmal indeksi ve perinatal sonuçları. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 135–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/201622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Fleischer.A.C, Manning F.A, Jeanty.P, Romero R. Obstetrik ve Jinekolojide Sonografi. Ulusal Tıp Kitabevi. İstanbul 1996:203-23. 2.Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001
  2. Çiçek MN, Akyürek C, Çelik Ç, Haberal A. Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi. Güneş Kitabevi. Ankara. 2006:343-351. 4.Bruch JF, Sibony O, Benali K, Challer C, Blot P, Nessmann C. Computerized microscope morphometry of umbilical vessels from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Hum Pathol 1997
  3. 45 5.Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Maymon E, Mueller MD, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a lean umbilical cord: a simple marker for the fetus at risk of being small for gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999
  4. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V, Lanzillotti G, et al. Umbilical vein blood flow in fetuses with normal and lean umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001
  5. Strong TH Jr, Elliott JP, Radin TG. Non-coiled umbilical blood vessels: a new marker for the fetus at risk. Obstet Gynecol 1993
  6. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Duerig P, Travaglini M, Buttarelli M, Raio L. Sonographic atypical vascular coiling of the um- bilical cord Prenat Diagn 2005
  7. 25(1):1-6 9.Qin Y, Lau TK, Rogers MS. Second-trimester ultrasono- graphic assessment of the umbilical coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
  8. 20(5):458-63. 10.Lacro RV, Jones KL, Benirschke K. The umbilical cord twist: origin, direction, and relevance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987
  9. Roach MR. The Umbilical vessels.In Perinatol Medicine
  10. The basic science underlying clinical practice. Goodwin JW, Godden JO, Chance GW. Williams &Wilkins: Baltimore 1987
  11. Edmonds HW. The spiral twist of the normal umbilical cord in twins and in singletons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959
  12. Strong TH Jr, Jarles DL,Vega JS, Feldman DB. The um- bilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994
  13. Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA. Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 1995
  14. Ezimokhai M, Rizk DE, Thomas L. Maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol 2000
  15. Degani S, Lewingsky RM, Berger H, Spiegel D. Sonographic estimation of umbilical coiling index and correlation with Doppler flow character