Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Xiao-Quan Xu

Utility of histogram analysis of ADC maps for differentiating orbital tumors

Pages
161–167
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

ADC10 has the potential to be the most significant parameter for predicting malignant orbital tumors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to evaluate the role of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for differentiating benign and malignant orbital tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Fifty-two patients with orbital tumors were enrolled from March 2013 to November 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:ADC10 has the potential to be the most significant parameter for predicting malignant orbital tumors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the role of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for differentiating benign and malignant orbital tumors. METHODS Fifty-two patients with orbital tumors were enrolled from March 2013 to November 2014. Pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging was performed on a 3T magnetic resonance scanner with b factors of 0 and 800 s/mm2 , and the corresponding ADC maps were generated. Whole-tumor regions of interest were drawn on all slices of the ADC maps to obtain histogram parameters, including ADCmean, ADCmedian, standard deviation (SD), skewness, kurtosis, quartile, ADC10, ADC25, ADC75, and ADC90. Histogram parameter differences between benign and malignant orbital tumors were compared. The diagnostic value of each significant parameter in predicting malignant tumors was established. RESULTS Age, ADCmean, ADCmedian, quartile, kurtosis, ADC10, ADC25, ADC75, and ADC90 parameters were significantly different between benign and malignant orbital tumor groups, while gender, location, SD, and skewness were not significantly different. The best diagnostic performance in predicting malignant orbital tumors was achieved at the threshold of ADC10=0.990 (AUC, 0.997; sensitivity, 96.2%; specificity, 100%). CONCLUSION Histogram analysis of ADC maps holds promise for differentiating benign and malignant orbital tumors. ADC10 has the potential to be the most significant parameter for predicting malignant orbital tumors.

🔖

Cite This Article

XU, X., HU, H., Guo, S., LİU, H., HONG, X., SHİ, H., WU, F. (2016). Xiao-Quan Xu. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 161–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/201513

References (13)

  1. Goh PS, Gi MT, Charlton A, et al. Review of or- bital imaging. Eur J Radiol 2008
  2. [CrossRef] Xian J, Zhang Z, Wang Z, et al. Value of MR imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant orbital tumors in adults. Eur Radiol 2010
  3. [CrossRef] Ben Simon GJ, Annunziata CC, Fink J, et al. Re- thinking orbital imaging establishing guide- lines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in pa- tients with orbital tumors. Ophthalmology 2005
  4. [CrossRef] Xu XQ, Cheng QG, Zu QQ, et al. Comparative study of the relative signal intensity on DWI, FLAIR, and T2 images in identifying the onset time of stroke in an embolic canine model. Neurol Sci 2014
  5. [CrossRef] Sepahdari AR, Aakalu VK, Kapur R, et al. MRI of orbital cellulitis and orbital abscess: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roent- genol 2009
  6. W244-250. [CrossRef] Kapur R, Sepahdari AR, Mafee MF, et al. MR imaging of orbital inflammatory syndrome, or- bital cellulitis, and orbital lymphoid lesions: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009
  7. [CrossRef] de Graaf P, Pouwels PJ, Rodjan F, et al. Sin- gle-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging for retinoblastoma: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012
  8. [CrossRef] Politi LS, Forghani R, Godi C, et al. ocular ad- nexal lymphoma: diffusion-weighted MR im- aging for differential diagnosis and therapeu- tic monitoring. Radiology 2010
  9. [CrossRef] Sepahdari AR, Kapur R, Aakalu VK, et al. Diffu- sion-weighted imaging of malignant ocular masses: initial results and directions for further study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012
  10. [CrossRef] Sepahdari AR, Aakalu VK, Setabutr P, et al. Indeterminate orbital masses: restricted dif- fusion at MR imaging with echo-planar diffu- sion-weighted imaging predicts malignancy. Radiology 2010
  11. [CrossRef] Lope LA, Hutcheson KA, Khademian ZP. Magnetic resonance imaging in the analysis of pediatric orbital tumors: utility of diffu- sion-weighted imaging. J AAPOS 2010
  12. [CrossRef] Razek AA, Elkhamary S, Mousa A. Differenti- ation between benign and malignant orbital tumors at 3-T diffusion MR imaging. Neurora- diology 2011
  13. [CrossRef] Ahn SJ, Choi SH, Kim YJ, et al. Histogram anal- ysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high B-value diffusion MR imag- ing in head and neck squamous cell carcino-