Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

The Value of Fibrosis Index in Discrimination of Chronic Hepatitis and Cirrhosis

Kronik Hepatit ve Siroz Ayrımında Fibrozis İndeksinin Değeri

Pages
212–215
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Fibrosis index may be valuable in monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis and may be helpful in selecting patients who require biopsy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the value of Doppler ultrasonography (US) and fibrosis index in differentiating between chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:­ Sixty-seven non-cirrhotic viral hepatitis B and C patients and 28 cirrhotic patients were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Fibrosis index may be valuable in monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis and may be helpful in selecting patients who require biopsy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the value of Doppler ultrasonography (US) and fibrosis index in differentiating between chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Methods:­ Sixty-seven non-cirrhotic viral hepatitis B and C patients and 28 cirrhotic patients were included in this study. All patients were examined by liver Doppler US. Quantitative Doppler parameters were obtained and fibrosis index was calculated. The results were evaluated statistically and a cut-off value for fibrosis index was obtained to differentiate between chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis groups. Results: The mean fibrosis index value in chronic hepatitis group and cirrhotic patients was 3.23±0.85 and 5.40±1.8, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Taking a cut-off value of 4.57 for fibrosis index, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 71% were obtained. Conclusion: Fibrosis index may be valuable in monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis and may be helpful in selecting patients who require biopsy.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik hepatit ve siroz ayrımında Doppler ultrasonografi (US) ve fibrozis indeksinin değerini araştırmaktır.Yöntemler:­ Bu çalışmaya 67 hepatit B ve C'si olan ancak siroz gelişmeyen hasta ve 28 siroz hastası katıldı. Tüm hastalara karaciğere yönelik Doppler US yapıldı. Kantitatif Doppler parametreleri elde edildi ve fibrozis indeksi hesaplandı. Sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı ve kronik hepatit ve siroz gruplarını ayırmak için fibrozis indeks eşik değeri elde edildi.Bulgular: Kronik hepatit hasta grubunda fibrozis indeks değeri ortalama 3,23±0,85 bulundu. Siroz hasta grubunda ise fibrozis indeks değeri ortalama 5,40±1,8 bulundu. Her iki grup arasında fibrozis indeksleri açısından anlamlı farklılık mevcuttu (p<0,05). Fibrozis indeks eşik değeri 4,57 seçildiğinde duyarlılık %97, özgüllük ise %71 bulundu. Sonuç: Fibrozis indeksi kronik hepatit hastalarının takibinde ve biyopsi yapılacak hastaların seçiminde faydalı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖKER, G., GÜLEK, B., ÖZTÜRK, A. B., YILMAZ, C., KARABIYIK, Ö., AKIN, M. A., KAYA, Ö., DİLEK, O. (2017). The Value of Fibrosis Index in Discrimination of Chronic Hepatitis and Cirrhosis. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 212–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/201439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Davoudi Y, Layegh P, Sima H, Tatari S, Faghani R. Diagnostic Value of Conventional and Doppler Ultrasound Findings in Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Viral Hepatitis. J Med Ultrasound 2015;23:123-8
  2. Soker G, Bahadir Ozturk A, Gulek B, Kuscu F, Bilge Doğan U, Yilmaz C. Doppler ultrasonography helps discriminate between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with viral B and C hepatitis. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016;97:339-45
  3. Bernatik T, Strobel D, Hahn EG, Becker D. Doppler measurements: a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:383-7
  4. Iliopoulos P, Vlychou M, Karatza C, et al. Ultrasonography in differentiation between chronic viral hepatitis and compensated early stage cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:2072-9
  5. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M, Marino B, Zuccoli E, Conte D. Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection--analysis of 300 cases. Radiology 2003;227:89-94
  6. Kok T, van der Jagt EJ, Haagsma EB, Bijleveld CM, Jansen PL, Boeve VJ. The value of Doppler ultrasound in cirrhosis andportal hypertension. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1999;230:82-8
  7. McNaughton DA, Abu-Yousef MM. Doppler US of the liver made simple. Radiographics 2011;31:161-88
  8. Murat A, Akarsu S, Cihangiroglu M, Yildirim H, Serhatlioglu S, Kalender O. Assessment of Doppler waveform patterns and flow velocities of hepatic veins in children with acute viral hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006;12:85-9
  9. Koda M, Murawaki Y, Kawasaki H, Ikawa S. Portal blood velocityand portal blood flow in patients with chronic viral hepatitis: relation to histological liver fibrosis. Hepatogastroenterology1996;43:199-202
  10. El-Kabbany ZA, Hamza RT, Abd El Hakim AS, Tawfik LM. Thyroid and hepatichaemodynamic alterations among Egyptian children with liver cirrhosis. ISRN Gastroenterology 2012;2012:595734
  11. Mazaher H, Kashani S, Sharifian H. Fibrosis index: A new Doppler index for differention of cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis. Iran J Radiol 2006;47-10
  12. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995;22:696-9
  13. Piscaglia F, Gaiani S, Calderoni D, et al. Influence of liver fibrosis on hepatic artery Dopplerresistance index in chronic hepatitis of viral origin. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001;36:647- 52
  14. Walsh KM, Leen E, MacSween RN, Morris AJ. Hepatic blood flowchanges in chronic hepatitis C measured by duplex Dopplercolor sonography: relationship to h