Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Development of a spiramycin sensor based on adsorptive stripping linear sweep voltammetry and its application for the determination of spiramycin in chicken egg samples

Pages
463–474
Publication Date
2021-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The extraction technique followed had good recovery values between 85.3 ± 4.0% and 93.4 ± 1.9%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Herein, an adsorptive stripping linear sweep voltammetric technique was described to determine spiramycin, a macrolide antibiotic, using a carboxylic multiwalled glassy carbon electrode modified with carbon nanotubes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the adsorption affinity of spiramycin to the modified surface, the sensitivity of the glassy carbon electrode was significantly increased for the determination of spiramycin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The extraction technique followed had good recovery values between 85.3 ± 4.0% and 93.4 ± 1.9%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spiramycin · macrolide antibiotics · carboxylic multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Abstract

Herein, an adsorptive stripping linear sweep voltammetric technique was described to determine spiramycin, a macrolide antibiotic, using a carboxylic multiwalled glassy carbon electrode modified with carbon nanotubes. The main principle of the analytical methodology proposed was based on the preconcentration of spiramycin by open-circuit accumulation of the macrolide onto the modified electrode surface. As a result of the adsorption affinity of spiramycin to the modified surface, the sensitivity of the glassy carbon electrode was significantly increased for the determination of spiramycin. The electrochemical behavior of spiramycin was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and the irreversible anodic peak observed was measured as an analytical signal in the methodology. The proposed electrochemical sensing platform was quite linear in the range of 0.100–40.0 μM of spiramycin concentration with a correlation coefficient of 0.9993. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were 0.028 and 0.094 μM, respectively. The intra- and interday repeatability of the proposed sensor was within acceptable limits. Finally, the applicability of the electrochemical methodology was examined by determining the drug content of chicken egg samples spiked with spiramycin standard. A rapid and easy extraction technique was performed to extract spiked spiramycin from the egg samples. The extraction technique followed had good recovery values between 85.3 ± 4.0% and 93.4 ± 1.9%.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİTTAN, M. (2021). Development of a spiramycin sensor based on adsorptive stripping linear sweep voltammetry and its application for the determination of spiramycin in chicken egg samples. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 463–474. https://ajindex.com/articles/201323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adhikari BR, 2015, SENSORS-BASEL, V15, P22490, DOI 10.3390/s150922490 Barton MD, 2000, NUTR RES REV, V13, P279, DOI 10.1079/095442200108729106 CHANDRA U, 2011, AM J ANAL CHEM, V2, P262, DOI DOI 10.4236/ajac.2011.22032 Cittan M, 2019, INT J ENVIRON AN CH, V99, P1540, DOI 10.1080/03067319.2019.1625342 Cittan M, 2016,
  2. TALANTA, V159, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.06.021 Delepine B, 1996, J AOAC INT, V79, P397. Drljevic-Djuric KM, 2011, RUSS J ELECTROCHEM+, V47, P781, DOI 10.1134/S1023193511070056 Dubois M, 2001, J CHROMATOGR B, V753, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00542-9 El Sheikh R, 2013, INT J PHARM SCI RES, V4, P2234, DOI 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(6).2234-43 Elkhoudary MM, 2016, J CHROMATOGR SCI, V54, P1701, DOI 10.1093/chromsci/bmw126 Erady V, 2017, MAT SCI ENG C-MATER, V76, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.082 Furusawa N, 1999, J VET MED A, V46, P599, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0442.1999.00247.x Furusawa N, 1999,
  3. TALANTA, V49, P461, DOI 10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00043-0 Mayor MAG, 2017, FOOD CHEM, V221, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.114 Gilbert O, 2009, INT J ELECTROCHEM SC, V4, P582 Gomis DB, 2004, J FOOD SCI, V69, pC415, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb10708.x Horie M, 2003, J FOOD HYG SOC JPN, V44, P150, DOI 10.3358/shokueishi.44.150 Horie M, 1998, J CHROMATOGR A, V812, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00004-1 Hu H, 2001, CHEM PHYS LETT, V345, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00851-X ICH Topic Q2B, 1997, ICH TOP Q2B GUID VAL Juhel-Gaugain M, 1999, J AOAC INT, V82, P1046 Khattab FI, 2011, PORT ELECTROCHIM ACT, V29, P79, DOI 10.4152/pea.201102079 Khattab FI, 2010, DRUG TEST ANAL, V2, P37, DOI 10.1002/dta.83 Kukovecz A, 2002, J PHYS CHEM B, V106, P6374, DOI 10.1021/jp014019f Kuznetsova A, 2001, J AM CHEM SOC, V123, P10699, DOI 10.1021/ja011021b Liang R, 2010, J MED PEST CONTROL, V09. Lin Q, 2018, J PHARMACEUT BIOMED, V149, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.10.041 Maher HM, 2008, J CHROMATOGR B, V876, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.033 Mahmoudi A, 2018, SEP SCI PLUS, V1, P253, DOI 10.1002/sscp.201800014 Mohamed MA, 2019, MICROCHEM J, V147, P555, DOI 10.1016/j.microc.2019.03.057 Mohamed MA, 2018,
  4. TALANTA, V185, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.03.104 Rosca ID, 2005,
  5. CARBON, V43, P3124, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.019 ROUDAUT B, 1990, BRIT POULTRY SCI, V31, P661, DOI 10.1080/00071669008417297 Shetti NP, 2019, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V1051, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.aca.2018.11.041 Shetti NP, 2018, ELECTROCHIM ACTA, V269, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.170 Wan HJ, 20