Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Temel sayı işleme görevleri kullanılarak matematik bozukluğu riskli öğrencilerin belirlenmesi

Using basic number processing tasks in determining students with mathematics disorder risk

Pages
47–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These results showed that the developed screening tool has a potential in effectively determining students with mathematics disorder risks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study investigated whether it was possible to determine the risk of having mathematics disorder with a simple screening tool containing four types of basic number processing tasks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Mathematics Achievement Tests (MAT) and Basic Number Processing Tests (BNPT) were administered to a total of 487 students from first through fourth grade of 12 different elementary schools in Ankara, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These results showed that the developed screening tool has a potential in effectively determining students with mathematics disorder risks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether it was possible to determine the risk of having mathematics disorder with a simple screening tool containing four types of basic number processing tasks. Method: Mathematics Achievement Tests (MAT) and Basic Number Processing Tests (BNPT) were administered to a total of 487 students from first through fourth grade of 12 different elementary schools in Ankara, Turkey. Students with a general learning disorder, mainstreamed students, and students with diagnosis of attention deficit were excluded from the study. Random dot enumeration, canonic dot enumeration, symbolic number comparison and mental number line estimation tasks were used in Basic Number Processing Tests. Based on Mathematics Achievement Test scores, students were grouped into mathematics disorder risk, low achievement, and typical achievement. Students’ Basic Number Processing Tests scores were analyzed one by one in comparison to grade level averages. Results: Based on these comparisons we found that in all four grade levels, students with mathematics disorder risk got scores lower than grade level mean at least in one Basic Number Processing Test. Conclusion: These results showed that the developed screening tool has a potential in effectively determining students with mathematics disorder risks. The tool might also be helpful in early diagnosis and intervention of students with mathematics disorder risk.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, sayı işleme ile ilgili dört çeşit görev içeren basit bir tarama aracı yardımıyla, matematik bozukluğu riskli öğrencilerin belirlenip belirlenemeyeceği araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmada, Türkiye’nin Ankara ilinde bulunan 12 farklı ilkokuldan 1-4. sınıf düzeyindeki 487 öğrenciye Matematik Başarı Testi ve Temel Sayı İşleme Testleri uygulanmıştır. Genel öğrenme bozukluğu, kaynaştırma öğrencisi ve dikkat eksikliği tanısı olanlar çalışmadan dışlanmıştır. Temel Sayı İşleme Testlerinde; rastgele dizilmiş noktaları sayılama, domino dizilmiş noktaları sayılama, sembolik sayı karşılaştırma ve zihinsel sayı doğrusunda tahmin görevleri kullanılmıştır. Öğrenciler; Matematik Başarı Testi puanlarına göre matematik bozukluğu riskli, düşük başarılı ve normal başarılı olmak üzere gruplara ayrılmışlardır. Bu gruplarda bulunan öğrencilerin Temel Sayı İşleme Testi puanları ayrı ayrı sınıf ortalamaları ile karşılaştırılarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Temel Sayı İşleme Testlerinde sınıf ortalamalarına göre yapılan karşılaştırmalarda, dört sınıf düzeyinde de matematik bozukluğu riskli oldukları varsayılan öğrencilerin, en az bir görev türünde ortalamanın altında oldukları bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Bulgular, geliştirilen tarama aracının, matematik bozukluğu riskli olan öğrencileri ayırt etmede etkili olabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışmanın, matematik bozukluğu riskli öğrencilere erken teşhis ve müdahalede bulunabilmek için yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLKUN, S., DENİZLİ, Z. A. (2015). Temel sayı işleme görevleri kullanılarak matematik bozukluğu riskli öğrencilerin belirlenmesi. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 47–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/201296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Geary DC, Hoard MK. Learning Disabilities in Arithmetic and Mathematics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives: In Campbell JID (editor). Handbook of Mathematical Cognition. New York: Psychology Press, 2005, 253-267
  2. Murphy MM, Mazzocco MM, Hanich LB, Early MC. Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. J Learn Disabil 2007; 40:458-478
  3. Butterworth B. The Mathematical Brain. London: MacMillian, 1999, 163-217
  4. Shalev R, Gross-Tsur V. Developmental dyscalculia. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 24:337-342
  5. Barbaresi WJ, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Weaver AL, Jacobsen SJ. Math learning disorder: incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-82, Rochester, Minn. Ambul Pediatr 2005; 5:281-289
  6. Wilson AJ, Dehaene S. Number Sense and Developmental Dyscalculia: In Coch D, Dawson G, Fischer K (editors). Human Behavior, Learning, and the Developing Brain: Atypical Development. New York: Guilford Press, 2007, 1-37
  7. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E. Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8:307-314
  8. Rousselle L, Noel MP. Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition 2007; 102:361-395
  9. Landerl K, Bevan A, Butterworth B. Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition 2004; 93:99-125
  10. Mussolin C, De Volder A, Grandin C, Schlogel X, Nassogne MC, Noel MP. Neural correlates of symbolic number comparison in developmental dyscalculia. J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22:860-874
  11. Gilmore CK, McCarthy SE, Spelke ES. Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition 2010; 115:394-406
  12. Desoete A, Ceulemans A, De Weerdt F, Pieters S. Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten ? Findings from a longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol 2012; 82:64-81
  13. Geary DC, Bailey DH, Littlefield A, Wood P, Hoard MK, Nugent L. First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: a latent class trajectory analysis. Cogn Dev 2009; 24:411-429
  14. Heine A, Tamm S, De Smedt B, Schneider M, Thaler V, Torbeyns J, Stern E, Verschaffel L, Jacobs A. The numerical stroop effect in primary school children: a comparison of low, normal and high achievers. Child Neuropsychol 2010; 16:461-