Journals / Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Addiction Profile Index-Family (BAPY-A): The Study of Validity and Reliability

Aile Ba?ymlylyk Profil Yndeksinin Geli?tirilmesi, Geçerlik Ve Güvenilirliği

Pages
255–262
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Thus,the Addiction Profile Index-Family (BAPY-A) can be usedas a valid and reliable instrument to asses family's abilities to set rules, give responsibility, resolve conflict, andestablish relationship, family bonds and the attitudetowards the addict.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Addiction is a disease that affects the familyand also requires family's participation on treatment.Therefore, determination of the family property will contribute to organize the treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: AddictionProfile Index-Family (BAPY-A) was developed as a scaleconsisting of 10 questions to asess family's abilities toset rules, give responsibility, resolve conflict, family bondand the attitude of the family towards the addict.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Thus,the Addiction Profile Index-Family (BAPY-A) can be usedas a valid and reliable instrument to asses family's abilities to set rules, give responsibility, resolve conflict, andestablish relationship, family bonds and the attitudetowards the addict.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Addiction is a disease that affects the familyand also requires family's participation on treatment.Therefore, determination of the family property will contribute to organize the treatment. Method: AddictionProfile Index-Family (BAPY-A) was developed as a scaleconsisting of 10 questions to asess family's abilities toset rules, give responsibility, resolve conflict, family bondand the attitude of the family towards the addict. BAPYA developed on practiced with parents, spouces andtheir relatives of addicts applied the Addiction Clinic andFamily Assessment Device (ADÖ) were applied. The application was repeated after 15 days. Results: CronbachAlpha coefficient of the scale was found as 0.82. 4 factors explained %30.81 of the total variance wereobtained on explanatory factor analysis. These factorswere named "establish relationship", "family bonds"and "attitude towards the addict". A correlation of 0.52(p<0.01) was found between the average total scores ofADÖ and BAPY-A. The correlation of between pre-testand post-test of BAPY-A was found 0.67 (o<0.01). Whencomparing the scale scores of families that have anaddict member and not, the variance between averagetotal scores was found statistically significant. And alsosimilar findings were obtained when parents, spoucesand other relatives were evaluated. Conclusion: Thus,the Addiction Profile Index-Family (BAPY-A) can be usedas a valid and reliable instrument to asses family's abilities to set rules, give responsibility, resolve conflict, andestablish relationship, family bonds and the attitudetowards the addict.

Özet

Amaç: Ba?ymlylyk aileyi de etkileyen ve tedavide aileninkatylymyny da gerektiren bir hastalyktyr. Bu nedenle aileözelliklerinin saptanmasy, tedavinin düzenlenmesinekatkyda bulunacaktyr. Yöntem: Aile Ba?ymlylyk ProfilYndeksi (BAPY-A) ölçe?i ailenin kural koyma, sorumlulukverme, çaty?ma çözme becerilerini, aile içi ba?lary veailenin ba?ymlyya kar?y tutumunu de?erlendirme amacyyla 10 sorudan olu?an bir ölçek olarak geli?tirilmi?tir.Ba?ymlylyk klini?ine ba?vuran ba?ymlylaryn; ebeveyn, e? vedi?er yakynlaryna geli?tirilen bu ölçek ve AileDe?erlendirme Ölçe?i uygulanmy?tyr. Uygulama 15 günsonra tekrarlanmy?tyr. Bulgular:Ölçe?in Cronbach alfakatsayysy 0.82 bulunmu?tur. Açyklayycy faktör analizindetoplam varyansyn %30,81'ini açyklayan 4 faktör eldeedilmi?tir. Bunlar "ili?kisel beceriler", "aile içi ba?lar" ve"ba?ymlyya kar?y tutum " olarak adlandyrylmy?tyr. Ailede?erlendirme ölçe?i ortalama toplam puany ile BAPY-Aölçe?inin ortalama toplam puany 0,52 (p<0.01)düzeyinde ba?lantyly bulunmu?tur. BAPY-A'nyn ilk ve sontest uygulamalary arasynda korelasyon 0,67 (p<0.01)olarak saptanmy?tyr. Ba?ymly üyesi olan ve olmayanailelerin ölçek puany kar?yla?tyryldy?ynda toplam puanortalamalary arasyndaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlybulunmu?tur. Ba?ymlynyn ebeveyn, e? ve di?er yakynlaryde?erlendirmeye ayryca alyndy?ynda benzer bulgular eldeedilmi?tir. Sonuç: Aile Ba?ymlylyk Profil Yndeksinin (BAPYA), kural koyma, sorumluluk verme ve çaty?ma çözmegibi aile içi ili?kisel becerileri, aile ba?laryny ve yakynlarynba?ymlyya tutumunu ölçen, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçekoldu?u söylenebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖGEL, K., ÇELİKAY, H., BAŞABAK, A. (2017). Addiction Profile Index-Family (BAPY-A): The Study of Validity and Reliability. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 255–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/201187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Tot Ş, Yazıcı K, Yazıcı A, Metin O, Bal, Erdem P. Psychosocial correlates of subs--tance use among adolescents in Mersin, Turkey. Public Health 2004; 118:588--593 (doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2004.02.009)
  2. Barrett AE, Turner RJ. Family structure and substance use problems in adolescence and early adulthood: examining expla-- nations for the relationship. Addiction 2005;101: 109--120 (doi:10.1111/j.1360--0443.2005.01296.x)
  3. Bernburg JG, Thorlindsson T, Sigfusdottir ID. The neighbor-- hood effects of disrupted family processes on adolescent subs tance use. Social Science Medicine 2009; 69: 129--137 (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.025)
  4. Rivera MP, DePaulo D. The role of family support and parental monitoring as media--tors in mexican american adoles-- cent drinking. Substance Use Misuse 2013; 48:1577--1588 (DOI: 10.3109/108260842013.808220
  5. Calafat A, Garcia F, Juan M, Becona E, Fernandez--Hermida JR. Which parenting style is more protective against adolescent substance use?EVidence within the Euro--pean context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2014;138: 185--192 (
  6. Saunders EC, McLeman BM,McGovern MP, Xie H, Lambert--Harris Meier A. The influence of family and social problems on treatment outcomes of persons with co-- occurring substance use disorders and PTSD. Journal of Substance Use 2016; 21(3):237--243 (DOI: 10.3109/1465989120151005184)
  7. Orford J, Templeton L, Copello A, Velleman R, Ibanga A, Binnie C. Increasing the involvement of family members in alco-- hol and drug treatment services: The results of an action research project in two specialist agencies. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2009; 16(5): 379--408 (DOI: 10.1080/09687630802258553)
  8. Önal A, Ogel K, Eke C. Dikkat eksikliği ve hiperaktivite belir-- tileri bulunan ergenlerde madde kullanımı ve aile özellikleri üstüne kesitsel bir çalışma. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 2011; 21(3): 225--231 (DOI: 10.5455/bcp.20110627104419)
  9. Moon SS, Blakey JM, Boyas J, Horton Kim YJ. The influence of parental, peer, and school factors on marijuana use among native american adolescents. Journal of Social Service Research 2014; 40(2): 147--159 (DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2013.865578)
  10. Mak KK, Ho SY, Thomas GN, Schooling CM, McGhee SM, Lam TH. Family struc--ture, parent--child conversation time and substance use among Chinese adolescents. Mak et al. BMC Public Health 2010, 10: 503 (doi:10.1186/1471-2458--10--503)
  11. Atar AÖ, Yalçın Ö, Uygu