SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Awareness / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

DEEP HISTORY OF LIBERALISM: AN APPROACH TO LIBERALISM HISTORY

Fırat BARÇADURMUŞ
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2018-08-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This works handles sophism as a messenger of modern liberalism and the agent in Ancient Greece with “against the aristocratic constitution, criticize sing entrenched thoughts, takes humanity to the center of everything and with pragmatic nascency”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The modern liberalism is a political thought movement which develops by the enlightenment of western.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly it used by Adam Smith as a notion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This works handles sophism as a messenger of modern liberalism and the agent in Ancient Greece with “against the aristocratic constitution, criticize sing entrenched thoughts, takes humanity to the center of everything and with pragmatic nascency”.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Liberalism · Sophism · Socrates

Abstract

The modern liberalism is a political thought movement which develops by the enlightenment of western. Firstly it used by Adam Smith as a notion. Liberalism comes into prominence with dignity and supporting the true things as freedom of religion and conscience, the leadership of mind, determinate countries, private ownership etc.Sophism was born in V. century. Protagoras is the first agent of sophism. Sophism is a philosophical quadrat that which one criticizes aristocratic and entrenched thoughts, takes people in to the center and the top of life by idea of metron antropos panton (human is measure of everything), based on humanity while legislation and implement .sophists suppose the successful person as happy person, gives a pragmatical meaning to life. Generally, we can tell that the sophists have a democratic approach. This works handles sophism as a messenger of modern liberalism and the agent in Ancient Greece with “against the aristocratic constitution, criticize sing entrenched thoughts, takes humanity to the center of everything and with pragmatic nascency”.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARÇADURMUŞ, F. (2018). DEEP HISTORY OF LIBERALISM: AN APPROACH TO LIBERALISM HISTORY. Journal of Awareness, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/200914

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AKDEMIR, F. (2013). Richard Rorty‟nin Pragmatik Liberal Ütopyasında Dinin ĠĢlevi veGeleceği Sorunu. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi III. 31-60. BRITANNICA,T. E. (n.d.). Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved, (22.07.2018) from Nomos: https://www.britannica.com/topic/nomos-Greek-philosophy ÇETIN,H. (2001) “Liberalizmin Temel Ġlkeleri”, C.Ü. Ġktisadi ve Ġdari Bilimler Dergisi, Retrieved (19.08.2017), from: http://eskidergi.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/makale/101.pdf. 219-237
  2. DINDAR, B. Sokrates ve J. P. SartreFelsefesinde Ġnsan. On dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi,1986, s.77-86
  3. EFLATUN. (2009), Sokrates‟in Savunması, Alkım Yayınları, Ġstanbul, ENCYCLOPEDIA. RETRIEVED (22.07.2018) from Nomos And Phusis: https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/nomos-and-phusis
  4. ERDOĞAN, M. (2009). Liberalizme Yeniden BakıĢ: Tarihi ve Felsefi Temelleri. Liberal DüĢünce. 7-31
  5. GAGARIN, M. & WOODRUFF, P. (2003). Early greek political thought from Homer to the Sophists. Cambridge: University Press of Cambridge. GÖZE, A. ( 1983), Siyasal DüĢünce Tarihi, Fakülteler Matbaası, Ġstanbul GÖZE,A. (2007), Siyasal DüĢünceler Ve Yönetimler, Beta Yayınları, Ġstanbul KABAKÇI,E. (2010). Siyasal DüĢünceler Tarihi. Istanbul: ĠÜ AUZEF. KERFERD, G. B. (1981). The Sophistic Movement. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. KYRIAZIS, N., ECONOMOU, E. M., & ZACHILAS, L. (2012). Direct Democracy and Social Contract in Ancient Athens. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 3086-3091.
  6. MULGAN, R. G. (1979). Lycophron and Greek Theories of Social Contract. Journal of the History of Ideas, 121-128. ÖÇAL,ġ. Sofistler ve Sokrates. Retrieved (08.01.2017) from Akademia.edu: https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?hl=tr&q=++SOFĠSTLER+VE+SOKRATES+++ġamil+Öçal&btnG=&lr= adresinden alındı ORALGÜL, E. D. (2017). Sofist ve Filozof Ayrımı IĢığında Antik Felsefe. Flsf. 259-275.
  7. SAUNDERS, T. J. (1977). Antiphon the Sophist on Natural Laws. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 215-236 a ŞENEL, A. (2011), Siyasal DüĢünceler Tarihi, Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, Ankara TÜRE,F. (2006), “Antik Liberalizm mi Yoksa Modern Sofizm mi”, SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi. 23-49
  8. WILLIAM, J. (2005),
  9. Ancient Concept of Philosophy, Taylor & Francis e-Library, London. YETKIN, Ç., (2008), Siyasal DüĢünceler Tarihi 1,Salyangoz Yayınları, Ġstanbul