Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

A new femoral nail with single distal locking screw for maximum interfragment rotational stability

Pages
89–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We determined interfragment rotational displacement of composite femurs with three types of single distal screw nails (10 interlocking nails, 10 compression nails and 10 Mehmet anti-rotation nails compressed by tube) at 6-Nm external- 6 Nm internal and 10 Nm extern- 6 Nm internal torques, which imitating respectively the level walking and descending stairs, using an axial distraction testing machine and a custom designed rotation apparatus.Results: Between 10 Nm external and 6 Nm internal torques with single distal locking screw, the interfragment rotational displacement in the Mehmet nail compressed by the 8 Nm torque wrench was mean 1.14 mm and 540% less than mean 7.31 mm in interlocking nails and 400% less than 5.72 mm in compression nails compressed by the 2.5 Nm torque wrench.Conclusion: The single distal screw Mehmet nail is superior than other single (or even some double) distal screw nails for maximum rotational stability, with no interfragment distraction gap, no superior nail migration, decreased operation time, and less radiation exposure in axially stable transverse and short oblique femur fractures in daily activities like stair descending or level walking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: One of the problems for interlocking nailing of the femur is interfragment rotation motion, affecting fracture healing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigated which single distal screw nail is the best for interfragment rotational stability.Methods: We used a total of 30 composite femurs, ten for each group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We determined interfragment rotational displacement of composite femurs with three types of single distal screw nails (10 interlocking nails, 10 compression nails and 10 Mehmet anti-rotation nails compressed by tube) at 6-Nm external- 6 Nm internal and 10 Nm extern- 6 Nm internal torques, which imitating respectively the level walking and descending stairs, using an axial distraction testing machine and a custom designed rotation apparatus.Results: Between 10 Nm external and 6 Nm internal torques with single distal locking screw, the interfragment rotational displacement in the Mehmet nail compressed by the 8 Nm torque wrench was mean 1.14 mm and 540% less than mean 7.31 mm in interlocking nails and 400% less than 5.72 mm in compression nails compressed by the 2.5 Nm torque wrench.Conclusion: The single distal screw Mehmet nail is superior than other single (or even some double) distal screw nails for maximum rotational stability, with no interfragment distraction gap, no superior nail migration, decreased operation time, and less radiation exposure in axially stable transverse and short oblique femur fractures in daily activities like stair descending or level walking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: One of the problems for interlocking nailing of the femur is interfragment rotation motion, affecting fracture healing. The nails with single distal locking screw are advantageous for decreasing operation time and radiation exposure. We investigated which single distal screw nail is the best for interfragment rotational stability.Methods: We used a total of 30 composite femurs, ten for each group. We determined interfragment rotational displacement of composite femurs with three types of single distal screw nails (10 interlocking nails, 10 compression nails and 10 Mehmet anti-rotation nails compressed by tube) at 6-Nm external- 6 Nm internal and 10 Nm extern- 6 Nm internal torques, which imitating respectively the level walking and descending stairs, using an axial distraction testing machine and a custom designed rotation apparatus.Results: Between 10 Nm external and 6 Nm internal torques with single distal locking screw, the interfragment rotational displacement in the Mehmet nail compressed by the 8 Nm torque wrench was mean 1.14 mm and 540% less than mean 7.31 mm in interlocking nails and 400% less than 5.72 mm in compression nails compressed by the 2.5 Nm torque wrench.Conclusion: The single distal screw Mehmet nail is superior than other single (or even some double) distal screw nails for maximum rotational stability, with no interfragment distraction gap, no superior nail migration, decreased operation time, and less radiation exposure in axially stable transverse and short oblique femur fractures in daily activities like stair descending or level walking.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAARSLAN, A. A., AYCAN, H., ÖRGEN, Y., KARAKAŞLI, A., ERTEM, F., SESLİ, E. (2016). A new femoral nail with single distal locking screw for maximum interfragment rotational stability. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/200501

References (12)

  1. Klein P, Schell H, Streitparth F, Heller M, Kassi JP, Kan- dziora F, et al. The initial phase of fracture healing is spe- cifically sensitive to mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 2003;21:662-9.
  2. Claes L, Eckert-Hübner K, Augat P. The effect of mechani- cal stability on local vascularization and tissue differentia- tion in callus healing. J Orthop Res 2002;20:1099-105.
  3. Gonschorek O, Hofmann GO, Bühren V. Interlocking compression nailing: a report on 402 applications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:430-7.
  4. Klein P, Opitz M, Schell H, Taylor WR, Heller MO, Kassi JP, et al. Comparison of unreamed nailing and external fixa- tion of tibial diastases-mechanical conditions during heal- ing and biological outcome. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1072-8.
  5. Citak M, Kendoff D, Gardner MJ, Oszwald M, O'Loughlin PF, Olivier LC, et al. Rotational stability of femoral osteo- synthesis in femoral fractures - navigated measurements. Technol Health Care 2009;17:25-32.
  6. Uzel AP, Deloumeaux J, Rouvillain JL, Laflamme GY, Du- randeau A, Caix P. Comparative study of femoral diaphyse- al morphometry in two male populations, in France and a French West Indies island: an example of clinical relevance of comparative anatomy for orthopedic practice. Surg Ra- diol Anat 2011;33:235-40.
  7. DiBennardo R, Taylor JV. Sex assessment of the femur: a test of a new method. Am J Phys Anthropol 1979;50:635- 7. Chen AL, Tejwani NC, Joseph TN, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. The effect of distal screw orientation on the intrinsic stabil- ity of a tibial intramedullary nail. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2001- 2002;60:80-3.
  8. Aldemir C, Doğan A, İnci F, Sertkaya Ö, Duygun F. Dis- tal locking techniques without fluoroscopy in intramedul- lar nailing. [Article in Turkish] Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2014;25:64-9.
  9. Dursun M, Kalkan T, Aytekin MN, Celik I, Uğurlu M. Does the magnetic-guided intramedullary nailing tech- nique shorten operation time and radiation exposure? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:1005-11.
  10. Somerson JS, Rowley D, Kennedy C, Buttacavoli F, Agar- wal A. Electromagnetic navigation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for proximal interlocking in retro- grade femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:417-21.
  11. Levin PE, Schoen RW Jr, Browner BD. Radiation expo- sure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedul- lary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:761-6.
  12. George CJ, Lindsey RW, Noble PC, Alexander JW, Ka- maric E. Optimal location of a single distal interlocking screw in intramedullary nailing of distal thi