Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability Study of the Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationships Scale

Romantik İlişkilerde Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
1100–1110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the two-factor structure of the SERRS was confirmed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to adapt the “Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationships Scale”, which was developed by Riggio and Weiser, Valenzuela, Lui, Montes and Heur (2011), into Turkish culture and conduct its validity and reliability study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out with a total of 367 students (243 girls and 124 boys), including senior students attending various departments and receiving pedagogical formation education in Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the two-factor structure of the SERRS was confirmed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Romantik · İlişki · Öz Yeterlik

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt the “Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationships Scale”, which was developed by Riggio and Weiser, Valenzuela, Lui, Montes and Heur (2011), into Turkish culture and conduct its validity and reliability study. The study was carried out with a total of 367 students (243 girls and 124 boys), including senior students attending various departments and receiving pedagogical formation education in Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Education. The two-factor structure of the SERRS was tested with confirmatory factor analysis method. The results showed that the two-factor structure of the SERRS was confirmed. The language validity of the scale was also examined. In addition, “General Self-Efficacy Scale” was used as criterion to determine the concurrent validity of the scale. The reliability of the SERRS was calculated with test-retest reliability coefficient and internal consistency coefficient methods. The results show that the SERRS can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Riggio ve Weiser, Valenzuela, Lui, Montes ve Heur (2011) tarafından geliştirilen “Romantik İlişkilerde Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği”ni (RİÖYÖ) Türk kültürüne uyarlayarak, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasını yapmaktır. Araştırma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi’nde Eğitim Fakültesi’nin çeşitli bölümlerine devam eden lisans 4. sınıf öğrencileri ile pedagojik formasyon eğitimi alan 243’ü kız ve 124’ü erkek olmak üzere toplam 367 kişi ile yürütülmüştür. RİÖYÖ’nin iki faktörlü yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, RİÖYÖ’nin iki faktörlü yapısının doğrulandığını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte ölçeğin dil geçerliği de incelenmiştir. Ayrıca ölçeğin benzer ölçek geçerliğini belirlemek için “Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği” ölçüt olarak kullanılmıştır Ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışması, test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayısı ve iç tutarlılık katsayısı ile hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, RİÖYÖ’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSOYSAL, F. S., BAŞ, A. U., AYSAN, F. (2019). Validity and Reliability Study of the Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationships Scale. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1100–1110. https://ajindex.com/articles/200293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 113-131.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 8, 191–215.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Cui, M., Fincham, F.D. ve Pasley, B.K. (2008). Young adult romantic relationships: The role of parents' marital problems and relationship efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1226–1235. doi:10.1177/0146167208319693. Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T. ve Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 267–285.Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B. ve Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer Mindfulness/Mindlessness Scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11-26.Hu, L. ve Bentler, P.M (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.Lopez, F.G., Morúa, W. ve Rice, K.G. (2007). Factor structure, stability, and predictive validity of college students' relationship self-efficacy beliefs. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40, 80–96.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D.A., Valenzuela, A.M., Lui, P.P., Montes, R. ve Heuer,J.(2013). Self efficacy in romantic relationships: Prediction of relationship attitudes and outcomes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 629–650. doi:10.1080/00224545. 2013.801826.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D., Valenzuela, A., Lui, P., Montes, R. ve Heuer, J. (2011). Initial validation of a measure of self efficacy in romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 601–606. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.026.Schermelleh-Engel. K ve Moosbrugger. H.(2003). Evaluating the fit of stuctural equation models: Tests of significant descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Research Online,8 (2).23-74.Tabachnick, B. G ve Fidell, L.S. (2015). Çev Ed: Baloğlu, M. Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı. Ankara:
  2. Nobel Yayıncılık.Tong, Y. ve Shanggui, S. (2004). A Study on general self-efficacy and subjective well-being of low ses college students in a Chinese university. College Students Journal, 38 (4), 637-642.Weiser, D. ve Weigel, D., J. (2016). Self