Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Diurnal time-activity budget and foraging techniques of red-crested pochards (Netta rufina) wintering at the wetlands of West Bengal, India

Pages
424–439
Publication Date
2020-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The depth of the water played a significant role in the selection of the feeding techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed at recording the time-activity budget and feeding techniques of red-crested pochards (RCPs) to test the hypotheses that feeding techniques were influenced by the sexes and contrasting physical conditions of the habitat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the mean sex ratio of the RCPs was recorded as 0.655.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The depth of the water played a significant role in the selection of the feeding techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Red-crested pochard · diurnal behavior · foraging technique

Abstract

The present study aimed at recording the time-activity budget and feeding techniques of red-crested pochards (RCPs) to test the hypotheses that feeding techniques were influenced by the sexes and contrasting physical conditions of the habitat. The time-activity budget was quantified using the scanned sample approach. In this study, the mean sex ratio of the RCPs was recorded as 0.655. Dominant behavior was sleeping or resting (42.8% in February to 47.0% in January), followed by swimming (27.1% in February to 29.8% in December), feeding (10.9% in December to 16.6% in February), and preening (9.0% in January to 12.1% in February). During the diurnal hours, resting was highest in the morning, while swimming and feeding were both highest midday. Climatic factors, such as the maximum and minimum air temperatures, maximum and minimum air temperature differences, and day length, were considered to be influential on the diurnal time activities of the RCPs. Male birds were more frequent divers than the females and the duration of diving was greater in males than in females. However, in shallow water, beak dipping and upending were major foraging techniques in both sexes. The depth of the water played a significant role in the selection of the feeding techniques.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUKHERJEE, A., PAL, S., MUKHOPADHYAY, S. K. (2020). Diurnal time-activity budget and foraging techniques of red-crested pochards (Netta rufina) wintering at the wetlands of West Bengal, India. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 424–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/200196

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aissaoui Ryadh, 2011, Bulletin de l'Institut Scientifique Section Sciences de la Vie - Rabat, V33, P67 ALEXANDER WC, 1983, ECOL MODEL, V19, P285, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(83)90044-3 PAULUS S L, 1988, P135. Behney A. C., 2014, THESIS. MacCharles AM, 1997, THESIS. Muzara7 S B, 2004, FORKTAIL. Ali S., 1996, BOOK INDIAN BIRDS. AMAT JA, 1984,
  2. ARDEA, V72, P229. Frew RT, 2018,
  3. WILDFOWL, V68, P. Brides K, 2017,
  4. WILDFOWL, V67, P. Bibby CJ, 1992, BIRD CENSUS TECHNIQU. Delany S, 2006, WATERBIRD POPULATION. Liordos V, 2010, ZOOL STUD, V49, P311. Tamisier A, 1999, CAMARGUE CANARDS ETF. JOHNSGARD PA, 1965, HDB WATERFOWL BEHAV. Kear J., 2005, DUCKS GEESE SWANS SP, V2. Mazumdar S, 2007, INDIAN BIRDS, V3, P42. Chatterjee Asitava, 2013, Ring, V35, P31. MORRIER A, 1991, WILSON BULL, V103, P598. Tamisier Alain, 1995, Wildfowl, V46, P76. Carboneras C., 2019, HDB BIRDS WORLD ALIV. Madge S, 1988, WILDFOWL IDENTIFICAT, P298. Mikael K, 2014, TRENDS DRIVERS CHANG, P59. Martin P., 1993, MEASURING BEHAV INTR, P84. Ali E, 2016, RIVISTAITALIANA ORNI, V86, P19 Halkka A, 2011, BOREAL ENVIRON RES, V16, P35 Khan AA, 1998, PAKISTAN J ORNITHOLO, V2, P11 LOSITO MP, 1989, J FIELD ORNITHOL, V60, P388 Muzaffar Sabir Bin, 2004, Forktail, V20, P25 Boulkhssaim Mouloud, 2006, Wildfowl, V56, P65 Green AJ, 1998, REV ECOL-TERRE VIE, V53, P225 Delany S, 2002, WETLANDS INT GLOBAL, V12, P226 Draidi Khalil, 2019, Ornis Hungarica, V27, P85 Buckland ST, 1993, ZOOLOGICAL STUDIES, V48, P769 Kumar A, 2005,
  5. HDB INDIAN WETLAND B, Vi-xxvi, P1 Osterrieder Sylvia K., 2014, Wildfowl, V64, P126 BirdLife International, 2019, IUCN RED LIST BIRDS BirdLife International, 2019, SPEC FACTSH NETT RUF Blums P, 1996,
  6. AUK, V113, P505, DOI 10.2307/4088920 Johnson KP, 1999,
  7. AUK, V116, P792, DOI 10.2307/4089339 NILSSON L, 1970,
  8. OIKOS, V21, P145, DOI 10.2307/3543670 Wolf BO, 1996,
  9. ECOLOGY, V77, P2228, DOI 10.2307/2265716 Defos du Rau P., 2002, Game & Wildlife Science, V19, P89 HUTTO RL, 1986,
  10. AUK, V103, P593, DOI 10.1093/auk/103.3.593 Collins PM, 2016, J ZOOL, V300, P153, DOI 10.1111/jzo.12370 Das Jyotismita, 2011, Journal of Threatened Taxa, V3, P2263 O'Neal BJ, 2018, MOV ECOL, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40462-018-0141-5 Richman SE, 2004, ECOL APPL, V14, P1217, DOI 10.1890/03-5032 Amat JA, 2000, J ORNITHOL, V141, P327, DOI 10.1007/BF02462242 van Donk S, 2019, MOV ECOL, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40462-019-0159-3 Datta T, 2014, TURK J ZOOL, V38, P538, DOI 10.3906/zoo-1304-39 Ma ZJ, 2010,
  11. WETLANDS, V30, P15, DOI 10.1007/s13157-009-00