Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndromes using endovascular techniques

Pages
365–370
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall in-hospital mortality was 9.7%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE Acute thoracic aortic syndrome (ATAS) is a novel term to define emergency aortic conditions with common clinical features and challenges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS This cohort consisted of 31 consecutive patients (24 males; mean age, 57.5±13.81 years; range, 19-84 years) with acute thoracic aortic pathologies who underwent endovascular repair between January 2011 and January 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall in-hospital mortality was 9.7%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE Acute thoracic aortic syndrome (ATAS) is a novel term to define emergency aortic conditions with common clinical features and challenges. Traditional management of ATAS includes surgical replacement of the aorta and is correlated with high perioperative mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate our experience and outcomes in patients presenting with ATAS, managed by endovascular techniques. METHODS This cohort consisted of 31 consecutive patients (24 males; mean age, 57.5±13.81 years; range, 19-84 years) with acute thoracic aortic pathologies who underwent endovascular repair between January 2011 and January 2015. The study was designed as a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data. RESULTS Complicated acute type-B aortic dissection was the most common pathology (35.5%). All aortic stent-grafts (n=37) and dissection stents (n=9) were implanted with 100% procedural success. The overall in-hospital mortality was 9.7%. The mean follow-up duration of patients who were alive at 30 days was 25.9±11.49 months (3-53 months). So far, there have been no late deaths after 30 days. CONCLUSION In the high-risk setting of ATAS, endovascular procedures come forward as novel therapeutic strategies with promising results. Endovascular repair of ATAS can be considered as a first-line treatment alternative under emergency conditions with encouraging results, particularly when conventional surgical repair cannot be implemented due to prohibitive comorbidities.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUZ, E., CANYİĞİT, M., HIDIROĞLU, M., ŞENER, E. (2016). Treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndromes using endovascular techniques. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 365–370. https://ajindex.com/articles/199069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Vilacosta I, Román JA. Acute aortic syndrome. Heart 2001; 85:365-368. [CrossRef] Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and ab- dominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2873-2926. [CrossRef] Davies MG, Younes HK, Harris PW, et al. Out- comes before and after initiation of an acute aortic treatment center. J Vasc Surg 2011; 52:1478-1485. [CrossRef] Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation 2005; 112:3802-3813. [CrossRef] Barbato JE, Kim JY, Zenati M, et al. Contemporary results of open repair of ruptured descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneu- rysms. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45:667-676. [CrossRef] Moro H, Hayashi J, Sogawa M. Surgical man- agement of the ruptured aortic arch. Ann Tho- rac Surg 1999; 67:593-594.
  2. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC, Inoue T, Ohe Y. Di- agnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocar- diography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:1350-1356. [CrossRef] LePage MA, Quint LE, Sonnad SS, Deeb GM, Wil- liams DM. Aortic dissection: CT features that dis- tinguish true lumen from false lumen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:207-212. [CrossRef] Leurs LJ, Bell R, Degrieck Y, Thomas S, Hobo R, Lundbom J. Endovascular treatment of thorac- ic aortic diseases: combined experience from the Eurostar and United Kingdom Thoracic endograft registries. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:670- 679. [CrossRef] Tsai TT, Trimarchi S, Nienaber CA. Acute aortic dis- section: perspectives from the International Reg- istry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37:149-159. [CrossRef] Walsh SR, Tang TY, Sadat U, et al. Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aor- tic disease: systematic review and meta-anal- ysis of perioperative results. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:1094-1098. [CrossRef] Xenos ES, Minion DJ, Davenport DL, et al. En- dovascular versus open repair for descending thoracic aortic rupture: institutional experi- ence and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35:282-286. [CrossRef] Greenberg RK, Lu Q, Roselli EE, et al. Contem- porary analysis of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: a com- parison o