Journals / BELLETEN / 1991 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 213

The Ottoman Archives and Their Importance For Historical Studies: With Special Reference to Arab Provinces

Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
415–472
Publication Date
1991-08-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The report prepared by Unesco in 1982 makes this point very clear.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Although the term Ottoman Archives should in fact include any archive that once fell within the boundaries of the Ottoman Empire, it only reminds us of the Başbakanlık (Primeministerial) Archives and that of Topkapı Palace in Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore the Ottoman archival material whether found in the National Archive of Cairo or in Ragusa Archive of Yoguslavia are of no lesser importance than those found in Başbakanlık Archive although not as abundant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The report prepared by Unesco in 1982 makes this point very clear.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Ottoman Empire · Ottoman Archives · Başbakanlık (Primeministerial) Archives

Özet

Öz Although the term Ottoman Archives should in fact include any archive that once fell within the boundaries of the Ottoman Empire, it only reminds us of the Başbakanlık (Primeministerial) Archives and that of Topkapı Palace in Istanbul. Furthermore the Ottoman archival material whether found in the National Archive of Cairo or in Ragusa Archive of Yoguslavia are of no lesser importance than those found in Başbakanlık Archive although not as abundant. The scholars of the Balkan states such as Albania, Bosnia, Bulgaria and Hungary have not only taken interest in the Ottoman archives in their own countries, but also in the Primeministerial Archive of Istanbul, and have studied and published many documents -especially the ones pertaining to their own countries- from these archives. Unfortunately the Turks and the Arabs have only recently started taking interest in these archives and particularly the Arab scholars in this field are very scant. There is no doubt that these archives are not only important for the Muslim countries but also for the world history. The report prepared by Unesco in 1982 makes this point very clear.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLHAN, M. M. (1991). The Ottoman Archives and Their Importance For Historical Studies: With Special Reference to Arab Provinces. BELLETEN, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 213, 415–472. https://ajindex.com/articles/198740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. NİLÜFER ABDULHAKİM, XVI. yüzyılda Musul Eyaleti, Ph.D. thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi,Edebiyat Fakültesi, Osmanlı Müesseleri Tarihi Kürsüsü, 1974. ABDURRAHMAN ŞEREF, "Evrak-ı atika ve vesaik-i tarihiyemiz", TOEM I (April 1326), pp. 9-19, (in Latin letters: İsmet Binark, in Türk Kütüphanecileri Derneği Bülteni, XXIX, 1, pp. 23-38). ABDURRAHMAN ŞEREF, "Berlin Hazine-i Evrakında vesaik-i kadime-i Osmaniye", TOEM, 44. cüz (1333), pp. 65-92.
  2. NECATİ AKTAŞ-ISMET BİNARK, El-Arşiv el-Osmani: Fihris şamil li-vesa'ik el-devle el-Osmaniye el-mahfuze bi-dar el-vesa'ik el-tabı'a li-riase el-vüzera bi-Istanbul (Ottoman Archives: Başbakanlık Arşivi-Istanbul), Tercüme: Salih Sadawi Salih, Amman 1986. (As far as I know, Turkish version was not published) NECATİ AKTAŞ, "Başbakanlık Osmanlı arşvilerinin bugünkü durumu", Osmanlı Arşivleri., May 1985, İstanbul, pp. 73-84. MEHMET ALDAN, "Türkiye arşiv sorunu", Amme İdaresi Dergisi, IX/3 (September 1976), pp. 35-65. NECİP ALPAN, "Türk arşiv kaynakları ve Balkan milletleri", Önasya V, 46 (Haziran 1969). ÜLKÜ ALTINDAĞ, "Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Arşivi", Osmanlı Arşivleri., May 1985, İstanbul, pp. 117-120. NİGAR ANAFARTA, "Topkapı Sarayı Arşiv Dairesi", Hayat Tarih Mecmuası II, 11 (1965), pp. 60-64. İBRAHIM ATEŞ, "Vakıf Belgeler Arşivi'nin Dünü ve Bugünü", 2 nci Vakıf Haftası, (3-9 December 1984), Ankara 1985. GABRİEL BAER, "Fellah and townsman in Ottoman Egypt", Asian and African Studies, VIII, 3 (1972), pp. 221-265.
  3. MUHAMMAD ADNAN BAKHIT, The Ottoman Province of Damascus in the Sixteenth Century, Beirut 1982. ÖMER LÜTFİ BARKAN, "Osmanlı Devrinde Akkoyunlu hükümdarı Uzun Hasan Bey'e ait kanunlar", Tarih Vesikaları Dergisi, I and II, İstanbul 1941-42,pp.91-106, 184-197. Ö. L. BARKAN, "Daftar-i Khakani", E12. "Başbakanlık Arşivi", Hayat Tarih Mecmuası, I, 5 (1965), pp. 70-75. "Başbakanlık Arşivi 'Tarihi belgeler' serisi", Belgelerle Türk Tarih Dergisi, 43 (1971), pp.54-55. G. BAYERLE, "Lajos Fekete 1891-1969",
  4. Chronica in Archivum Ottomanicum, I (1969), pp. 303-316. G. BAYERLE, "Toward a classification of Ottoman Tapu registers", Acta Or., 32 (1970), pp. 15-19. CAVİT BAYSUN, "Mustafa Reşit Paşa", Tanzimat I, İstanbul 1940. ALİ HİMMET BERKİ, "Eski vesikalar, ilam hüccetler, ferman, beratlar ve kayd-ı Hakani", Adalet Dergisi, LIII, 5-6 (1962), pp. 439-458. N. H. BİEGMAN, "Some peculiarities of firmans issued by the Ottoman treasury in the sixteenth century", Archivum Ottomanicum, 1 (1969), pp. 9-13. MUSTAFA BİLGE, "Türk tarihi çalışmal