Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Gün Boyu Ağrılı Standart Nefrostomiye Karşı Ağrısız Tüpsüz-Suprakostal PNL

Supracostal PCNL-Standard Nephrostomy with Day Long Pain Versus Painless Tubeless

Pages
73–77
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Tüpsüz suprakostal PNL daha az hastanede kalış süresine sahiptir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Tüpsüz suprakostal perkütan nefrolitotominin (PNL), randomize kontrollü çalışma ile güvenlik açısından kapsamını belirlemek.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gereç ve Yöntem: Suprakostal PNL uygulanan erişkin hastalar (>14 yıl), tüplü suprakostal PNL için A grubu olarak ve tüpsüz suprakostal PNL için B grubu olarak iki gruba tek sayı randomize edildi (her biri 25 hasta).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tüpsüz suprakostal PNL daha az hastanede kalış süresine sahiptir.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:25 hasta
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Tüpsüz suprakostal perkütan nefrolitotominin (PNL), randomize kontrollü çalışma ile güvenlik açısından kapsamını belirlemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Suprakostal PNL uygulanan erişkin hastalar (>14 yıl), tüplü suprakostal PNL için A grubu olarak ve tüpsüz suprakostal PNL için B grubu olarak iki gruba tek sayı randomize edildi (her biri 25 hasta). İki grup ameliyat günü enjektabl analjezi ve operasyon sonrası ilk günden itibaren oral analjezi aldı. Ağrı şiddeti görsel analog ölçeği (GAÖ) ile objektif olarak değerlendirildi. Plevral efüzyon ve perinefrik koleksiyonu saptamak için göğüs X-ray ve böbrek ultrasonu yapıldı. Torakostomi ve endotrakeal entübasyon ile birlikte bu komplikasyonlar gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Grup A ve B ortalama GAÖ skoru sırasıyla 7,88±0,83 ve 4,12±0,83 idi (p=0,01). Grup A’da 25 hastanın 4’ünde (%16) ve grup B’de 25 hastanın 1’inde (%4) plevral efüzyon gelişti. Grup A’da 2 (%8) hasta ve grup B’de 1 (%4) hasta torakostomi yerleştirilmesini gerektirdi (p=0,56). Her bir grupta 1 hastada (%2) elektif entübasyon ve ventilasyona ihtiyaç duyan respiratuvar distres gelişti (p=1,00). B grubu (4,12±0,52 gün) için ortalama hastanede kalış süresi A grubundan (4,68±0,85 gün) daha kısa idi. Sonuç: Tüpsüz suprakostal PNL, komplikasyon oranlarında fark olmaksızın tüplü suprakostal PNL’den daha az ağrılıdır. Tüpsüz suprakostal PNL daha az hastanede kalış süresine sahiptir.

Özet

Objective: To determine the scope of tubeless (TL) supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in terms of safety through a randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: Adult patients (>14 years) undergoing supracostal PCNL were randomized into two groups (25 patients each), by randomizing odd number for supracostal PCNL with tube (WT) as group A and for TL supracostal PCNL as group B. Both groups received injectable analgesia on operative day and oral analgesia from the first post-operative day. Pain severity was objectively assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Chest X-ray and kidney ultrasonography were done to detect any pleural effusion and perinephric collection. These complications along with thoracostomy and endotracheal intubation were compared between the groups. Results: The mean (VAS) score in group A and B was 7.88±0.83 and 4.12±0.83, respectively (p=0.01). Four of 25 (16%) patients in group A and 1 of 25 (4%) patients in group B developed pleural effusion. Two patients (8%) in group A and 1 patient (4%) in group B required tube thoracostomy (p=0.56). One patient (4%) in group A and 2 patients (8%) in group B developed perinephric collection (p=0.56). A single patient in each group (2%) developed respiratory distress needing elective intubation and ventilation (p=1.00). The mean hospital stay in group B (4.12±0.52 days) was shorter than in group A (4.68±0.85 days) (p=0.01). Conclusion: Tubeless supracostal PCNL is less painful than supracostal PCNL WT, without difference in complication rates. Supracostal PCNL (TL) has a shorter hospital stay.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİDDİQ, A., KHALİD, S. E., SAULAT, S., KHAN, S. A., MİTHANİ, M. H. (2018). Gün Boyu Ağrılı Standart Nefrostomiye Karşı Ağrısız Tüpsüz-Suprakostal PNL. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 73–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/198566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr; AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel). Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000.
  2. Shahrour K, Tomaszewski J, Ortiz T, Scott E, Sternberg KM, Jackman SV, Averch TD. Predictors of Immediate Postoperative Outcome of Single-tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology 2012;80:19-26.
  3. Ritter M, Krombach P, Michel MS. Percutaneous stone removal. European Urology Supplements 2011;10:433-439.
  4. Shah HN, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2006;20:1016-1021.
  5. Maheshwari PN, Andankar M, Hedge S, Bansal M. Supra-costal approach for PCNL. BJU Int 2000;85:557. Al-Ba’adani TH, Al-Kohlany KM, Al-Adimi A, Al-Towaity M, Al-Baadani T, Alwan M, Al-Hussieni M, Al-Germozi S, Al-Masani M, Al-Badwy K, El-Nono IH. Tubeless percutaneous neprolithotomy: the new gold standard. Int Urol Nephrol 2008;40:603-608.
  6. Shah H, Khandkar A, Sodha H, Kharodawala S, Hegde S, Bansal M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients. BJU Int 2009;104:840-846.
  7. Jun-Ou J, Lojanapiwat B. Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety? Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:171-176.
  8. Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Huri E, Erşekerci E, Karacagil M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol 2007;21:967-972.
  9. Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A. Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 2002;90:809-813.
  10. Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 2006;20:491-494.
  11. Sekar H, Krishnamoorthy S, Kumaresan N, Ramanan V. Supracostal Punctures for PCNL: Factors that Predict Safety, Success and Stone Free Rate in Stag Horn and Non-Stag Horn Stones: A Single Centre Experience and Review of Literature. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:PC17-PC21. Kara C, Değirmenci T, Kozacioglu Z, Gunlusoy B, Koras O, Minareci S. Supracostal Approach for PCNL: Is 10th and 11th Intercostal Space Safe According to Clavien Classification System? Int Surg 2014;99:857-862.
  12. Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H. Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients requiring supracostal access. Urol Int 2009;82:440-443. Kara C,