Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Coronary lesion complexity assessed by SYNTAX score in 256-slice dual-source MDCT angiography

Pages
334–340
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION The calculation of SS-MDCT by adapting SS-ICA parameters achieved nearly the same degree of precision as SS-ICA and was better than SS-ICA, especially in the low SS group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE The SYNTAX Score (SS) has an important role in grading the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing revascularization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Our study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent both MDCT angiography with a 256-slice dual-source MDCT system and ICA within 14±3 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION The calculation of SS-MDCT by adapting SS-ICA parameters achieved nearly the same degree of precision as SS-ICA and was better than SS-ICA, especially in the low SS group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE The SYNTAX Score (SS) has an important role in grading the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing revascularization. Noninvasive determination of SS prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) might optimize patient management. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ICA and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) while testing the diagnostic effectiveness of SS-MDCT. METHODS Our study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent both MDCT angiography with a 256-slice dual-source MDCT system and ICA within 14±3 days. SS was calculated for both ICA and MDCT coronary angiography. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association of SS-MDCT with SS-ICA, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed. RESULTS The degree of agreement between SS-ICA and SS-MDCT was moderate. The mean SS-MDCT was 14.5, whereas the mean SS-ICA was 15.9. After dividing SS into three groups (high [>=33], intermediate [23-32], and low [<=22] subgroups), agreement analysis was repeated. There was a significant correlation between SS-MDCT and SS-ICA in the low SS group (r=0.63, P = 0.043) but no significant correlation in the high SS group (r=0.036, P = 0.677). The inter-test agreement analysis showed at least moderate agreement, whereas thrombotic lesions and the type of bifurcation lesion showed fair agreement. CONCLUSION The calculation of SS-MDCT by adapting SS-ICA parameters achieved nearly the same degree of precision as SS-ICA and was better than SS-ICA, especially in the low SS group.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCELER, Z., KANTARCI, M., TANBOĞA, İ. H., SADE, R., KIZRAK, Y., PİRİMOĞLU, R. B., BAYRAKTUTAN, Ü., OĞUL, H., AKSAKAL, E. (2016). Coronary lesion complexity assessed by SYNTAX score in 256-slice dual-source MDCT angiography. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 334–340. https://ajindex.com/articles/198247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The syntax score: An angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroInt- ervention 2005; 1:219-227.
  2. Wvkrzkowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized mul- ticenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Dura- ble versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:272-277. [CrossRef] Girasis C, Garg S, Räber L, et al. SYNTAX score and Clinical SYNTAX score as predictors of very long-term clinical outcomes in patients under- going percutaneous coronary interventions: a substudy of SIRolimus-eluting stent compared with pacliTAXel-eluting stent for coronary re- vascularization (SIRTAX) trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 3115-3127. [CrossRef] Garg S, Girasis C, Sarno G, et al. The syntax score revisited: a reassessment of the syntax score re- producibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75:946-952. [CrossRef] Tanboga IH, Ekinci M, Isik T, Kurt M, Kaya A, Se- vimli S. Reproducibility of syntax score: from core lab to real world. J Interv Cardiol 2011; 24: 302-306. [CrossRef] Stahli BE, Bonassin F, Goetti R, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography indicates complexity of percutaneous coronary inter- ventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2012; 24:196-201.
  3. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:961-972. [CrossRef] Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, et al. Complexity of ath- erosclerotic coronary artery disease and long- term outcomes in patients with unprotected left main disease treated with drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardi- ol 2011; 57:2152-2159. [CrossRef] Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the syntax trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32:2125-2134. [CrossRef] Shiomi H, Tamura T, Niki S, et al. Inter- and in- tra-observer variability for assessment of the synergy between percutaneous coronary in- tervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (syn- tax) score and association of the syntax score with clinical outcome in patients undergoing unprotected left main stenting in the real world. Circ J 2011; 75:1130-1137. [CrossRef] Westwood ME, Raatz HD, Misso K, et al. Sys- tematic review of the accuracy of dual-source c