Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2003 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Global Kapitalizmde Sermaye Birikimi İçin Yeni Mekansal Ölçekler: Dünya Kentleri/Global Kentler

Pages
41–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then, the inquiry is developed as follows: starting from the 1980s, neo-liberal policies, as an alternative to the Fordist-Keynesian system, has changed the strategies of capital accumulation; in order to adjust new strategies, nation-states have started to develop new territorial scales both at supra-national and sub-national levels; and "global cities" or "world cities" are one of the new territorial scales of newly emerging sub-national level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, firstly, the notions of World Cities or Global Cities are presented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Secondly, the arguments that are raised within these debates, such as new international division of labor, world city formation, world city hierarchy, and urban territorial competition, are discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then, the inquiry is developed as follows: starting from the 1980s, neo-liberal policies, as an alternative to the Fordist-Keynesian system, has changed the strategies of capital accumulation; in order to adjust new strategies, nation-states have started to develop new territorial scales both at supra-national and sub-national levels; and "global cities" or "world cities" are one of the new territorial scales of newly emerging sub-national level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, firstly, the notions of World Cities or Global Cities are presented. Secondly, the arguments that are raised within these debates, such as new international division of labor, world city formation, world city hierarchy, and urban territorial competition, are discussed. Then, the inquiry is developed as follows: starting from the 1980s, neo-liberal policies, as an alternative to the Fordist-Keynesian system, has changed the strategies of capital accumulation; in order to adjust new strategies, nation-states have started to develop new territorial scales both at supra-national and sub-national levels; and "global cities" or "world cities" are one of the new territorial scales of newly emerging sub-national level.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, önce 1980'li yıllarla birlikte kentsel araştırmaların gündemine oturan "dünya kenti" ya da "global kent" tartışmaları üzerinde durulmakta ve bu tartışmalarda ileri sürülen, emeğin yeni uluslararası bölüşümü, global kentlerin doğuşu, global kentsel hiyerarşi ve kentler arası mekansal rekabet gibi argümanlar ele alınmaktadır. Daha sonra ise, 1980'lerle birlikte, Fordist-Keynezyen sistemin krizine çözüm olarak ortaya çıkan neo-liberal politikaların sermaye birikim stratejilerini değiştirdiği, bu bağlamda ulus-devletin bu değişime uyum sağlayabilmek için ulus-üstü ve ulus-altı yeni mekansal ölçekler oluşturarak yeniden yapılandığı, global kentlerin ya da dünya kentlerinin de yeni oluşturulan ulus-altı mekansal ölçeklerden biri olduğu görüşü üzerinde durulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, A. K. (2003). Global Kapitalizmde Sermaye Birikimi İçin Yeni Mekansal Ölçekler: Dünya Kentleri/Global Kentler. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 41–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/198119

References (16)

  1. Armstrong, David (1998), "Globalization and the Social State", Review of International Studies, 24, s. 461-478.
  2. Breatnach, Proinnsias (2000), "Globalisation, Information Technology and the Emergence of Niche Transnational Cities: the Growth of the Call Centre Sector in Dublin", Geoforum,3l, s. 477-485.
  3. Beaverstock, Jonathan, V. (2002), "Transnational Elites in Global Cities: British Expatriates in Singapore's Financial District", Geoforum, 3, s. 525-538.
  4. Beaverstock, Jonathan. V. - Boardwell, James, T. (2000), "Negotiating Globalizotion, Transnation Corporations and Global City Financial Center in Transient Migration Studies", Applied Geography, 20, s. 277-304.
  5. Beaverstock, Jonathan, V. - Taylor, P. J. - Smith, R. G. (1999), "A Roster of World Cities", Cities, 16 (6), s. 445-458.
  6. Brenner, Neil (1998), "Global Cities, Glocal Ztates: Global City Formation and State territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe", Review of International Political Economy, 5 (1), s. 1-37.
  7. Brenner, Neil (1999), "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union", Urban Studies, 36 (3), s. 431 -451. Brenner, Neil (2000), "The Urban Question as a Scale Question:Reflection on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (2), s. 361-375.
  8. Brenner, Neil (2001), "World City Theory, Globalization and The Comperative-Historical Method", Urban Affairs Review, September, s.124-147.
  9. Budd, Leslie (1998), "Territorial Competition and Globalisation: Scylla and Charybolis of European Cities", Urban Studies, 35 (4), s. 663-685.
  10. Doğan, Ali, E. (2002),
  11. Birikimin Hamalları-Kriz, Neo-Liberalizm ve Kent, Donkişot Akademi Yayınları, 1. Basım, İstanbul.
  12. Douglass, Mike (2000), "Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Globalisation, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Pacific Asia", Urban Studies, 37 (12), s. 2315-2335.
  13. Farazmand, Ali (2001), "Globalization, The State and Public Administration: A Theoretical Analysis with Policy Implications for Developmental States", Public Organization Review: A Global Journal (Kluwer Academic Publisher S.Netherlands), 1.s.437-463.
  14. Friedmann, John (1986), "The World City Hypothesis", Development and Change, 17, s. 69-83.
  15. Firman, Tommy (1998), The Restructuring of Jakarta Metropolitan Area: A "Global City" in Asia, Cities, 15 (4), s. 229-243.
  16. Firman, Tommy (1999), "From 'Global City' to 'City of Crisis': Jakarta Metropalitan Region Under