Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Epibrassinolide activates AKT to trigger autophagy with polyamine metabolism in SW480 and DLD-1 colon cancer cell lines

Pages
417–426
Publication Date
2020-12-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggested that EBR-mediated Akt activation might determine the downstream cellular stress responses to induce autophagy related to polyamines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Epibrassinolide (EBR), a plant-derived polyhydroxylated derivative of 5 alpha-cholestane, structurally shows similarities to animal steroid hormones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the present study, EBR treatment triggered a significant stress response via activating ER stress, autophagy, and apoptosis in cancer cells.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggested that EBR-mediated Akt activation might determine the downstream cellular stress responses to induce autophagy related to polyamines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Autophagy · epibrassinolide · polyamines

Abstract

Epibrassinolide (EBR), a plant-derived polyhydroxylated derivative of 5 alpha-cholestane, structurally shows similarities to animal steroid hormones. According to the present study, EBR treatment triggered a significant stress response via activating ER stress, autophagy, and apoptosis in cancer cells. EBR could also increase Akt phosphorylation in vitro. While the activation of Akt resulted in cellular metabolic activation in normal cells to proceed with cell survival, a rapid stress response was induced in cancer cells to reduce survival. Therefore, Akt as a mediator of cellular survival and death decision pathways is a crucial target in cancer cells. In this study, we determined that EBR induces stress responses through activating Akt, which reduced the mTOR complex I (mTORC1) activation in SW480 and DLD-1 colon cancer cells. As a consequence, EBR triggered macroautophagy and led to lipidation of LC3 most efficiently in SW480 cells. The cotreatment of spermidine (Spd) with EBR increased lipidation of LC3 synergistically in both cell lines. We also found that EBR promoted polyamine catabolism in SW480 cells. The retention of polyamine biosynthesis was remarkable following EBR treatment. We suggested that EBR-mediated Akt activation might determine the downstream cellular stress responses to induce autophagy related to polyamines.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADACAN, K., YERLİKAYA, P. O. (2020). Epibrassinolide activates AKT to trigger autophagy with polyamine metabolism in SW480 and DLD-1 colon cancer cell lines. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 417–426. https://ajindex.com/articles/197903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akkoc Y, 2018, TURK J GASTROENTEROL, V29, P270, DOI 10.5152/tjg.2018.150318 Banerjee IA, 2019, MAT SCI ENG C-MATER, V97, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.037 Coskun D, 2015, EXP CELL RES, V338, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.08.015 Cybulsky AV, 2017, NAT REV NEPHROL, V13, P681, DOI 10.1038/nrneph.2017.129 DeBerardinis RJ, 2008, CELL METAB, V7, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002 Eisenberg T, 2009, NAT CELL BIOL, V11, P1305, DOI 10.1038/ncb1975 Esposito D, 2011, J MED CHEM, V54, P4057, DOI 10.1021/jm200028h Franke TF, 2008,
  2. ONCOGENE, V27, P6473, DOI 10.1038/onc.2008.313 Gozuacik D, 2004,
  3. ONCOGENE, V23, P2891, DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1207521 Gozuacik D, 2007, CURR TOP DEV BIOL, V78, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)78006-1 Hai Y, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms15368 Jung CH, 2010, FEBS LETT, V584, P1287, DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017 Kahana C, 2009, CELL MOL LIFE SCI, V66, P2479, DOI 10.1007/s00018-009-0033-3 Kocaturk NM, 2019, EUR J PHARM SCI, V134, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.04.011 Kuryayeva F, 2019, EPIBRASSINOLIDE PROM, V40, P10 Lee ST, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057708 Liu HY, 2009, J BIOL CHEM, V284, P31484, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109.033936 Menon D, 2017, J BIOL CHEM, V292, P6303, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M116.772988 Obakan P, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0135788 Obakan P, 2014, AMINO ACIDS, V46, P553, DOI 10.1007/s00726-013-1574-1 Obakan-Yerlikaya P, 2017, MOL CARCINOGEN, V56, P1603, DOI 10.1002/mc.22616 Palavan-Unsal N., 2006, Experimental Oncology, V28, P178 Palmieri M, 2017, CELL CYCLE, V16, P1237, DOI 10.1080/15384101.2017.1337968 Persad S, 2001, J BIOL CHEM, V276, P27462, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102940200 Pietrocola F, 2015, CELL DEATH DIFFER, V22, P509, DOI 10.1038/cdd.2014.215 Rueden CT, 2017, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z SINGH S, 1990, ANAL BIOCHEM, V187, P212, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90446-G Song S, J CELLULAR PHYSL, V233, P3867. Wang Tian, 2005, Zhiwu Shengli yu Fenzi Shengwuxue Xuebao, V31, P637 Yue F, 2017, CANCER RES, V77, P2938, DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3462 Zhang Z, 2012, MOL CELL BIOCHEM, V361, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11010-011-1110-0