Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Signature changes in the expressions of protein-coding genes, lncRNAs, and repeat elements in early and late cellular senescence

Pages
356–370
Publication Date
2020-12-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results indicate that, in addition to previously reported L1 elements, various LTR and DNA transposons, as well as members of the classical satellites including HSAT5 and alpha-satellites (ALR/Alpha), are expressed at higher levels in late senescence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Replicative cellular senescence is the main cause of aging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By utilising RNA sequencing data of fibroblasts, hereby, we are not only reporting changes in gene expression profiles and relevant biological processes in the early and late senescent phenotypes but also presenting significant differences in the expressions of many unravelled long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and transcripts arisen from repetitive DNA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results indicate that, in addition to previously reported L1 elements, various LTR and DNA transposons, as well as members of the classical satellites including HSAT5 and alpha-satellites (ALR/Alpha), are expressed at higher levels in late senescence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Senescence · senescence-associated-secretory phenotype · lncRNA

Abstract

Replicative cellular senescence is the main cause of aging. It is important to note that early senescence is linked to tissue regeneration, whereas late senescence is known to trigger a chronically inflammatory phenotype. Despite the presence of various genome-wide studies, there is a lack of information on distinguishing early and late senescent phenotypes at the transcriptome level. Particularly, the changes in the noncoding RNA portion of the aging cell have not been fully elucidated. By utilising RNA sequencing data of fibroblasts, hereby, we are not only reporting changes in gene expression profiles and relevant biological processes in the early and late senescent phenotypes but also presenting significant differences in the expressions of many unravelled long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and transcripts arisen from repetitive DNA. Our results indicate that, in addition to previously reported L1 elements, various LTR and DNA transposons, as well as members of the classical satellites including HSAT5 and alpha-satellites (ALR/Alpha), are expressed at higher levels in late senescence. Moreover, we revealed finer links between the expression levels of repeats with the genes located near them and known to be involved in cell cycle and senescence. Noncoding elements reported here provide a new perspective to be explored in further experimental studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKULAH, G., YANDİM, C. (2020). Signature changes in the expressions of protein-coding genes, lncRNAs, and repeat elements in early and late cellular senescence. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 356–370. https://ajindex.com/articles/197898

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdelmohsen K, 2013, AGING CELL, V12, P890, DOI 10.1111/acel.12115 Alexander E, 2013, J CELL SCI, V126, P3738, DOI 10.1242/jcs.128835 Alfonso A, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-46988-x Anwar SL, 2017, INT J MOL SCI, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijms18050974 Attig J, 2019, GENOME RES, V29, P1578, DOI 10.1101/gr.248922.119 Austin AS, 2003, J IMMUNOL, V171, P1336, DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1336 Burns KH, 2017, NAT REV CANCER, V17, P415, DOI 10.1038/nrc.2017.35 Casella G, 2019, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V47, P7294, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkz555 Cecco M, 2013, AGING CELL, V12, P247, DOI 10.1111/acel.12047 Chen Q, 2019, J MOL CELL BIOL, V11, P496, DOI 10.1093/jmcb/mjy056 Coppe JP, 2010, ANNU REV PATHOL-MECH, V5, P99, DOI 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 Coppe JP, 2008, PLOS BIOL, V6, P2853, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301 Criscione SW, 2016, TRENDS GENET, V32, P751, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2016.09.005 Crossland H, 2017, FASEB J, V31, P96, DOI 10.1096/fj.201600296RRR De Cecco M, 2019,
  2. NATURE, V566, P73, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0784-9 De Cecco M, 2013, AGING-US, V5, P867, DOI 10.18632/aging.100621 de Koning APJ, 2011, PLOS GENET, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002384 Demaria M, 2014, DEV CELL, V31, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012 di Fagagna FD, 2008, NAT REV CANCER, V8, P512, DOI 10.1038/nrc2440 Elbarbary RA, 2016,
  3. SCIENCE, V351, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7247 Feng SY, 2018, J MOL BIOL, V430, P3068, DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.07.002 Gustafsson K, 2013, EXP CELL RES, V319, P1852, DOI 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.020 Herranz N, 2018, J CLIN INVEST, V128, P1238, DOI 10.1172/JCI95148 Hu WL, 2018, NAT CELL BIOL, V20, P492, DOI 10.1038/s41556-018-0066-7 Huang DW, 2009, NAT PROTOC, V4, P44, DOI 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 Hubley R, 2016, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V44, pD81, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv1272 Huda A, 2009,
  4. GENE, V436, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2009.01.013 Humbert N, 2010, EMBO J, V29, P376, DOI 10.1038/emboj.2009.342 Jurka J, 2007, ANNU REV GENOM HUM G, V8, P241, DOI 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.080706.092416 Kaldis P, 2012,
  5. DEVELOPMENT, V139, P225, DOI 10.1242/dev.073288 Karakulah G, 2019,
  6. PEERJ, V7, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8192 Kishikawa T, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13006 Lander ES, 2001,
  7. NATURE, V409, P860, DOI 10.1038/35057062 Lei L, 2017, MOL MED REP, V15, P3977, DOI 10.3892/mmr.2017.6532 Leinonen R, 2011, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V39, pD19, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq1019 Li H, 2009,
  8. BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 Liao Y, 2019, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V47, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkz114