Journals / Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Determination of effecting different form humic acid on yield, quality and dry matter of strawberry plant

Farklı formlarda uygulanan humik asitin çilek bitkisinde ürün, kalite ve bitki kurumaddesi üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi

Pages
23–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also understood that the applications of humic acid had no effect, due to probably, high $CaCO_3$ content of soil used and growing cultivar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of the humic acid applications with in two years in solid and liquid form on the yield and yield quality of strawberry plant was designed according to the randomized blocks as four parallels were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Agrolig a solid form of humic acid and has 85 % humic acid, were applied to plots in the amount of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg/da before the planting and mixed into soil.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also understood that the applications of humic acid had no effect, due to probably, high $CaCO_3$ content of soil used and growing cultivar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ürün verimi · toprak yapısı · humik asit

Abstract

The effects of the humic acid applications with in two years in solid and liquid form on the yield and yield quality of strawberry plant was designed according to the randomized blocks as four parallels were investigated. Agrolig a solid form of humic acid and has 85 % humic acid, were applied to plots in the amount of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg/da before the planting and mixed into soil. Blackjak a liquid form of humic acid was applied by drip irrigation system at the concentration of 250, 500, 750 and 1000 tnl/da/month. In addition to humic acids applications, during the vegetation period, N, $P_2O_5$, $K_2O$ of chemical fertilizer were also given to all experiment area by drip irrigation system in the amount of 20 kg/da, 10 kg/da and 40 kg/da respectively. It was seen that, no significant effects of solid and liquid humic acid application on the fruit yield, yield quality, fruit quality about bigness and, dry matter of plant. It is also understood that the applications of humic acid had no effect, due to probably, high $CaCO_3$ content of soil used and growing cultivar.

Özet

Antalya yöresinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaya başlayan katı ve sıvı formdaki humik asitlerin çilekte verim ve ürün kalitesi üzerine etkileri, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre kurulan sera denemesinde iki yıl üst üste humik asidin uygulandığı durumda belirlenmiştir. Denemede % 85 humik asit içeren katı formdaki humik asidin (Agrolig) kontrol, 10, 20, 30, 40 kg/da uygulamaları dikimden önce; % 15 humik asit içeren (Blackjak) sıvı formdaki humik asidin 250, 500, 750, 1000 ml/da/ay düzeyleri damla sulama ile uygulanmıştır. Denemede humik asidin yanında 20 kg/da N, 10 kg/da $P_2O_5$ ve 40 kg/da $K_2O$ düzeyindeki kimyasal gübre damla sulama ile uygulanmıştır. Deneme sonucunda uygulanılan farklı formlardaki (katı ve sıvı) humik asidin çilek verimi ile irilik bakımından meyve kalitesi ve ortalama meyve ağırlığı ve bitkileri kurumadde kapsamları üzerine önemli etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Deneme koşullarında humik asidin önemli düzeyde etkili olmamasına yetiştirme ortamının kireç kapsamının yüksek ve yetiştirilen çilek çeşidinden kaynaklandığı düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİLANALI, N., KAPLAN, M. (2000). Determination of effecting different form humic acid on yield, quality and dry matter of strawberry plant. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 23–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/197881

References (8)

  1. Akalan, I., 1983. Toprak Bilgisi. Ankara Üni.Zir.Fak.Ya.:878, Ders Kitabi: 243, Ankara.
  2. Ali-Zade, M. A., Gadzhieva, S.I., 1977. Stimulation of Plant Growth and Nucleic Acid Exchange by Humic Acid. Doklady Academii Navk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR, No.9, 34-36. Anonim, 1978.
  3. Çilek. TSE, Türk Standardlan Ens., 4 ss. Anonymous, 1992. İFA. World Fertilizer Use Manual. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Germany. Bernardoni, C, Cerioni, G., Fabbri, A., Paoletti, M., 1990. Fertigation Experiments in Horticulture. Coltre Protette, 19, 12. Black, C.A., 1957. Soil-Plant Relationships. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. Black, C.A., 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher,
  4. Madisson, Wisconsin; U.S.A., 1372-1376.
  5. Bouyoucos, G.J., 1955. A Recalibration of the Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of the Soils. Agronomy Journal, 4(9):434. Çağlar, K.Ö., 1949. Toprak Bilgisi. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, Sayı: 10. David, P.P.,1991. F;ffects of Applied Humic Acids on Yield, Growth, Nutrient Accumulation/Content in Selected Vegetable Crops and Soil Interactions That Reduce Their Effect i wen ess. Dissertation Abstracts Int.B.Sciences and Eng., 52(3): M36B-1137B. Dormaar, J.F., 1975. Effects of Humic Substances from Ccrno/.emic Ah Horizons on Nutrient Uptake by Phaseolus vulguris and Festuca scabrella. Can. J. Soil Sci., 55: 111-118.
  6. Fortun, C, Lopez-Fando, C, 1982. Influence of Humic Acid on The Mineral Nutrition and The Development of Maize Roots Cultivated in Normal Nutrient Solutions and Lacking Fe and Mn. Anales de Edafologiay Agrogiologia XLL335-349. Freed, R., Emensmıth, S.P., Guetz, S., Reicosky, D., Smaıl, V.W., Wolberg, P., 1989.
  7. User's Guide to Mstat-C, Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments. Michigan State University, USA. Grabıkowski, E., Plenıawski, J., Puzyna, W., Slanınski, J., 1977. The Influence of Photooxidation Pruducts of Humic Acids on Germination and Growth of Wheat Seeds.Zeszyty Naukowe AkademiiRolniczej w Szczecinie, Rolnictwo,No.84: 117-128.
  8. Güngör, H., 1992. Bazı Tarım Ürünlerinde Kalite Özellikleri. T.C., Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müd., Eskişehir Araştırma Ens. Yayınlan, Genel Yayın No: 230, teknik Yayın No: 24, Eskişehir. Jackson, M.L., 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. Kaçar, B., 1962. Plant and Soil Analysis. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy, Nebraska, U.S.A. Kaçar, B