Journals / Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Four New Records for the Freshwater Algae of Turkey

Türkiye Tatlısu Algleri için Dört Yeni Kayıt

Pages
83–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They belong to the following phyla: 1 (Oscillatoria nitida) to Cyanoprokaryota, wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta. (Micractinium bornhemiense and Lagerheimia wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the fact that planktonic algae are a critical component of freshwater ecosystems, our understanding of their diversity and species distributions is still rather poor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 84 phytoplankton samples were collected from 7 sites in the Tigris River from February 2008 to January 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They belong to the following phyla: 1 (Oscillatoria nitida) to Cyanoprokaryota, wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta. (Micractinium bornhemiense and Lagerheimia wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Despite the fact that planktonic algae are a critical component of freshwater ecosystems, our understanding of their diversity and species distributions is still rather poor. This study contributes new information to the knowledge of Turkish freshwater microflora. A total of 84 phytoplankton samples were collected from 7 sites in the Tigris River from February 2008 to January 2009. Four taxa representing new records for the freshwater algal flora of Turkey were identified from the river. They belong to the following phyla: 1 (Oscillatoria nitida) to Cyanoprokaryota, wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta. (Micractinium bornhemiense and Lagerheimia wratislaviensis) to Chlorophyta and 1 (Audouinella chalybaea) to Rhodophyta.

Özet

Planktonik algler, tatlısu ekosistemlerinin önemli bir bileşeni olmasına rağmen, onların çeşitliliği ve tür dağılımları hakkındaki bilgimiz hala oldukça zayıftır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin tatlısu mikroflora bilgisine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Şubat 2008 - Ocak 2009 tarihleri arasında Dicle Nehri'nde 7 siteden toplam 84 fitoplankton örneği toplandı. Nehirde, Türkiye tatlısu algleri için dört yeni tür teşhis edildi. Türlerden 1'i (Oscillatoria nitida) Cyanoprokaryota, 2'si (Micractinium bornhemiense ve Lagerheimia wratislaviensis) Chlorophyta ve 1'i (Audouinella chalybaea) Rhodophyta şubelerine aitti.

🔖

Cite This Article

VAROL, M., FUCIKOVA, K. (2015). Four New Records for the Freshwater Algae of Turkey. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 83–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/197658

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akar B, Şahin B. 2014. New desmid records of Karagöl Lake in Karagöl-Sahara National Park (ŞavşatArtvin/Turkey). Turk J Fish Aquat Sc. 14(1):269-274. doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v14_1_29 Aysel V. 2005. Check-list of the freshwater algae of Turkey. J Black Sea/Medit Environ. 11(1):1-124.
  2. Baykal T, Akbulut A, Açıkgöz İ, Udoh AU, Yıldız K, Şen B. 2009. New records for the freshwater algae of Turkey. Turk J Bot. 33(2):141-152. doi: 10.3906/bot-0705-10
  3. Bekleyen A, Gokot B, Varol M. 2011. Thirty-four new records and the diversity of the Rotifera in the Turkish part of the Tigris River watershed, with remarks on biogeographically interesting taxa. Sci Res Essays. 6(30):6270-6284. doi: 10.5897/SRE11.355 Broady PA, Flint EA, Nelson WA, Cassie Coope V, De Winton MD, Novis PM. 2012. Phylum Chlorophyta and Charophyta: green algae. In: Gordon DP, editor. New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. Volume Three. Kingdoms Bacteria, Protozoa, Chromista, Plantae, Fungi. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press. p. 347-381. Carauş I. 2012. Algae of Romania. A distributional checklist of actual algae. Version 2.3. Third revision. Bacau: Bacau University 809 p. Coesel PFM, Meesters KJ. 2007. Desmids of the lowlands: Mesotaeniaceae and Desmidaceae of the European Lowlands. Zeist: KNNV Publishing 352 p. Day SA, Wickham RP, Entwisle TJ, Tyler PA. 1995. Bibliographic check-list of non-marine algae in Australia. Canberra: Australian Biological Resources Study 276 p. Eloranta P, Kwandrans J. 2012. Illustrated guidebook to common freshwater red algae. Krakow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences 49 p. Fu?íková K, Johansen JR, Hall JD. 2015. A contribution to the desmid flora of Southeastern Maine. J Torrey Bot Soc. 142(2):166-178. doi: 0.3159/TORREY-D-14-00046.1 Guiry MD, Guiry GM. 2015. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway [cited 2015 May 21]. Available from http://www.algaebase.org
  4. Gül Ö, Düşen O, Erduğan H. 2013. The preliminary search results of cyanobacteria flora of thermal areas in Sarayköy (Denizli), Turkey. Paper presented at: Digital Proceeding of THE ICOEST'2013;
  5. Nevsehir, Turkey. Hu H, Wei Y. 2006. The freshwater algae of China. Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology. Bejjing: Science Press 1023 p. Johansen JR, Lowe RL, Carty S, Fu?iková K, Olsen CE, Fitzpatrick MH, Ress JA, Furey PC. 2007. New algal species records for Great Smoky Mountains National Park, with an annotated checklist of all reported algal taxa for th