Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Tying and Wrapping Materials and Their Color on Budding Success in Kiwifruit

Pages
119–124
Publication Date
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the soft rubbery plastic tape could be effectively used for tying the kiwifruit bud-grafts and white wrapping material increased the bud success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We studied the effect of tying and wrapping materials and their color on budding success in kiwifruit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The work was done in the open field during 2002-2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the soft rubbery plastic tape could be effectively used for tying the kiwifruit bud-grafts and white wrapping material increased the bud success.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002-2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kiwifruit · Actinidia deliciosa · chip-bud

Abstract

We studied the effect of tying and wrapping materials and their color on budding success in kiwifruit. The work was done in the open field during 2002-2003. Three-year-old, gallon container grown Hayward seedlings were chip-budded with Hayward chip-bud sticks in the first quarter of May. Raffia (black), cannabis fiber, leathery polyethylene band (white), soft rubbery polyethylene tape (white), paper tape, cotton yarn and plastic string (white) were used as tying and wrapping material in the first experiment. Green, red, black and white raffia was used as wrapping material in the second experiment. In the first trial, the soft rubbery plastic tape gave the highest graft-take (100%), sprouting rate (96.67% and 100%, respectively to the years), graft shoot diameter (7.58 mm and 7.62 mm, respectively to the years) and length (70.43 cm and 78.01 cm, respectively to the years). Paper tape gave the lowest results. In the second trial, the white raffia gave the best results on graft success (96.67% and 93.33%, respectively to the years) and graft shoot length and diameter. In conclusion, the soft rubbery plastic tape could be effectively used for tying the kiwifruit bud-grafts and white wrapping material increased the bud success. The conventional wraps like cannabis fiber, plastic string, cotton yarn or paper tape are not suitable for kiwifruit budding.

Özet

We studied the effect of tying and wrapping materials and their color on budding success in kiwifruit. The work was done in the open field during 2002-2003. Three-year-old, gallon container grown Hayward seedlings were chip-budded with Hayward chip-bud sticks in the first quarter of May. Raffia (black), cannabis fiber, leathery polyethylene band (white), soft rubbery polyethylene tape (white), paper tape, cotton yarn and plastic string (white) were used as tying and wrapping material in the first experiment. Green, red, black and white raffia was used as wrapping material in the second experiment. In the first trial, the soft rubbery plastic tape gave the highest graft-take (100%), sprouting rate (96.67% and 100%, respectively to the years), graft shoot diameter (7.58 mm and 7.62 mm, respectively to the years) and length (70.43 cm and 78.01 cm, respectively to the years). Paper tape gave the lowest results. In the second trial, the white raffia gave the best results on graft success (96.67% and 93.33%, respectively to the years) and graft shoot length and diameter. In conclusion, the soft rubbery plastic tape could be effectively used for tying the kiwifruit bud-grafts and white wrapping material increased the bud success. The conventional wraps like cannabis fiber, plastic string, cotton yarn or paper tape are not suitable for kiwifruit budding.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZENGINBAL, H., CELIK, H., OZCAN, M. (2006). The Effect of Tying and Wrapping Materials and Their Color on Budding Success in Kiwifruit. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/197557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Beineke, W.F. 1978. Parafilm: A new way to wrap grafts. HortScience 13: 284. Beutel, J. 1981. Kiwifruit Propagation. U.C. Davis Extension Service, p. 12. Connor, D.M. 1982. Cutting Propagation of Actinidia chinensis (Kiwifruit). Combined Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators Society, 32: 329-333.
  2. Monrovia Nursery Co., Azusa, California, USA. Diaz Hernandez, M.B. and J. Garcia Berrios. 1997. Performance of kiwifruit plant material propagated by different methods. Acta Horticult. 444: 155-169.
  3. Erifl, A. 1989. Türkiye İçin Yeni Bir Meyve Türü Kivi (Actinidia chinensis Planch.). T.C. Ziraat Bankası Kültür Yayınları No: 22, Ankara.
  4. Hartmann, H.T., D. Kester and F.T. Davies. 1990. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. Fifth Edition. Regents/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Howard, B.H. 1977. Chip budding fruit and ornamental trees. Proc. Inter. Plant. Prop. Soc. 27: 357-364.
  5. Howard, B.H., D.S. Skene and J.S. Coles. 1974. The effect of different grafting methods upon the development of one-year-old nursery apple trees. J. Hort. Sci. 49: 287-295.
  6. Kacar, B. 1989. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 1153, Ders Kitabı 323. Ankara.
  7. Kaflka, N. and M. Yılmaz. 1974. Bahçe Bitkileri Yetifltirme Tekniği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yay.: 79, Ders Kitabı 2. Lawes, G.S. 1992. Propagation of kiwifruit. MAF Ecology, Soil and Plant Research Group. Ruakura Agriculture Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand. Meyer R., 1988. Backyard growing of kiwifruit and related Actinidia. J. Calif. Agric. 3: 11-13
  8. Özcan, M. 2000. Değiflik uygulamaların kivi tohumlarının çimlenmesi üzerine etkileri. OMÜ, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15: 48-52.
  9. Sale, P.R. 1985. Kiwifruit Culture. Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand. Skene, D.S., H.R. Shepart and B.H. Howard. 1983. Characteristic anatomy of union formation in T- and chip-budded fruit and ornamental trees. J. Hort. Sci. 58: 295-299
  10. Soylu, A., A. Erifl, R. Türk, E. Barut and C. Türkben. 1995. Meyvecilik. T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Yay. No: 859, AÖF Yay.: 455, Eskiflehir. p. 421. Strik, B. and H. Cahn. 1996. Growing Kiwifruit. EC 1464. Oregon State University. Corvallis. Tanimoto, G. 1994. Propagation In: “Kiwifruit Growing and Handling” (Ed. J.K. Hasey, R.S. Johnson, J.A. Grant, W.O. Reil). Univ. of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 3344, pp. 21-24.
  11. Tuzcu, Ö., A. Doğrular, A. Demirkol, M. Kaplankıran and T. Yefliloğlu. 1987. Antalya Ekoloji