Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Terme Yakın Gebeliklerde Amniyon Sıvısı Miktarı ve Maternal Vücut Sıvıları

The Maternal Body Fluids and Amniotic Fluid in Near Term Pregnancies

Pages
66–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Our data favor that maternal BMI, volume of maternal body fluid compartments andplasma osmolality do not have any effect on amniotic fluid volume in near term pregnancies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the relationship between amniotic fluid volume and mainlyvolume of maternal body fluid compartments and secondly maternal obesity in near term pregnancies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN A case control study was conducted involving 211 women with near term singletonpregnancies who attended Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine between 2007 and 2009.Patients in Group 1(n=119), included near term pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid index (AFI) andGroup 2 included near term pregnancies complicated with idiopathic oligohydramnios (n=92).Oligohydramnios was diagnosed when AFI was measured <8 cm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Our data favor that maternal BMI, volume of maternal body fluid compartments andplasma osmolality do not have any effect on amniotic fluid volume in near term pregnancies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between amniotic fluid volume and mainlyvolume of maternal body fluid compartments and secondly maternal obesity in near term pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN A case control study was conducted involving 211 women with near term singletonpregnancies who attended Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine between 2007 and 2009.Patients in Group 1(n=119), included near term pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid index (AFI) andGroup 2 included near term pregnancies complicated with idiopathic oligohydramnios (n=92).Oligohydramnios was diagnosed when AFI was measured <8 cm. For determining maternal body fluidstatus we used valid formulas (defined in methods). Maternal body mass index (BMI), weight gain during pregnancy and volume of maternal body fluid compartments including total body water, intracellularfluid volume, extracellular fluid volume, interstitial fluid volume, plasma volume and plasma osmolalitywere compared between two groups.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of maternal BMI, weight inpartum, weight gain during pregnancy, volume of maternal body fluid compartments, plasma osmolality(p>0.05). Besides, there was no significant correlation with these parameters and AFI (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data favor that maternal BMI, volume of maternal body fluid compartments andplasma osmolality do not have any effect on amniotic fluid volume in near term pregnancies

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, terme yakın gebeliklerde, amni- yon sıvı miktarı ile maternal vücut sıvı kompartman hacimleri ve maternal obezite arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCIOĞLU, S. N., ALTINKAYA, S. Ö., KÜÇÜK, M., SEZER, S. D., ZAFER, E., YÜKSEL, H. (2015). Terme Yakın Gebeliklerde Amniyon Sıvısı Miktarı ve Maternal Vücut Sıvıları. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/197459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Nabhan AF, Abdelmoula YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for pre- venting adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;3:CD006593. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Barrilleaux PS, Martin JN Jr, Morrison JC. Predictability of intrapartum and neonatal outcomes with the amniotic fluid volume distribution: a reassessment using the amniotic fluid index, single deepest pocket, anda dye-determined amni- otic fluid volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1523-7.
  2. Phelan JP, Platt LD, Yeh S, Broussard P, Paul RH. The roles of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid volume in the management of the postdate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:304-8.
  3. Adams EA, MS, Choi HM, Cheung YC, Brace AR. Comparison of amniotic and intramembranous unidirec- tional permeabilities in late-gestation sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:247-55
  4. Flack NJ, Sepulveda W, Bower S, Fisk NM. Acute mater- nal hydration in third trimester oligohydramniosis: Effects on maternal fluid volume uteroplacental perfusion and fetal blood flow and urine output. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1186-91.
  5. Stookey JD, Burg M, Sellmeyer DE, Greenleaf JE, Arief A,Van Hove L, Gardner C, King JC. A proposed method for assessing plasma hypertonicity in vivo. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;61(1):143-6. World Health Organization. Global database on body mass index. Available from http://apps.who.int/bmi. (ac- cessed 01.01.2015) World Health Organization. Overweight and obesity 2014. Factsheet no.311. (accessed 01.01.2015)
  6. Purssell RA, Pudek M, Brubacher J, Abu-Laban RB. Derivation and validation of a Formula to calculate the contribution of ethanol to osmolal gap. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38(6):653-9.
  7. John T. Hansen, Bruce M. Koeppen, (2002). Netter's Atlas of Human Physiology. 1sted. Teterboro, N.J: Icon Learning Systems. Deutsch A, Deutsch E, Totten C, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes based on the gestational age of midtrimester preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1429-34.
  8. Hadi HA, Hodson CA, Strickland D. Premature rupture of the membranes between 20 and 25 weeks' gestation: role of amniotic fluid volume in perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1139-144 Harman CR. Amniotic fluid abnormalities. Semin Peri - natol 2008; 32:288-94.
  9. Magann EF, Isler CM, Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr. Amniotic fluid volume estimation and the biophysical profile: a confusion of criteria. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:640-2.
  10. Beall MH, Wijngaard JP,