Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Internal Mammary Artery and Lateral Thoracic Artery Width in Patients with Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors

Pages
101–105
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, in benign cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.31±0.70 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant, whereas in malignant cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.29±0.68 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant.Conclusion: The IMA and LTA diameters in benign and malignant cases were found to be higher in comparison with contralateral breast, independent of the size of the lesion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The main objective of this study was to analyze the differences in ipsilateral and contralateral internal mammary artery (IMA) and lateral thoracic artery (LTA) width in patients with malignant and benign breast tumor.Materials and Methods: A total of 104 female patients, of which 41 had benign and 63 had malignant tumors, were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The diameters of the IMA and LTA were measured from the widest point in T1-weighted post-contrast images.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, in benign cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.31±0.70 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant, whereas in malignant cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.29±0.68 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant.Conclusion: The IMA and LTA diameters in benign and malignant cases were found to be higher in comparison with contralateral breast, independent of the size of the lesion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this study was to analyze the differences in ipsilateral and contralateral internal mammary artery (IMA) and lateral thoracic artery (LTA) width in patients with malignant and benign breast tumor.Materials and Methods: A total of 104 female patients, of which 41 had benign and 63 had malignant tumors, were included in the study. The diameters of the IMA and LTA were measured from the widest point in T1-weighted post-contrast images. Breast magnetic resonance images were evaluated by a breast radiologist.Results: The ipsilateral IMA diameter of cases in the malignant group was found to be statistically significantly higher when compared with the benign group. In the benign group, the ipsilateral IMA diameter being an average of 0.43±0.87 mm larger than the contralateral IMA diameter was found to be statistically significant, whereas in the malignant cases, the ipsilateral IMA diameter being an average of 0.78±1.08 mm larger than the contralateral IMA diameter was found to be statistically significant. Also, in benign cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.31±0.70 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant, whereas in malignant cases, the ipsilateral LTA diameter being an average of 0.29±0.68 mm larger than the contralateral LTA diameter was found to be statistically significant.Conclusion: The IMA and LTA diameters in benign and malignant cases were found to be higher in comparison with contralateral breast, independent of the size of the lesion.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, G., ÇUBUK, R., ATASOY, M. M., ERCİYES, B. T. (2017). Comparison of Internal Mammary Artery and Lateral Thoracic Artery Width in Patients with Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 101–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/197384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Folkman J.Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 197; 18; 285(21): 1182-6
  2. Muthukkaruppan VR, Kubai L, Auerbach R. Tumor-induced neovascularization in the mouse eye. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69(3): 699- 708
  3. Stacker SA, Baldwin ME, Achen MG. The role of tumor lymphangiogenesis in metastatic spread. FASEB J 2002; 16(9): 922-34. [CrossRef] 4. Antonella Petrillo, Roberta Fusco, Salvatore Filice, Vincenza Granata, Orlando Catalano, Paolo Vallone et al. Breast contrast-enhanced MR imaging: semi-automated detection of vascular map and predominant feeding vessel. PLoS ONE 11 (8): e0161691. [CrossRef] 5. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 1990 3; 82(1): 4-6
  4. Salven P, Lymboussaki A, Heikkilä P, Jääskela-Saari H, Enholm B, Aase K, von Euler G, Eriksson U, Alitalo K, Joensuu H. Vascular endothelial growth factors VEGF-B and VEGF-C are expressed in human tumors. Am J Pathol 1998; 153(1): 103-8. [CrossRef] 7. Nishida N, Yano H, Nishida T, Kamura T, Kojiro M. Angiogenesis in Cancer. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2006; 2(3): 213-9. [CrossRef] 8. Holmgren L, O'Reilly MS, Folkman J. Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat Med 1995; 1(2): 149-53. [CrossRef] 9. Cobleigh MA, Langmuir VK, Sledge GW, Miller KD, Haney L, Novotny WF, et al. A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. SeminOncol 2003; 30(5 Suppl 16): 117-24. [CrossRef] 10. Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB, Gallardo AM, van Diest PJ, Stapper G, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(2): 355-64. [CrossRef] 11. Kang DK, Kim EJ, Kim HS, Sun JS, Jung YS. Correlation of wholebreast vascularity with ipsilateralbreast cancers using contrast-enhanced MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(2): 496-504. [CrossRef] 12. Fusco R, Sansone M, Filice S, Petrillo A.Breast contrast-enhanced MR imaging: semiautomatic detection of vascular map. Breast Cancer 2016 Mar;23(2): 266-72. [CrossRef] 13. Schipper RJ, Lobbes MB, Dikmans RE, Beets-Tan RG, Smidt ML, Boetes C. Bilateral analysis of the cross-sectional area of the internal mammary arteries and veins in patients with and without breast cancer on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging 2013; 4(2): 177-84. [CrossRef] 14. Gunningham SP, Currie MJ, Han C, Robinson