Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheostomies

Perkütan ve Cerrahi Trakeostomilerin Avantaj ve Dezavantajlarının Araştırılması

Pages
65–67
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Percutaneous tracheostomy is a method that can be safely performed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In our study, we aimed to evaluate surgical tracheostomy and percutaneous tracheostomy and to investigate their complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated medical records of 56 patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy (n=24) and surgical tracheostomy (n=32) in the otorhinolaryngology and anesthesiology clinics at our hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Percutaneous tracheostomy is a method that can be safely performed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In our study, we aimed to evaluate surgical tracheostomy and percutaneous tracheostomy and to investigate their complications. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated medical records of 56 patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy (n=24) and surgical tracheostomy (n=32) in the otorhinolaryngology and anesthesiology clinics at our hospital. Results: Fifty six patients evaluated and there was no statistically significant difference in terms of indications for tracheostomy between the groups. The duration of surgical tracheostomy was 21.2±2.9 minutes and that of percutaneous tracheostomy was 12.4±3.2 minutes and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Both surgical tracheostomy and percutaneous tracheostomy are safe and practiced methods. The duration of percutaneous tracheostomy was shorter than surgical tracheostomy in our study. Percutaneous tracheostomy is a method that can be safely performed.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmamızda cerrahi trakeostomiler ve perkütan trakeostomileri değerlendirmek ve komplikasyonları araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada, hastanemiz kulak burun boğaz ve anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon kliniklerinde gerçekleştirdiğimiz perkütan (n=24), cerrahi (n=32) trakeostomi açılmış 56 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Elli altı hasta değerlendirilmiştir ve trakeostomi endikasyonları açısından her iki grupta da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır. Cerrahi trakeostomi süresi 21,2±2,9, perkütan trakeostomi süresi 12,4±3,2 dakika olarak bulunmuştur ve bu farkın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,001). Sonuç: Cerrahi ve perkütan trakeostomilerin ikisi de güvenli ve uygulanan yöntemlerdir. Bizim çalışmamızda perkütan dilatasyonel trakeostomilerin süresi daha kısa bulunmuştur. Uygun hastalara kullanılabilecek bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACI, C., AÇIKALIN, R. M., AKKOÇ, İ., TOPTAŞ, M. (2018). Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheostomies. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1, 65–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/197321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Blot F, Melot C; Commission d’Epidemiologie et de Recherche C. Indications, timing, and techniques of tracheostomy in 152 French ICUs. Chest 2005;127:1347-52. PJ B. Management of the obstructed airway and tracheostomy. In: AG K, editor. Scott-Brown’s otolaryngology. Vol 5. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997. p. 1-20. Heffner JE. The role of tracheotomy in weaning. Chest 2001;120:477-81.
  2. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest 1996;110:480-5.
  3. Francois B, Clavel M, Desachy A, Puyraud S, Roustan J, Vignon P. Complications of tracheostomy performed in the ICU: subthyroid tracheostomy vs surgical cricothyroidotomy. Chest 2003;123:151-8.
  4. Paran H, Butnaru G, Hass I, Afanasyv A, Gutman M. Evaluation of a modified percutaneous tracheostomy technique without bronchoscopic guidance. Chest 2004;126:868-71.
  5. Karimpour HA, Vafaii K, Chalechale M, Mohammadi S, Kaviannezhad R. Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy via Griggs Technique. Arch Iran Med 2017;20:49-54.
  6. Çiçek M, Gedik E, Yücel A, Köroğlu A, Ersoy MÖ. Griggs tekniği ile açılan perkütan trakeostomi sonuçlarımız. Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 2007;14. Hazard P, Jones C, Benitone J. Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1018-24.
  7. Crofts SL, Alzeer A, McGuire GP, Wong DT, Charles D. A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patients. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:775-9.
  8. Hutchinson RC, Mitchell RD. Life-threatening complications from percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 1991;19:118-20.
  9. Heikkinen M, Aarnio P, Hannukainen J. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy? Critical care medicine 2000;28:1399-402.
  10. Toursarkissian B, Fowler CL, Zweng TN, Kearney PA. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in children and teenagers. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1421-4.
  11. Cobean R, Beals M, Moss C, Bredenberg CE. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure. Arch Surg 1996;131:265-71.
  12. Erden V, Hamzaoğlu NŞ, Başaranoğlu G, Delatioğlu H, Erkalp K. Percu Twist” Yöntemi ile Perkütan Trakeostomi. Yoğun Bakım Dergisi 2004;4:57-60.
  13. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 2000;118:1412-8.