Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Diversity of bats in three selected forest types in Peninsular Malaysia

Pages
142–155
Publication Date
2021-03-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study showed that the primary forest is more diversified compared to other habitats although more individuals were recorded in the secondary forest.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bats, occupying a variety of habitats, play important roles in the tropical forest.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sampling was conducted between 18:30 PM and 06:30 AM using 10 mist-nets and four harp traps for three consecutive nights at the primary and secondary forest of Ulu Gombak Forest Reserve and urban forest in the Universiti Malaya Botanical Garden.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study showed that the primary forest is more diversified compared to other habitats although more individuals were recorded in the secondary forest.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Primary forest · secondary forest · urban forest

Abstract

Bats, occupying a variety of habitats, play important roles in the tropical forest. Through this study, comparisons on bat species richness and evenness in primary forest, secondary forest, and urban forest were made. Sampling was conducted between 18:30 PM and 06:30 AM using 10 mist-nets and four harp traps for three consecutive nights at the primary and secondary forest of Ulu Gombak Forest Reserve and urban forest in the Universiti Malaya Botanical Garden. This study progressed from February 2012 until April 2014. A total number of 1226 individuals representing 46 species were managed to be captured throughout the period of this study. From this, a total of 396 individuals of bats from 33 species were recorded in primary forest, 608 individuals of bats from 31 species were recorded in secondary forest and 222 individuals of bats from 11 species were recorded in the urban forest. The primary forest (Shannon–Wiener, H’ = 2.516) has a higher diversity of bats compared to the secondary forest (Shannon–Wiener, H’ = 2.476) and the urban forest (Shannon–Wiener, H’ = 1.527). However, the urban forest has a higher evenness index calculated (E = 0.4184) compared to the primary forest (E = 0.3994) and the secondary forest (E = 0.3718). Species richness in the secondary forest is the highest (Dmn = 1.616) followed by the primary forest (Dmn = 1.257) and the urban forest (Dmn = 0.7383). This study showed that the primary forest is more diversified compared to other habitats although more individuals were recorded in the secondary forest.

🔖

Cite This Article

NASİR, N. M., NASİR, D. M., RAMLİ, R. (2021). Diversity of bats in three selected forest types in Peninsular Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 142–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/197284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Acharya Pushpa Raj, 2015, Journal of Pollination Ecology, V15, P44 Appanah S., 1990, Man and the Biosphere Series, V7, P85 Aziz SA, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P8670, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3213 Azlan J. Mohd., 2000, Malayan Nature Journal, V54, P69 Balete DS, 2010, ASIA LIFE SCI, V4, P111. Barlow K., 1999, EXPEDITION FIELD TEC. Bonaccorso FJ, 1997, J MAMMAL, V78, P1073, DOI 10.2307/1383050 Brosset A, 1996, CAN J ZOOL, V74, P1974, DOI 10.1139/z96-224 Campbell P, 2006,
  2. BIOTROPICA, V38, P725, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00203.x Clarke FM, 2005, CONSERV BIOL, V19, P1194, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00170.x Corlett RT, 2004, BIOL REV, V79, P497, DOI 10.1017/S1464793103006341 Cosson JF, 1999, J TROP ECOL, V15, P515, DOI 10.1017/S026646749900098X Cueto VR, 1999, J BIOGEOGR, V26, P487, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00299.x Danielsen F, 1995, MANAGEMENT TROPICAL. Davison GWH, 2007, P SEM WORKSH STAT BI, P3. Denzinger A, 2013, FRONT PHYSIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00164 Didham RK, 1996, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V11, P255, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(96)20047-3 Estrada-Villegas S, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.009 Evelyn MJ, 2003,
  3. BIOTROPICA, V35, P405, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00594.x Feng Q, 2008, ZOOL SCI, V25, P225, DOI 10.2108/zsj.25.225 Francis C., 2019, FIELD GUIDE MAMMALS. Francis C. M., 2008, FIELD GUIDE MAMMALS. Francis CM, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012575 FRANCIS CM, 1989, J MAMMAL, V70, P865, DOI 10.2307/1381730 Frick WF, 2020, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1469, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.14045 FUJITA MS, 1991, CONSERV BIOL, V5, P455, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00352.x Fukuda D, 2009, RAFFLES B ZOOL, V57, P213. Gibson L, 2011,
  4. NATURE, V478, P378, DOI 10.1038/nature10425 Heim O, 2017, ECOL PROCESS, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0091-7 Hein CD, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P1200, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.054 Henderson LE, 2008, J MAMMAL, V89, P952, DOI 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-214.1 Hodgkison R, 2004,
  5. BIOTROPICA, V36, P522, DOI 10.1646/1593 Hodgkison R, 2004, J TROP ECOL, V20, P667, DOI 10.1017/S0266467404001737 Hodgkison R, 2003,
  6. BIOTROPICA, V35, P491, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00606.x Hogberg LK, 2002, AM MIDL NAT, V148, P282, DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148[0282:UBBOPO]2.0.CO;2 KALKO EKV, 1995, ANIM BEHAV, V50, P861, DOI 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80090-5 Karuppudurai T., 2018, Journal of Threatened Taxa, V10, P12163, DOI 10.11609/jott.3850.10.9.12163-12172 Ketol B, 2009, JOUNAL TROPICAL BIOL, V5, P61. Kingston T., 2012, Malaysi