Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

KARMA MODELLİ MONTAJ HATLARINDA ÜRETİM ÇİZELGELEME VE SIRALAMA PROBLEMLERİNDE ÜRETİM DÜZGÜNLEŞTİRME YAKLAŞIMLARI

AN APPROACH OF PRODUCTION SMOOTHING FOR PRODUCTION SCHEDULING AND SEQUENCING IN MIXED-MODEL ASSEMBLY LINES

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2015-08-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In sequencing stage, the work sequence of automobile models in assemble line is determined with modified Goal Chasing method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mixed model assembly line is able to produce more than one product type at the same time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The problem is handled for 50 product with two approach as scheduling and sequencing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In sequencing stage, the work sequence of automobile models in assemble line is determined with modified Goal Chasing method.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karma model montaj hattı · Üretim düzgünleştirme · Çizelgeleme

Abstract

Mixed model assembly line is able to produce more than one product type at the same time. Mixed model assembly line can adapt to the varied small size batch production, not keep the inventory to the work in process through verity of product and can quickly response to the abrupt change of demand. Due to the mentioned attributes of mixed model assembly line, waiting/ accumulations in the work stationary. For solving this problem, the production smoothing model are presented. The smoothing production aims to reduce the size of batch and flow as a unique products/ parts/ raw materials throughout the whole system. In this study, the solution of models that response to demand for certain time at “just in time” according to the JIT approach and “no stock” according to the Lean philosophy in mixed model assemble line in automotive firm. The problem is handled for 50 product with two approach as scheduling and sequencing. In scheduling stage, three solving methods are presented and alternative solutions are obtained for balanced production desired from firm and considering constraints. This solutions are compared with several criteria. In sequencing stage, the work sequence of automobile models in assemble line is determined with modified Goal Chasing method.

Özet

Karma model montaj hatları, aynı anda iki ya da daha fazla ürün tipinin aynı hat üzerindeüretilebildiği, çeşitlendirilmiş küçük parti üretimine yatkın ve modellerin çeşitliliğine rağmen fazla stokbulundurmadan, ani talep değişikliklerine hızlı cevap verebilen montaj hatlarıdır. Bahsedilen buözelliklerinden dolayı, iş istasyonlarında beklemeler/ yığılmalar söz konusu olmaktadır. Bu problemeçözüm olarak, üretim düzgünleştirme modelleri önerilmektedir. Üretim düzgünleştirme, partibüyüklüklerini azaltmayı ve tüm sistem boyunca ürünlerin/ parçaların/ malzemelerin düzeltilmiş tekparça akışını oluşturmasını amaçlar

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, H., ERGİNEL, N. (2015). KARMA MODELLİ MONTAJ HATLARINDA ÜRETİM ÇİZELGELEME VE SIRALAMA PROBLEMLERİNDE ÜRETİM DÜZGÜNLEŞTİRME YAKLAŞIMLARI. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/196853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chakravarty, A. K. and Shtub A., (1985)“New Technology Production Systems”, Decision Science, vol. 16(3), 248-264.
  2. Multistage Dar-El, E. M. And Cother R.F., (1975) “Assembly Line Sequencing for Model mix”, International Journal of Production Research, 13, 463-477.
  3. Dar-El, E. M. and Rabinovitch M., (1988) Planning and “Optimal Assembly Lines”, International Journal of Production Research, vol.26, 1433-1450. Dar-El E. M., and Cucuy, (1977). “Optimal Mixed Model Sequencing for Balanced Assembly Lines”, Omega, vol.5, 333-342.
  4. Emde, S. and Boysen N., (2012). “Optimally Routing and Scheduling Tow Trains for JIT- Supply of Mixed-Model Assembly Lines”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 217, 287–299.
  5. Inman, P. R. and Bulfin R. L., (1991). “Note on Sequencing JIT Mixed-Model Assembly Lines”, Management Science, vol. 3 (7), 904–910.
  6. James, P., Womack D.T., Jones, D.R. (1992) “The Machine that Changed The World”, Business Horizons, vol. 35(3), 81-82. Karimi-Nasab M. and Aryanezhad M.B., (2001) “A Multi-Objective Production Smoothing Model Times”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, 3596–3610.
  7. Operating Macaskill, J. L. C., (1972) “Production-Line Balanced Management Science, vol. 19(4), 423-434. Lines”. Mansouri, S.A., (2005) “A Multi-Objective Genetic Sequencing European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 167(3), 696–716. for Assembly Lines”, on JIT McMullen, P. R. and Frazier G.V., (2000) “A Simulated Annealing Approach to Mixed- Model Sequencing with Multiple Objectives on a JIT Line”, IIE Transactions, vol. 3(8), 679–686.
  8. McMullen, P. R., (1998) “JIT Sequencing for Mixed-Model Assembly Lines with Setups using Tabu Search”, Production Planning and Control, vol.9 (5), 504–510.
  9. McMullen, P. R., (2001a) “An Ant Colony Optimization Approach to Addressing A JIT Sequencing Objectives”, Engineering, vol.15, 309–317.
  10. Intelligence in McMullen, P. R., (2001b) “A Kohonen Self- Organizing Map Approach to Addressing A Multiple Objective, Sequencing Problem”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 72, 59–71.
  11. Meral, S. and Erkip N., (1991) "Design and Analysis of A Just-In-Time Production Line", International Conference on Just-in-Time Manufacturing Systems, 61-79. of the Meral, S. and Korkmazel T., (2001) “Bi-Criteria Sequencing Methods for The Mixed-Model Assembly Line in Just-in-Time Production Systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol 131, 188–207.
  12. Miltenburg, J., (1989) “Level Schedules for Mixed-Model Assembly Lines in Just-in