Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

APPLICABILITY OF TIME-DEPENDENT SEISMICITY MODEL FOR EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCE ALONG THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT ZONE

Pages
238–251
Publication Date
2019-09-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the basis of these equations and taking into account the formation time and magnitude of the last events in each zone, probabilities to the next main shocks in five decades and the magnitudes of the next events were estimated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The applicability of the time-dependent seismicity model was investigated for earthquakes occurrence along the North Anatolian Fault Zone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This region was separated into thirteen seismogenic zones by virtue of specific seismological and geomorphological criteria, and RTIMAP (regional time and magnitude predictable) model was applied for these zones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the basis of these equations and taking into account the formation time and magnitude of the last events in each zone, probabilities to the next main shocks in five decades and the magnitudes of the next events were estimated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:North Anatolian Fault Zone · Time-dependent Seismicity · RTIMAP

Abstract

The applicability of the time-dependent seismicity model was investigated for earthquakes occurrence along the North Anatolian Fault Zone. This region was separated into thirteen seismogenic zones by virtue of specific seismological and geomorphological criteria, and RTIMAP (regional time and magnitude predictable) model was applied for these zones. The data including in both instrumental period (Ms ³ 5.5) until the beginning of 2016 and historical period (Io ³ 9.0 corresponding to Ms ³ 7.0) before 1900 have been used in the study. Interevent times and magnitudes of mainshocks generated in each zone have predictive properties expressed by the RTIMAP. For the region considered, the relationship with increasing slope between the time interval of the events and the magnitude of the preceding earthquake shows that this model is suitable. On the basis of these equations and taking into account the formation time and magnitude of the last events in each zone, probabilities to the next main shocks in five decades and the magnitudes of the next events were estimated.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYIL, N. L. (2019). APPLICABILITY OF TIME-DEPENDENT SEISMICITY MODEL FOR EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCE ALONG THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT ZONE. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 238–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/196832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 1968; 58: 1583–1606
  2. Caputo M. Analysis of seismic risk. Nato Advanced Study Institutes Series. Appl Sci 1974; 3, Noordhoff-Leiden
  3. Shah HC, Movassate M. Seismic risk analysis of California state water project. Proc of Fifth European Conf on Earthq Eng 1975; 2: 156
  4. Papadopoulos GA, Voidomatis P. Evidence for periodic seismicity in the inner Aegean seismic zone. Pure Appl Geophys 1987; 125: 613-628
  5. Wesnousky SG, Scholz K, Matsuda T. Integration of geological and seismological data for analysis of seismic hazard: a case study of Japan. Bull Seism Soc Am 1984; 74: 687–708
  6. Papazachos BC. A time- and magnitude-predictable model for generation of shallow earthquakes in the Aegean Area. Pure Appl Geophys 1992; 138: 2, 287–308
  7. Stein RS, Barka AA, Dietrich JH. Progressive failure on the north Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering, Geophys J Intern 1997; 128: 594–604
  8. Parsons T, Toda S, Stein RS. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: an interaction based probability calculation. Science 2000; 288: 661–665
  9. Mulargia F, Geller RJ. Earthquake science and seismic risk reduction. Kluwer Dordrecht, 2003
  10. Coral A. Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history, Tectonophysics, 2006; 424: 177–193
  11. Shanker D, Panthi A, Singh HN. Long-term seismic hazard analysis in Northeast Himalaya and its adjoining regions. Geosci J 2012; 2: 25–32
  12. Papazachos BC, Papaioannou ChA. Long-term earthquake prediction in the Aegean Area based on a time and magnitude predictable model. Pure Appl Geophys 1993; 140: 4, 593–612
  13. Mogi K. Earthquake Prediction, Academic Press. University of Tokyo, 1985
  14. Shanker D. Characteristic studies of tectonics, Seismicity and occurrences of major earthquakes in northeast India. PhD Thesis, Banaras Hindu University 117, 1990
  15. Shanker D, Singh VP. Regional Time- and Magnitude predictable Seismicity model for north-east India and vicinity. Acta Geod Geophys Hu 1996; 31: 1–2, 181–190
  16. Shanker D, Singh HN. Application of the time-predictable model in Peninsular India for future seismic hazard assessment. Acta Geophys 2007; 55: 3, 302–312
  17. Paudyal H, Singh HN, Shanker D, Singh VP. Validity of Time-Predictable Seismicity Model for Nepal and its Adjoining Regions. J Nepal Geol Soc 2008; 38: 15–22
  18. Papazachos BC, Karakaisis GF, Scordilis EM.