Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Data-Driven Trajectory Uncertainty Quantification For Climbing Aircraft To Improve Ground-Based Trajectory Prediction

Pages
323–345
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the simulations, the impact of reducing the uncertainty in aircraft mass on climb time is illustrated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efficient trajectory prediction tools will be the crucial functions in future trajectory-based operations (TBO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the operational concerns, aircraft take-off weight and climb speed intent, which are key performance parameters that define climb profiles, is not entirely available to round-based trajectory prediction infrastructure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the simulations, the impact of reducing the uncertainty in aircraft mass on climb time is illustrated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flight Trajectory Uncertainty · Aircraft Climb · Uncertainty Reduction

Abstract

Efficient trajectory prediction tools will be the crucial functions in future trajectory-based operations (TBO). In addition to win and controller actions, uncertainties in climbing flights are major components of prediction errors in a flight trajectory. Due to the operational concerns, aircraft take-off weight and climb speed intent, which are key performance parameters that define climb profiles, is not entirely available to round-based trajectory prediction infrastructure. In the scope of air traffic flow management, sector entry and exit times, including where the climb ends and descending starts, are the main inputs for demand- capacity balancing processes. In this work, we have focused on uncertainties over climb trajectory to quantify and analyze their impact on climb times to cruise altitudes. We have used model-driven data statistical approaches through aircraft flight record data sets (i.e. QAR). As result of this analyze, probabilistic definitions are generated for aircraft take-off weight and speed intent. The regression between these climb parameters and flight distance is acquired to reduce the uncertainty at strategical level. Moreover, reducing climb uncertainty through adaptive uncertainty reduction is also demonstrated at the tactical level of flight. Through the simulations, the impact of reducing the uncertainty in aircraft mass on climb time is illustrated.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, M., KOYUNCU, E. (2017). Data-Driven Trajectory Uncertainty Quantification For Climbing Aircraft To Improve Ground-Based Trajectory Prediction. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 323–345. https://ajindex.com/articles/196779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Consortium. “The ATM Target Concept (D3)”, 2007. • Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, “FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2012-2032,”, Mar. 2012. • ICAO, Trajectory Based Operations Concept Document (TBOCD), Air Traffic Management Requirements And Performance Panel (ATMRPP), ATMRPP-WG/28-WP/652, 17/02/15 • Green, M. S., Mondoloni, S., Paglione, M., Swierstra, S., Irvine, R. and Garcia-Avello, C., White th Paper, “Common Methodology and Resources for the Validation and Improvement of Trajectory Prediction Capabilities”, 2006 • Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, “ADAPT2: Aircraft Data Aiming at Predicting the Trajectory”, Dec. 2009 • Coppenbarger, R. A., “Climb Trajectory Prediction Enhancement Using Airline Flight-Planning Information”, AIAA-99-4147, 1999 • McNally, D. and Thipphavong, D., “Automated Separation Assurance in the Presence of Uncertainty”, 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2008 • Thipphavong, D., “Analysis of a Multi-Trajectory Conflict Detection Alorithm for Climbing Flights”, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology Integration and Operations Conference, September 2009,
  2. Hilton Head, South Carolina • Casado, E., Goodchild, C. and Vilaplana, M., “Sensitivity of Trajectory Prediction Accuracy to Aircraft Performance Uncertainty”, AIAA Infotech at Aerospace Conference, August 2013, Boston MA • Margellos, K and Lygeros, J., “Toward 4D Trajectory Management in Air Traffic Control: A Study Based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Reachability Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 21, no. 5, September 2013 • Liu, W and Hwang, I., “Probabilistic Trajectory Prediction and Conflict Detection for Air Traffic Control”, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 6, December 2011 • Knorr, D and Walter, L., “Trajectory Uncertainty and the Impact on Sector Complexity and Workload”, SESAR Innovation Days, December 2011 • Kim, J., Tandale, M. and Menon P. K., “Air-Traffic Uncertainty Models for Queuing Analysis”, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, September 2009,
  3. Hilton Head, South Carolina • Mueller, T. K., Sorensen J. A. and Couluris G. J., “Strategic Aircraft Trajectory Prediction Uncertainty and Statistical Sector Traffic Load Modeling”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, August 2002,
  4. Monterrey, California • Chan, W., Bach, R. and Walton, J., “Improving and Validating CTAS Performance