Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

-

ELEKTROSPİNNİNG PARAMETRELERİNİN JELATİN/BİYOAKTİF CAM NANOLİF YAPISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
135–144
Publication Date
2015-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the adequacy of the model was examined by conducting additional experiments that were not employed in the model generation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, an electrospinning procedure was carried out in order to develop a simple and effective tool for fabricating gelatin/bioactive glass (Gt/BG) nanofibers with a controllable and predictable fiber diameter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a quadratic model was obtained within the context of response surface methodology based on a three-level, three-variable Box–Behnken design technique to describe the relationship between the fiber diameter and the electrospinning parameters, namely BG content, tip-to-collector distance, and flow rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the adequacy of the model was examined by conducting additional experiments that were not employed in the model generation
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elektrospinning · Jelatin · Biyoaktif Cam

Abstract

In the present study, an electrospinning procedure was carried out in order to develop a simple and effective tool for fabricating gelatin/bioactive glass (Gt/BG) nanofibers with a controllable and predictable fiber diameter. For this purpose, a quadratic model was obtained within the context of response surface methodology based on a three-level, three-variable Box–Behnken design technique to describe the relationship between the fiber diameter and the electrospinning parameters, namely BG content, tip-to-collector distance, and flow rate. Meanwhile, the quality of fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficients of determination (R-square) and the analysis of variances. Moreover, the adequacy of the model was examined by conducting additional experiments that were not employed in the model generation

Özet

Bu çalışmada, malzeme ve proses değişkenlerinin jelatin/biyoaktif cam (Gt/BG) nanokompozit liflerinin çapı üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla; farklı oranlarda biyoaktif cam tozu içeren jelatin çözeltilerine elektrospinning işlemi uygulanarak nanokompozit malzemeler üretilmiştir. Biyoaktif cam içeriğinin, uç ile toplayıcı arasındaki açıklığın ve çözelti akış hızının ortalama lif çapı üzerindeki etkileri yanıt yüzey yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak; üç değişkenli ve üç seviyeli Box–Benkhen tasarım yöntemi kullanılarak ikinci dereceden bir model oluşturulmuş ve geliştirilen bu model aracılığı ile değişkenlerin etkinlikleri değerlendirilerek, hedeflenen lif çapının sağlanması için gerekli proses koşullarının tahmin edilebileceği basit ve etkin bir yöntem geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNEN, S., ERTÜRK, B., TÜCCAR, E., TAYGUN, M. E., KÜÇÜKBAYRAK, S. (2015). -. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 135–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/196742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aliabadi, M. Irani, M., Ismaeili, J. and Najafzadeh, S. (2014). Design and Evaluation of Chitosan/Hydroxyapatite Composite Nanofiber Membrane for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 45(2), 518–526.
  2. Allo, B.A., Rizkalla, A.S. and Mequanint, K. (2010). Synthesis and Electrospinning of ε- Polycaprolactone-Bioactive Glass Hybrid Biomaterials Via a Sol-Gel Process. Langmuir 26(23), 18340–18348.
  3. Andric, T., Sampson, A.C. and Freeman, J.W. (2011). Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Osteon Mimicking Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials Science and Engineering C 31(1), 2–8.
  4. Asran, A.S., Henning, S. and Michler, G.H. (2010). Polyvinyl Alcohol–Collagen–Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite Nanofibrous Scaffold: Mimicking the Key Features of Natural Bone at the Nanoscale Level. Polymer 51(4), 868–876.
  5. Brun, P., Ghezzo, F., Roso, M., Danesin, R., Palù, G., Bagno, A., Modesti, M., Castagliuolo, I. and Dettin, M. (2011). Electrospun Scaffolds of Self-Assembling Peptides with Poly(ethylene oxide) for Bone Tissue Engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 7(6), 2526–2532.
  6. Chang, W., Mu, X., Zhu, X., Ma, G., Li, C., Xu, F. and Nie, J. (2013). Biomimetic Composite Scaffolds Based Mineralization of Hydroxyapatite on Electrospun Calcium-Containing Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanofibers. Materials Science and Engineering C 33(7), 4369–4376.
  7. Chen, J.P. and Chang, Y.S. (2011). Preparation and Characterization of Composite Nanofibers of Polycaprolactone and Nanohydroxyapatite for Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 86(1), 169–175.
  8. Chong, E.J., Phan, T.T., Lim, I.J., Zhang, Y.Z., Bay, B.H., Ramakrishna, S. and Lim, C.T. (2007). Evaluation of Electrospun PCL/Gelatin Nanofibrous Scaffold for Wound Healing and Layered Dermal Reconstitution. Acta Biomaterialia 3(3), 321-330.
  9. Doustgani, A., Vasheghani-Farahani, E., Soleimani, M. and Hashemi-Najafabadi, S. (2012). Optimizing the Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Polycaprolactone and Nanohydroxyapatite Composite Nanofibers. Composites Part B: Engineering 43(4), 1830–1836.
  10. Frohbergh, M.E., Katsman, A., Botta, G.P., Lazarovici, P., Schauer, C.L., Wegst, U.G.K. and Lelkes, P.I. (2012). Electrospun Hydroxyapatite-Containing Chitosan Nanofibers Crosslinked with Genipin for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 33(36), 9167–9178.
  11. Gao, C., Gao, Q., Li, Y., Rahaman, M.N., Teramoto, A., Abe, K. (2013). In Vitro Evaluatio