Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

ELECTRO HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION SYSTEM DESIGN WITH OPTIMAL STATE DERIVATIVE FEEDBACK CONTROLLER

Pages
777–787
Publication Date
2017-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Throughout the numerical simulation studies, bump type road irregularities at different vehicle forward velocities are applied to evaluate the performances of the controller in terms of ride comfort and safety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is concerned with a control design of an electro-hydraulic suspension system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller, a two-degree-of-freedom quarter vehicle suspension model equipped with an electro hydraulic actuator is preferred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Throughout the numerical simulation studies, bump type road irregularities at different vehicle forward velocities are applied to evaluate the performances of the controller in terms of ride comfort and safety.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:State derivative feedback · optimal control · electro-hydraulic suspension

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a control design of an electro-hydraulic suspension system. In some practical problems, for instance in the active suspension design, the state derivative signals such as acceleration and velocity are easier to obtain rather than the state variables such as displacement and velocity, since the most commonly used sensors are the accelerometers. Hence, design of an optimal state derivative feedback controller is proposed by employing the linear matrix inequalities framework. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller, a two-degree-of-freedom quarter vehicle suspension model equipped with an electro hydraulic actuator is preferred. Throughout the numerical simulation studies, bump type road irregularities at different vehicle forward velocities are applied to evaluate the performances of the controller in terms of ride comfort and safety.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVER, M., SENDUR, H. S., YAZİCİ, H., ARSLAN, M. S. (2017). ELECTRO HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION SYSTEM DESIGN WITH OPTIMAL STATE DERIVATIVE FEEDBACK CONTROLLER. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 777–787. https://ajindex.com/articles/196682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hedrick JK, Butsuen T. Invariant properties of automotive suspensions. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut 1990; 204: 21-27
  2. Tamboli JA, Joshi SG. Optimum design of a passive suspension system of a vehicle subjected to actual random road excitations. J Sound Vib 1999; 219: 193-205
  3. Gordon TJ, Sharp RS. On improving the performance of automotive semi-active suspension systems through road preview. J Sound Vib 1998; 217: 163-182
  4. Kojima H, Nakano J, Nakayama H, Kawashima N, Fujimoto H. Development of new Toyota electronic modulated suspension-two concepts for semi-active suspension control. SAE Technical Paper 911900 1991
  5. Chen H, Guo KH. Constrained H∞ control of active suspensions: an LMI approach. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2005; 13: 412-421
  6. Akatsu Y, Fukushima N, Talcahashj K, Satch M, Kawaranki Y. An active suspension employing an electorhydraulic pressure control system. SAE Technical Paper 905123 1990
  7. Merker T, Gaston G, Olaf T. Active body control (ABC) Daimler Chrysler active suspension and damping sysrem. SAE Technical Paper 2002-21-0054 2002
  8. Hrovat D. Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica 1997; 33: 1781-1817
  9. Ulsoy GA, Hrovat D, Tseng T. Stability robustness of LQ and LQG active suspensions. J Dyn Syst-T ASME 1994; 116: 123-131
  10. Abdel-Hady MBA. Active suspension with preview control. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1994; 23: 1-13
  11. Elmadany MM, Al-majed MI. Quadratic synthesis of active controls for a quarter-car model. J Vib Control 2001; 7: 1237-1252
  12. Han SY, Tang GY, Chen YH, Yang XX, Yang X. Optimal vibration control for vehicle suspension discrete time systems with actuator time delay. Asian J Control 2013; 15: 1579-1588
  13. Olalla C, Leyva R, El Aroudi A, Queinnec I. Robust LQR control for PWM converters: an LMI approach. IEEE T Ind Electron 2009; 56: 2548-2558
  14. Elmi N, Ohadi A, Samadi B. Active front steering control of a sport utility vehicle using a robust linear quadratic regulator method, with emphasis on the roll dynamics. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut 2013; 227: 1636-1649
  15. Sever M, Kaya EE, Arslan MS, Yazici H. Active trailer braking system design with linear matrix inequalities based multi-objective robust LQR controller for vehicle-trailer systems. In: IEEE 2016 Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles; 19–22 Jun 2016; Gothenburg, Sweden: IEEE. pp. 726-731
  16. Aktas A, Sever M, Yazici H. Gain scheduling LQR control of linear parameter varying overhead crane. In: