Journals / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Conceptual Study on Tourist Attraction of Brand Cities: Antalya and St. Petersburg Cases

Pages
1608–1624
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The importance of city branding was tried to be emphasized for two important cities of Turkey and Russia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Determination of the contributions of the cities, which have become a brand by providing an added value to the national economy, to the tourism sector is of socio-economic importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Information on the cities were obtained through screening the statistics of the 2019 JanuaryDecember term of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey, St.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The importance of city branding was tried to be emphasized for two important cities of Turkey and Russia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Determination of the contributions of the cities, which have become a brand by providing an added value to the national economy, to the tourism sector is of socio-economic importance. This study, prepared from this point of view, takes Antalya as a city of sea/shore and St. Petersburg as a city of culture. Document analysis was performed taking into account the number of tourists coming to these brand cities, the purpose for visiting the cities, the number of overnight stays and the tourism income parameters of those cities. For this, document analysis method was used, which is one of the qualitative research methods and aims to analyze written materials with information about the subject. However, contribution of brand cities to tourism is analyzed from secondary data, and information is given also on the current status of the tourism market. Information on the cities were obtained through screening the statistics of the 2019 JanuaryDecember term of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey, St. Petersburg City Administration, Antalya Provincial Culture and Tourism Directorate and Association of Turkish Travel Agencies (TÜRSAB). In the light of this information, the distinguishing features of these cities, which are prominent in tourist attraction, were determined. It was seen that most of the tourists visiting Antalya come for marine / coastal tourism while tourists visiting St. Petersburg come for business and culture tourism especially from China, Germany and Finland. The importance of city branding was tried to be emphasized for two important cities of Turkey and Russia.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜTCÜ, G., EMİR, O., AKSÖZ, E. O. (2020). Conceptual Study on Tourist Attraction of Brand Cities: Antalya and St. Petersburg Cases. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1608–1624. https://ajindex.com/articles/196395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akkaya, E. (1999). Marka ı̇majı bileşenleri, otomobil sektöründe bir uygulama. 4. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitapçığı. Hatay, Turkey. 101-111.
  2. Aktuğlu, I. K. (2018). Marka yönetimi: Güçlü ve başarılı markalar ı̇çin temel ı̇lkeler. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  3. Anholt, S. (2006). How the world sees the world's cities. Place Branding, 2(1), 18-31.
  4. Atak, O. (2009). Türk turı̇zmı̇nı̇n tanıtımında festı̇vallerı̇n yerı̇ ve önemı̇: Antalya örneğı̇. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Avraham, E. (2004). Media strategies for improving an unfavorable city image. Elsevier Cities, 21(6), 471-479.
  5. Beerli, A. & Martin, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image, annals of tourism research. Oxford UK: Pergamon Press.
  6. Bişkin, H. (2013). Kentlerde markalaşma Beykoz örneği. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Braun, E. (2008). City marketing: Towards an integrated approach. Rotterdam: Erasmus University. Cevizci, A. (1997). Felsefe sözlüğü. İstanbul: Ekin Yayınevi.
  7. Darel, P. E. (2004). World cities as hegemonic projects: The politics of global imagineering in Montreal. Political Geography, 23(5), 571-596.
  8. Erdil, T. S. & Uzun, Y. (2009). Marka olmak. İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş. Ergun, N., Bayrak, R. & Doğan, S. (2019). Turizm pazarlaması için önemli bir pazarlama kanalı olan instagram’da nitel bir araştırma. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 82-100. Gökaliler, E. (2017). Şehirlerin markalaşması sürecinde marka konumlandırmasının rolü: Seferihisar cittaslow üzerine bir ı̇nceleme. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 5(1), 326-342.
  9. Greenberg, M. (2008). Branding New York: How a city in crisis was sold to the world. London: Routledge. Herget, J., Petru, Z. & Abrhám, J. (2015). City branding and its economic impacts on tourism. Economics and Sociology, 8(1). 119-126.
  10. Işık, M. & Erdem A. (2015). Nasıl marka şehir olunur. Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
  11. Işık, Ş. & Zoğal, V. (2017). Turizm kentleşmesi kavramı: Antalya örneği. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 26 (2), 71-94. İlban, M.O. (2007). Destinasyon pazarlamasında marka ı̇majı ve seyahat acentalarında bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir. İsen, İ. (2013). Bı̇r şehrı̇n markalaşması ve şehı̇r pazarlaması açısından ı̇ncelenmesı̇: Örnek bı̇r uygulama. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi,
  12. Niğde. Kavaratzis, M. & Ashworth, G. J. (2005). City branding: an effective ass