Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 5

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

The comparative efŞcacy of kinesio taping and local injection therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome

Pages
483–488
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of kinesio taping (KT) and localsubacromial injection in patients with subacromial impingement, syndrome (SIS) with regard to pain,range of motion (ROM) and disability.Methods: Sixty-one patients (48 females and 13 males; mean age: 43.04± 6.31, years) with SIS wereenrolled into the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were randomized into two treatment groups receiving either a singlecorticosteroid and local anesthetic (LA) injection, or kinesio taping performed three times by intervals of 3day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of kinesio taping (KT) and localsubacromial injection in patients with subacromial impingement, syndrome (SIS) with regard to pain,range of motion (ROM) and disability.Methods: Sixty-one patients (48 females and 13 males; mean age: 43.04± 6.31, years) with SIS wereenrolled into the study. The patients were randomized into two treatment groups receiving either a singlecorticosteroid and local anesthetic (LA) injection, or kinesio taping performed three times by intervals of 3day. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity, range of motion (ROM) degrees of, shoulderwere recorded and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was, performed to evaluate functionaldisability, before treatment, at theŞrst and fourth, weeks after therapies. A exercise program was prescribed for both groups including pendulum, active range of motion (ROM) and strengthening exercises.Results: Pain, functional outcome measures were determined to have improved signiŞcantly in bothgroups at the end of therapies atŞrst and fourth weeks (p < 0.05), but these improvements were moresigniŞcant in the injection group than in kinesio taping group (p < 0.05). The improvements in pain atrest, shoulder abduction degrees, and SPADI scores atŞrst and fourth weeks were statistically higher ininjection group than in kinesio taping group.Conclusion: Although the improvement in pain intensity at rest, ROM and disability were better withlocal injection, KT may be an alternative noninvasive method to local subacromial injection for patientssuffering from subacromial impingement syndrome.Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

GOKSU, H., TUNCAY, F., BORMAN, P. (2016). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 5, 483–488. https://ajindex.com/articles/196231

References (15)

  1. Dalton SE. The shoulder. In: Hochberg MC, Silman A, Smolen JS, et al., eds. Rheumatology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby-Elsevier; 2011:683e710
  2. Riley GP, Harrall RL, Constant CR, Chard MD, Cawston TE, Hazleman BL. Tendon degeneration and chronic shoulder pain: changes in the collagen composition of the human rotator cuff tendons in rotator cuff tendinitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:359e366
  3. Neer 2nd CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983:70e77
  4. Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH. Shoulder impingement syndrome. A critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991:269162e269173
  5. Jobe FW, Bradley JP. The diagnosis and nonoperative treatment of shoulder injuries in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 1989;8:419e438
  6. Kamkar A, Irrgang JJ, Whitney SL. Nonoperative management of secondary shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17:212e224
  7. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:152e164
  8. Camargo PR, Haik MN, Ludewig PM, Filho RB, Mattiello-Rosa SM, Salvini TF. Effects of strengthening and stretching exercises applied during working hours on pain and physical impairment in workers with subacromial impingement syndrome. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25:463e475
  9. Khan Y, Nagy MT, Mala J, Waseem M. The painful shoulder: shoulder impingement syndrome. Open Orthop J. 2013;6e7:347e351
  10. Canaghan PG. Steroid injection and regular shoulder specific exercises reduce the need for surgery in subacromial impingement syndrome. Evid Based Med. 2013;18:e3
  11. Karthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D. A double blind randomized controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2010;92:77e82
  12. Adebajo AO, Nash P, Hazleman BL. A prospective double blind placebo controlled study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide injection with oral diclofenac 50 mg TDS in patients with rotator cuff tendinitis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17:1207e1210
  13. Arrol B, Goodyear-Smith F. Corticosteroid injection for painful shoulder: a metaanalysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:224e228
  14. Blair B, Rokito AS, Coumo F, Jarolem K, Zuckerman JD. Efficacy of injection of corticosteroids for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1996;78-A:1685e1689
  15. Buchbinder R, Gren S, Youd JM. Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pa