Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Dual-energy CT characteristics of colon and rectal cancer allows differentiation from stool by dual-source CT

Pages
251–256
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Density or visual analysis of iodine map and VNC DECT images allow accurate differentiation of tumor from stool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to determine dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) characteristics of colorectal cancer and investigate effectiveness of DECT method in differentiating tumor from stool in patients with colorectal cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Staging was performed by DECT (80–140 kV) using dual-source CT after rectal air insufflation and without bowel preparation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Density or visual analysis of iodine map and VNC DECT images allow accurate differentiation of tumor from stool.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to determine dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) characteristics of colorectal cancer and investigate effectiveness of DECT method in differentiating tumor from stool in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS Fifty consecutive patients with colorectal tumors were enrolled. Staging was performed by DECT (80–140 kV) using dual-source CT after rectal air insufflation and without bowel preparation. Both visual and quantitative analyses were performed at 80 kV and 140 kV, on iodine map and virtual noncontrast (VNC) images. RESULTS All colorectal tumors had homogeneous pattern on iodine map. Stools demonstrated heterogeneous pattern in 86% (43/50) and homogeneous pattern in 14% (7/50) on iodine maps and were less visible on VNC images. Median density of tumors was 54 HU (18–100 HU) on iodine map and 28 HU (11–56 HU) on VNC images. Median density of stool was 36.5 HU (8–165 HU) on iodine map and -135.5 HU (-438 HU to -13 HU) on VNC images. The density of stools was significantly lower than tumors on both iodine map and VNC images (P < 0.001). The cutoff point of density measurement on VNC images was -1 HU with area under the curve of 1 and a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION Density or visual analysis of iodine map and VNC DECT images allow accurate differentiation of tumor from stool.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDENİZ, İ., İDİLMAN, İ. S., KÖKLÜ, S., HAMALOĞLU, E., ÖZMEN, M. N., AKATA, D., KARCAALTINCABA, M. (2017). Dual-energy CT characteristics of colon and rectal cancer allows differentiation from stool by dual-source CT. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 251–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/196089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. SIGGAR investigators. Computed tomographic colonog- raphy versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 2013; 381:1194–1202. [CrossRef] Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonog- raphy for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009; 301:2453–2461. [CrossRef] Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, et al. Col- orectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10,286 asymp- tomatic adults. Radiology 2010; 255:83–88. [CrossRef] Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colo- noscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011; 259:393–405. [CrossRef] Eliahou R, Azraq Y, Carmi R, Mahgerefteh SY, Sosna J. Dual-energy based spectral electronic cleansing in non-cathartic computed tomog- raphy colonography: an emerging novel tech- nique. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2010; 31:309– 314. [CrossRef] Marin D, Boll DT, Mileto A, Nelson RC. State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Ra- diology 2014; 271:327–342. [CrossRef] McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG. Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Ap- proaches, and Clinical Applications. Radiology 2015; 276:637–653. [CrossRef] Vrtiska TJ, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG, Hartman RP, Yu L, Kawashima A. Genitourinary applica- tions of dual energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194:1434–1442. [CrossRef] Karcaaltıncaba M, Aktaş A. Dual-energy CT re- visited with multidetector CT: review of prin- ciples and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17:181–194.
  2. Karcaaltincaba M, Karaosmanoglu D, Akata D, Sentürk S, Ozmen M, Alibek S. Dual energy vir- tual CT colonoscopy with dual source comput- ed tomography: initial experience. Rofo 2009; 181:859–862. [CrossRef] Cai W, Kim SH, Lee JG, Yoshida H. Informatics in radiology: dual-energy electronic cleansing for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Radiographics 2013; 33:891–912. [CrossRef] Boellaard TN, Henneman OD, Streekstra GJ, et al. The feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping. Clin Radiol 2013; 68:799– 806. [CrossRef] Schaeffer B, Johnson TR, Mang T, Kreis ME, Rei- ser MF, Graser A. Dual-energy CT colonography for preoperative “one-stop” staging in patients with colonic neoplasia. Acad