Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Our Experience with Hyperosmolar Treatment for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Pages
33–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies evaluating the efficacy and side effects of hyperosmolar treatment procedures are needed, especially in the childhood age group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Trauma that occurs during childhood is a leading preventable health problem worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiological characteristics, trauma etiologies, treatment procedures, efficacy, and side effects of 3% hypertonic saline and mannitol treatment for patients in a pediatric intensive care unit with the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or brain edema.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies evaluating the efficacy and side effects of hyperosmolar treatment procedures are needed, especially in the childhood age group.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Trauma that occurs during childhood is a leading preventable health problem worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiological characteristics, trauma etiologies, treatment procedures, efficacy, and side effects of 3% hypertonic saline and mannitol treatment for patients in a pediatric intensive care unit with the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or brain edema. Methods: The files of 35 patients with the diagnosis of TBI or brain edema were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the brain edema treatment procedure applied. Group 1 comprised patients who received only 3% hypertonic saline, patients who received both hypertonic saline and mannitol were included in Group 2, and Group 3 was made up of those who received only mannitol. Patients were also categorized according to their admission Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Results: Sixteen (45.7%) of the 35 patients were female and 19 (54.3%) were male. An evaluation of complications that developed in the course of treatment revealed that renal failure was the most frequent, observed in 17 patients (48.6%). Of the 17 patients who developed renal failure, 14 (82.4%) were evaluated as severe TBI based on GCS, which was statistically significant (p=0.004). When the brain edema treatment of these 17 patients was examined, there was statistical significance in the finding that 15 (88.2%) of the patients had received mannitol (p=0.037). The serum urea and creatinine levels of patients who developed renal failure were found to be positively correlated with the number of mannitol doses received (r=0.784; p=0.001). Discussion and Conclusion: Hypertonic saline alone or in combination with mannitol is used in the treatment of brain edema. The present findings suggest that 3% hypertonic saline is safer in hyperosmolar treatment of traumatic brain injury and that mannitol should be used with caution, especially in young patients. Further studies evaluating the efficacy and side effects of hyperosmolar treatment procedures are needed, especially in the childhood age group.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZAR, A., TÜRE, E., AKIN, F. (2018). Our Experience with Hyperosmolar Treatment for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 33–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/196067

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:72–80
  2. Karamanos E, Teixeira PG, Sivrikoz E, Varga S, Chouliaras K, Okoye O, et al. Intracranial pressure versus cerebral perfusion pressure as a marker of outcomes in severe head injury: a prospective evaluation. Am J Surg 2014;208:363–71. [CrossRef ] 3. Stein PD, Sabbah HN, Viano DC, Vostal JJ. Response of the heart to nonpenetrating cardiac trauma. J Trauma 1982;22:364–73
  3. Dewan MC, Mummareddy N, Wellons JC 3rd, Bonfield CM. Epidemiology of Global Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Qualitative Review. World Neurosurg 2016;91:497–509.e1. [CrossRef ] 5. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/ view/cdc/12294. Accessed Oct 2017
  4. Salottolo K, Levy AS, Slone DS, Mains CW, Bar-Or D. The effect of age on Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury. JAMA Surg 2014;149:727–34. [CrossRef ] 7. Dunning J, Daly JP, Malhotra R, Stratford-Smith P, Lomas JP, Lecky F, et al. The implications of NICE guidelines on the management of children presenting with head injury. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:763–7. [CrossRef ] 8. Nakayama DK, Copes WS, Sacco WJ. The effect of patient age upon survival in pediatric trauma. J Trauma 1991;31:1521–6
  5. Ruppel RA, Kochanek PM, Adelson PD, Rose ME, Wisniewski SR, Bell MJ, et al. Excitatory amino acid concentrations in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury in infants and children: the role of child abuse. J Pediatr 2001;138:18–25. [CrossRef ] 10. Vavilala MS, Bowen A, Lam AM, Uffman JC, Powell J, Winn HR, et al. Blood pressure and outcome after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2003;55:1039–44. [CrossRef ] 11. Jenkins LW, Kochanek PM. Developmental Neurobiology, Neurophysiology, and the PICU. In: Nichols DG, Shaffner DH, editors. Rogers’ Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. p. 861
  6. Stevens RD, Shoykhet M, Cadena R. Emergency Neurological Life Support: Intracranial Hypertension and Herniation. Neurocrit Care 2015;23 Suppl 2:S76–82. [CrossRef ] 13. Xu W, Gerety P, Aleman T, Swanson J, Taylor J. Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst 2016;32:1371–86. [CrossRef ] 14. Favre JB, Ravussin P, Chiolero R, Bissonnette B. Hypertonic