Journals / Androloji Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Microsurgical varicocelectomy for treatment of recurrent varicocele

Nüks varikosel tedavisinde mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi

Pages
40–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No complications were observed in both groups after the operations.CONCLUSION: Microsurgical varicocelectomy, the method which has the lowest recurrence rate in varicocele treatment, may be the gold standard in recurrent varicocele surgery

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Varicocele is the most common remediable pathology in men who are referred to the urology clinic for infertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the most common complications after varicocele surgery is recurrence.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the data of patients who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent varicocele (RMSV) and patients who were diagnosed for the first time and underwent primary MSV (PMSV) in our clinic between November 2014 and May 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No complications were observed in both groups after the operations.CONCLUSION: Microsurgical varicocelectomy, the method which has the lowest recurrence rate in varicocele treatment, may be the gold standard in recurrent varicocele surgery
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Varicocele is the most common remediable pathology in men who are referred to the urology clinic for infertility. One of the most common complications after varicocele surgery is recurrence.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the data of patients who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent varicocele (RMSV) and patients who were diagnosed for the first time and underwent primary MSV (PMSV) in our clinic between November 2014 and May 2017. Patients receiving subinguinal PMCV or NMCV due to left Grade 3 varicocele were included in the study. Patient age, preoperative and postoperative semen analysis, and complication rates were compared.RESULTS: The mean age of the study subjects was 30 (22–48) and 31.2 (25–42) years in the PMSV and RMSV groups respectively (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative semen analysis between primary and recurrent group. When the sperm parameters of PMSV patients were evaluated before and after operation, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of volume and morphology, and there was statistically significant improvement in terms of concentration and motility. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of volume, concentration and morphology and statistically significant improvement in motility before and after the operation in RMSV group. No complications were observed in both groups after the operations.CONCLUSION: Microsurgical varicocelectomy, the method which has the lowest recurrence rate in varicocele treatment, may be the gold standard in recurrent varicocele surgery

Özet

AMAÇ: Varikosel, infertilite nedeni ile üroloji kliniğine başvuran erkeklerde en sık gözlenen düzeltilebilir patolojilerdendir. Varikosel cerrahisi sonrası görülen en sık komplikasyonlardan birisi de varikoselin nüksetmesidir.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu çalışmada, kliniğimizde Kasım 2014 - Mayıs 2017 tarihleri arasında nüks varikosel nedeniyle mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi (NMCV) yapılan hastaların verileri ile, ilk defa tanı konulmuş ve primer MCV (PMCV) yapılan hastaların verilerinin retrospektif olarak karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya sol Grade 3 varikosel nedeniyle subinguinal PMCV veya NMCV yapılan hastaların verileri dahil edildi. Hastaların yaş, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası semen analizleri, komplikasyon oranları karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: Çalışmaya alınan hastaların yaş ortalaması PMCV grubunda 30 (22-48) iken NMCV grubunda 31,2 (25-42) idi (p>0,05). Primer ve nüks gruptaki operasyon öncesi semen parametreleri karşılaştırıldığında değerler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. PMCV yapılan hastaların operasyon öncesi ve sonrası semen parametreleri değerlendirildiğinde volüm ve morfoloji açısından anlamlı bir fark olmadığı, konsantrasyon ve motilite açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı iyileşme olduğu gözlendi. NMCV yapılan hastaların operasyon öncesi ve sonrası semen parametreleri değerlendirildiğinde ise volüm, konsantrasyon ve morfoloji açısından anlamlı bir fark olmadığı, motilite açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir iyileşme olduğu gözlendi. Hastalar komplikasyon açısından değerlendirildiğinde, ameliyatlar sonrasında her iki grupta da herhangi bir komplikasyonun gelişmediği gözlendi.SONUÇ: Varikosel tedavisinde en düşük nüks oranına sahip yöntem olan mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi, nüks varikosel cerrahisinde de altın standart yöntem olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, A., DİREK, H. C., ERDİK, A. (2017). Microsurgical varicocelectomy for treatment of recurrent varicocele. Androloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 40–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/195921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kendirci M, Miroğlu C. Varikosel patofizyolojisi. İçinde: Kadıoğlu A, Çayan S, Semerci B ve ark., editörler. Erkek Reproduktif Sistem Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi. İstanbul: Türk Androloji Derneği yayını; 2004. s.427–46
  2. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993;59:613–6
  3. World Health Organization. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1289–93
  4. Cayan S, Lee D, Black LD, et al. Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility. Urology 2001;57:530–5
  5. Belli L, Arrondello C, Antronaco R, et al. Venography of postoperative recurrence of symptomatic varicocele in males. Radiol Med 1998;95:470–3
  6. Lee JW, Paick JS, Kim SW. Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: comparison of pediatric and adult patients. Korean J Urol 2008;49:1029–34. doi: 10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.1029 7. Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology 2007;69:417–20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057 8. Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, Papp GK, Jungwirth A, Weidner W; EAU Working Group on Male Infertility. EAU guidelines on male infertility. Eur Urol 2005;48:703–11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.002 9. Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology 2000;55:750–4
  7. Weissbach L, Thelen M, Adolphs HD. Treatment of idiopathic varicoceles by transfemoral vein occlusion. J Urol 1981;126:354– 6
  8. Ferguson JM, Gillespie IN, Chalmers N, et al. Percutaneous varicocele embolization in the treatment of infertility. Br J Radiol 1995;68:700–3. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-811-700 12. Oktar T, Ahmedov İ, Kadıoğlu A. Varikosel tedavisi. İçinde: Kadıoğlu A, Çayan S, Semerci B ve ark., editörler. Erkek Reprodüktif Sistem Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi. İstanbul: Türk Androloji Derneği yayını; 2004. s.463–72
  9. Marmar JL, DeBenedictis TJ, Praiss D. The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril 1985;43:583–8
  10. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicoce