Journals / Ağrı / 2010 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section

Sezaryenlerde intratekal levobupivakaine ilave edilen fentanil ve morfinin postoperatif ağrı üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Journal
Ağrı
Pages
151–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Despite more adverse effects, additional analgesic requirement is lower in Group M, and the long-term painless postoperative period accounts for the choice by mothers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Our prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to detect the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either intrathecal 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 0.1 mg morphine (Group M, n=30) or 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 20 mcg fentanyl (Group F, n=30).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Despite more adverse effects, additional analgesic requirement is lower in Group M, and the long-term painless postoperative period accounts for the choice by mothers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Our prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to detect the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. Methods: After approval by the hospital ethics committee and obtaining written informed consent, ASA I-II parturients undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled in this study. None of the patients had any contraindication for spinal anesthesia or sensitivity to local anesthetics. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either intrathecal 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 0.1 mg morphine (Group M, n=30) or 10 mg 5% levobupivacaine + 20 mcg fentanyl (Group F, n=30). The onset of sensorial block and anesthesia, interval of effective analgesia until the first analgesic requirement, disappearance of motor block according to modified Bromage scale, duration of spinal analgesia, additional analgesic requirement, amount of additional analgesic, adverse effects, and postoperative patient satisfaction were recorded. Results: The additional analgesic requirement period was significantly longer in Group M than Group F (p<0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were significantly higher in Group F than Group M (p<0.05). Intended, delivered and total analgesic amount values were significantly higher in Group F than Group M (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction and presentation elsewhere were significantly higher in Group M than Group F (p<0.01). Conclusion: Despite more adverse effects, additional analgesic requirement is lower in Group M, and the long-term painless postoperative period accounts for the choice by mothers.

Özet

Amaç: Prospektif, randomize, çift-kör çalışmamız sezaryen için intratekal levobupivakaine ilave edilen fentanil ve morfinin postoperatif ağrı üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemiz etik kurul onayı ve hastaların yazılı onayları alındıktan sonra sezaryen ameliyatı geçirecek ASA I-II grubunda, spinal anestezinin kontrendike olmadığı ve lokal anestezik duyarlılığı olmayan 60 olgu çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar 2 gruba ayrıldı. I. gruba (Grup M, n=30) intratekal 10 mg %5 levobupivakain + 0.1 mg morfin, II. guruba (Grup F, n=30) intratekal 10 mg %5 levobupivakain + 20 mcgr fentanil uygulandı. Postoperatif ilk analjezi gereksinimine kadar geçen efektif analjezi süresi, modifiye Bromage skalasına göre motor bloğun tamamen ortadan kalkma süresi, hastaların ek analjezik ihtiyacı, kullanılan ek analjezik miktarı, yan etkiler ve postoperatif hasta memnuniyeti değerlendirilerek kaydedildi. Bulgular: Morfin grubunda ek analjezi istem süresi fentanil grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha uzun olarak belirlendi (p<0.001). Morfin grubunda intraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyon sıklığı fentanil grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek olduğu belirlendi (p<0.05). Fentanil grubunda istenen ilaç miktarı, sunulan ilaç miktarı ve kullanılan analjezik miktarı değerleri morfin grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek bulundu (p<0.001). Morfin grubunda hasta memnuniyeti ve başkasına tavsiye etme fentanil grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek tespit edildi (p<0.01). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda sezaryenlerde intratekal levobupivakaine eklenen morfin ve fentanilin yan etki insidansının morfin grubunda fentanil grubundan daha yüksek olmasına rağmen postoperatif ek analjezi ihtiyacının çok daha az olduğunu ve uzun süreli ağrısız geçirilen postoperatif dönemin anneler için tercih sebebi olduğu sonucuna vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, P., ÖZYUVACI, E., VATANSEVER, Ş., TOPRAK, N., AKYOL, O. (2010). Assessment of the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. Ağrı, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 151–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/195525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Şahin Ş, Oven MD. Ağrısız doğum ve sezaryende anestezi. Nobel & Güneş Tıp Kitabevi; 2006. p. 8-69
  2. Ready LB. Acute perioperative pain. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed., Churchill Livingstone Inc; 2000. p. 2323-50
  3. Morgan P. Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics. Can J Anaesthesia 1995;42:1145-63
  4. Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lam-McCulloch J. Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Can J Anaesth 2000;47(10):956-61
  5. Gustafsson LL, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Spinal opioid analgesia. A critical update. Drugs 1988;35(6):597-603
  6. Dahl JB, Rosenberg J, Dirkes WE, Mogensen T, Kehlet H. Prevention of postoperative pain by balanced analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1990;64(4):518-20
  7. Reisner LS, Lin D. Anaesthesia for cesarean section. In: Chestnut DH. Obstetric Anaesthesia Principles and practice. Mosby, Inc. 2nd ed., 1999. p. 465-92
  8. Pavy TJG, Gambling DR, Douglas MJ. Combination of diclofenac and intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery. Anaesth Analg 1998;87:1453-60
  9. Eisenach JC, Grice SC, Dewan DM. Patient-controlled analgesia following cesarean section: a comparison with epidural and intramuscular narcotics. Anesthesiology 1988;68(3):444-8
  10. Cohen SE, Tan S, White PF. Sufentanil analgesia following cesarean section: epidural versus intravenous administration. Anesthesiology 1988;68(1):129-34
  11. Chadwick HS, Ready LB. Intrathecal and epidural morphine sulfate for post-cesarean analgesia-a clinical comparison. Anesthesiology 1988;68(6):925-9
  12. Kireçci FB. İntratekal bupivakaine eklenen fentanil ve morfnin anestezi kalitesi ve analjezi süresine etkisi. İstanbul: 2001
  13. Karaman S, Kocabas S, Uyar M, Hayzaran S, Firat V. The efects of sufentanil or morphine added to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23(4):285-91
  14. Vercauteren M. Obstetric spinal analgesia and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2003;16(5):503-7
  15. Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L, Demir T, Izydorczic M, Vanderick B. Comparison of the efects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2003;91(5):684-9
  16. Dahlgren G, Hultstrand C, Jakobsson J, Norman M, Eriksson EW, Martin H. Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1997;85(6):1288-93
  17. Nelson KE, Rauch T, Terebuh V, D’Angelo R. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor