Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Problems encountered in screening study with ultrasound for early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of hip in eastern region of Turkey

Pages
6–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the success of national DDH screening program, additional precautions must be taken to ensure the participation of the families and re lease of the swaddling.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to evaluate results of the screening program of the development al dysplasia of the hip (DDH) examined in newborn period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By interviewing with the family of 1680 newborns born in our institution or referred, the information was given about the DDH and its risk factors, obtained results were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the success of national DDH screening program, additional precautions must be taken to ensure the participation of the families and re lease of the swaddling.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study is to evaluate results of the screening program of the development al dysplasia of the hip (DDH) examined in newborn period. The problems encountered in the applicability of the early screening program were e valuated. By interviewing with the family of 1680 newborns born in our institution or referred, the information was given about the DDH and its risk factors, obtained results were recorded. The families were told to bring their babies for examination and hip ultrasound at the 3rd or 4th week of birth. In addition, all the parents were called by telephone the day prior to their appointments. Five hundred and thirty-six babies (31.3%) were brought to the first appointment. Forty -two hips (3.9%) of the 30 infants (5.6%) were detected as dislocated (Type 2c, D, 3). The 8 of these 30 patients (26.7%) whom the treatment was started were brought for the second control. Asymmetry of thigh folds was positive in the highest rate as the finding of the examination in the infants brought to the appointment. The rate of swaddling at the first appointment was found to be 74.2%. Surprisingly, less than one third of children were brought to ultr asound examination at first control. Similarly, about 3/4 of the parents continued to use swaddling for their babies. For the success of national DDH screening program, additional precautions must be taken to ensure the participation of the families and re lease of the swaddling.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, M. F., GÜNER, S., GÖKALP, M. A., KURDOĞLU, Z., GÖZEN, A., KORKMAZ, M. F., TÜRKÖZÜ, T., AKDENİZ, H., TUNCER, O. (2018). Problems encountered in screening study with ultrasound for early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of hip in eastern region of Turkey. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 6–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/194665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Moosa NK, Kumar PT, Mahmoodi SM. Incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Dubai. Saudi Med J 2009; 30: 952-955
  2. Tumer Y, Omeroğlu H. Prevention of developmental hip dysplasia in Turkey. Acta 3. Orthop Traumatol Turc 1997; 31: 176-181
  3. Songür M, Akel İ, Karahan S, Tümer Y. Prevalence of untreated hip dislocation in Turkish children aged 6 months to 14 years. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45: 215-220
  4. Guner SI, Guner S, Peker E, et al. Are consanguineous marriage and swaddling the risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip? J Membr Biol 2013; 246: 115-119
  5. Tönnis D, Storch K, Ulbrich H. Results of newborn screening for CDH with and without sonography and correlation of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10: 145-152
  6. Omeroğlu H, Koparal S. The role of clinical examination and risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study in 188 referred young infants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 7-11
  7. Shorter D, Hong T, Osborn DA. Cochrane Review: Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants. Evid Based Child Health 2013; 8: 11-54
  8. Turkish republican statistical institution data, internet access:
  9. Graf R. Hip sonography. Diagnosis and management of infant hip dysplasia. 2nd ed. Springer Verlag. New York 2006
  10. Mubarak SJ, Bialik V. Pavlik: the man and his method. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23: 342-346
  11. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Blazer S, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 93-99
  12. Shaw BA, Segal LS, AAP Section on Orthopaedics. Evaluation and referral for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20163107
  13. Demirhan M, Sar C, Aydinok HC, Cakmak M, Coban A. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip. Is newborn screening necessary? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1994; 28: 8-14
  14. Mostert AK, Tulp NJ, Castelein RM. Results of Pavlik harness treatment for neonatal hip dislocation as related to Graf’s sonographic classification. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20: 306- 310
  15. Inoue T, Naito M, Nomiyama H. Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip with the Pavlik harness: factors for predicting unsuccessful reduction. J Pediatr Orthop B 2001; 10: 186-191
  16. Kotlarsky P, Haber R, Bialik V, Eidelman M. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years? World J Orthop 2015; 6: 886-901