SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Performance Based Evaulation on Preservice Biology Teachers' Achievement and Laboratory Report Writing Skills

PERİHAN GÜNEŞ
HİKMET KATIRCIOĞLU
MİRAÇ YILMAZ
Pages
71–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, it was determined that preservice teachers who use rubrics display a higher skill in writing laboratory reports and have a higher cognitive field level compared to those who do not

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the effect of performance based evulation on preservice biology teachers' cognitive achievements and laboratory report writing skills about DNA isolation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, nonequivalent control-group design were used to determine the effect of performance based evaluation on pre-service biology teachers' achievement and laboratory report skills about DNA isolation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, it was determined that preservice teachers who use rubrics display a higher skill in writing laboratory reports and have a higher cognitive field level compared to those who do not
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of performance based evulation on preservice biology teachers' cognitive achievements and laboratory report writing skills about DNA isolation. In the study, nonequivalent control-group design were used to determine the effect of performance based evaluation on pre-service biology teachers' achievement and laboratory report skills about DNA isolation. The sample of the study was 70 pre-service teachers. A rubric and DNA isolation achievement test were developed for the data collection. Data was collected by pre-and post-administration of achievement test and administration of rubric. Before the beginning of the study, a pre-test was applied in order to determine the cognitive field levels of students on DNA isolation. Then, a DNA isolation test was applied to the experiment and control groups. While the experiment group was given a rubric to be used during writing their laboratory reports, the control group was not. At the end of the study, a post-test was applied in order to determine students' cognitive field levels. To detect the differences between the experimental and the control groups, the independent samples t-test was used. At the end of the study, it was determined that preservice teachers who use rubrics display a higher skill in writing laboratory reports and have a higher cognitive field level compared to those who do not

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, P., KATIRCIOĞLU, H., YILMAZ, M. (2015). The Effect of Performance Based Evaulation on Preservice Biology Teachers' Achievement and Laboratory Report Writing Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 71–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/194134

References (18)

  1. Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57 (5), 13-18.
  2. Andrade, H. G. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues http://cie.asu.edu/volume4/number4/. [On-line], 4 (4). Accessed October 12. 2010
  3. Andrade, H.G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53 (1), 27-31.
  4. Andrade, H.G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessmentin learning to write. The Journal of Educational Research, 97 (1), 21-30.
  5. Andrade, H. G., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10 (3), 1-11.
  6. Andrade, H. G., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27 (2), 3-13.
  7. Andrade, H. G., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self assessment and self efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102 (4), 287-301.
  8. Aschbacher, P. R. (1991). Performance assessment: State activity, interest and concerns. Applied Measurement in Education, 4 (4), 275-288.
  9. Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2006). Geleneksel alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme öğretmen el kitabı, Ankara:
  10. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Baron, J. B. (1991). Strategies for development of effective performance exercises. Applied Measurement in Education, 4 (4), 305-318.
  11. Berberoğlu, G., (2006). Sınıf içi ölçme ve değerlendirme teknikleri. İstanbul:
  12. Morpha. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Scarloss, B., Schultz, S. & Abram, P. (2002). Can group learn? Teacher College Record, 104, 1045-1068.
  13. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W., (2007).
  14. Educational research an introduction, USA:Pearson İnternational Edition.
  15. Goodrich, H. G. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54 (4). 14-17.
  16. Gunes, P. (2011). Dereceli puanlama anahtarının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin araştırma becerisi ve bilişsel alan düzeyine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  17. Hafner, J. C., & Hafner, P. M. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An Emprical Study of Student Peer-Group Rating. International of Science Education, 25 (12), 1509-15298.
  18. Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill IV, G., W., McEntarffer, R., Mehrotra, C., Nes