Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 11

AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE EXPORT-LED GROWTH HYPOTHESIS IN TURKEY

Pages
1535–1551
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turkey, however, did not have the proper environment to succeed with such a development policy based on private enterprises in the 1920s

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The export-led growth [ELG] hypothesis postulates a causal connection between export and growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigates ELG hypothesis using quarterly time series data for the period 1980:1-2007:2 in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turkey, however, did not have the proper environment to succeed with such a development policy based on private enterprises in the 1920s
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Export-Led Growth Hypothesis · coingration · Turkey

Abstract

The export-led growth [ELG] hypothesis postulates a causal connection between export and growth. This study investigates ELG hypothesis using quarterly time series data for the period 1980:1-2007:2 in Turkey. The hypothesis is tested by applying the cointegration and error correction procedures. We find an evidence to support the hypothesis that there is a long-run and short-run bidirectional causality relationship between export growth and real GDP growth in Turkey. The economic policy implemented immediately after the independence of Republic of Turkey in 1923 was based on a liberal economic policy which emphasizes the role of private sector. During the early periods, main emphasis was given to the establishment of an economic base on the grounds of self sufficiency. In order to achieve this goal, in fact, liberal economic policies accepted in the first Turkish economic conference which was held in 1923 in Izmir. Turkey, however, did not have the proper environment to succeed with such a development policy based on private enterprises in the 1920s

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAR, S. T. İ., TABAN, S., AKTAR, İ. (2008). AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE EXPORT-LED GROWTH HYPOTHESIS IN TURKEY. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 11, 1535–1551. https://ajindex.com/articles/194089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Quarn, A. S and S. Abu-Bader. 2004. “The Validity of the ELG Hypothesis in the MENA Region: Cointegration and Error Correction Model Analysis,” Applied Economics, 36:685-1695.
  2. Abdulnasser, H and I. Manuchehr. 2000. “Time Series Evidence for Balassa’s Export-Led Growth Hypothesis,” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9:355-365.
  3. Alıcı, A.A and M. Ş. Ucal. 2003. “Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and Output Growth of Turkey: Causality Analysis,” European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference, (September), Madrid. Asafu-Adjaye, J. 2000. “The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Asian Developing Countries,” Energy Economics, 2:615-625.
  4. Charemza, W.W and D.F. Deadman. 1997. New Directions in Econometric Practise, Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar. Darrat, A. 1987. “Are Exports and Engine of Growth? Another Look at the Evidence,” Applied Economics, 19:277-283.
  5. Dickey, D.A and W.A. Fuller. 1979. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74:427-431.
  6. Doğanlar, M and M. Fisunoğlu. 1999. “Causality Between Exports and Economic Growth in Asian Countries,” Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 10(11):3-11.
  7. Ekanayake, E. M. 1999. “Exports and Economic Growth in Asian Developing Countries: Cointegration and Error-Correction Models,” Journal of Economic Development, 24(2):43-56.
  8. Engle, R.F and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, 55:251-76.
  9. Esfahani, H.S. 1991. “Exports, Imports, and Economic Growth in Semi-Industrialized Countries,” Journal of Development Economics, 35(1):93-116.
  10. Feder, G. 1982. “On Exports and Economic Growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 12:59-73.
  11. Ghatak, S, C. Milner and U. Utkulu. 1997. “Exports, Export Composition and Growth: Cointegration and Causality Evidence for Malaysia,” Applied Economics, 29:213-223.
  12. Granger, C.W.J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods,” Econometrica, 37(3):424-435.
  13. Gübe, Y. 1997. “İktisadi Büyüme ve İhracat Performansı,” Hazine Dergisi, 6:17-28.
  14. Herzer, D., F. N. Lehmann and B. Siliverstovs. 2004. “Export-Led Growth in Chile: Assessing the Role of Export Composition in Productivity Growth,” Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers. Johansen, S. 1988. “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,” Journ