Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 32

ÖRGÜTSEL SOSYALLEŞME: BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Pages
0
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, for providing a support for the nomological network formation of the concept, some related contextual factors in different researches that are related to organizational socialization is also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, because of the change in forms and tools of modern business life, the attitudes and expectations of employment produced by the economy of knowledge workers, it’s considered crucial for the organizational socialization concept to get updated in order to be discussed and researched thoroughly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It’s accepted that the future studies are in need of assesments which refine levels and outcomes of socialization (Liang ve Hsieh, 2008: 212).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, for providing a support for the nomological network formation of the concept, some related contextual factors in different researches that are related to organizational socialization is also discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel sosyalleşme · örgütsel sosyalleşme taktikleri · yeni işgören (newcomer)

Abstract

Today, because of the change in forms and tools of modern business life, the attitudes and expectations of employment produced by the economy of knowledge workers, it’s considered crucial for the organizational socialization concept to get updated in order to be discussed and researched thoroughly. It’s accepted that the future studies are in need of assesments which refine levels and outcomes of socialization (Liang ve Hsieh, 2008: 212). In this study, the few studies’ complex results that focus on socialization tactics within organizational socialization is examined. Furthermore, for providing a support for the nomological network formation of the concept, some related contextual factors in different researches that are related to organizational socialization is also discussed.

Özet

Günümüzde iş görme şekillerinin ve araçlarınınmodern iş yaşamında değişmesi, bilgi ekonomisinin ürettiği bilgi işçilerinin istihdamdaki tutumları ve beklentileri, örgütsel sosyalleşmenin yeniden güncellenerek tartışılması ve araştırılması açısından önem arz etmektedir. Örgütsel sosyalleşme üzerine gelecekte yapılacak çalışmaların, yazında ihtiyaç duyulan kavramın düzey ve sonuç ölçümlerinin sadeleştirilmesine yönelik olması beklenmektedir (Liang ve Hsieh, 2008:212). Bu çalışma, bir işgören adayının, kariyer hedefleri doğrultusunda çalışmaya başlayacağı işyerinin tam bir üyesi olma sürecini hızlandıran örgütsel sosyalleşme taktiklerini, mevcut yazından yola çıkarak ilgili faktörlerle sentezlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda örgütsel sosyalleşmenin farklı çalışmalarda, görece farklı şekillerde ilişkilendirildiği kavramlardan bazıları da kavramın nomolojik ağ oluşumuna destek sağlamak üzere ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, A. A. G. A. Ç. (2013). ÖRGÜTSEL SOSYALLEŞME: BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 32, 0. https://ajindex.com/articles/193832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adkins, Cherly L. (1995), “Previous Work Experience and Organizational Socialization: A Longitudinal Examination”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No: 3, s. 839-862.
  2. Aguilera, Ruth V. - Dencker, John C. - Yalabik, Zeynep Y. (2006), “Institutions and Organizational Socialization: Integrating Employees in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions”, Griffith, David A. Cavusgil, Tamer S. - Hult, Tomas G. M. – Lewin, Arie Y. (Eds.), Emerging Research Frontiers International Business Studies, Vol. 2, s. 1-55.
  3. Ahuja, Manju K. - Galvin, John E. (2003), “Socialization in Virtual Groups”, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No:2, s. 161-185.
  4. Akbaba, Atilla (2002), “Örgütsel Kültür”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 3, s. 1-32, (Çev. Atilla Akbaba). Schein, Edgar, H. (1990), “Organizational Culture”, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, No: 2, s. 109-119.
  5. Allen, Natalie J. - Meyer, John P. (1990a), “The measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to The Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, No: 63, s. 1-18.
  6. Allen, Natalie J. - Meyer, John P. (1990b): “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No:4,s. 847-858.
  7. Allen, David G. (2006), “Do Organizational Socialization Tactics Influence Newcomer Embeddedness and Turnover?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No: 2, s. 237-256.
  8. Ashforth, Blake E. - Saks, Alan M. (1996), “Socialization Tactics: Longitudinal Effects on Newcomer Adjusment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No: 1, s. 149-178.
  9. Ashforth, Blake E. - Saks, Alan M. - Lee, Raymond T. (1997), “On The Dimensionality of Jones’ (1986) Measures of Organizational Socialization Tactics”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 5, No: 4, s. 200-214.
  10. Balcı, Ali (2003), “Örgütsel Sosyalleşme”, 2. Basım, Pegem Yayınları,
  11. Ankara.
  12. Bauer, Talya N. - Green, Stephen G. (1998), “Testing The Combined Effects of Newcomer Information Seeking and Manager Behavior on Socialization”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, No: 1, s. 72Bauer, Talya N. - Bodner, Todd - Erdoğan, Berrin - Truxillo, Donald M. - Tucker, Jennifer S. (2007), “Newcomer Adjustment During Organizational Socialization: A Meta-analytic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, and Methods”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No: 3, s. 707–721.
  13. Berberoğlu, Güneş N. (1991), “İşletmelerde Organizasyon-Birey